Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Medical Records

Rate this question


Berta

Question

If you cannot afford an IMO , at least try to get someone with some medical background to review them for you.

Many of us have nurses, EMTS, and medical students in our families or know someone with some background in medicine.

And the internet itself has made this easier to do than ever- to help us understand medical notations in symbols and how to read Blood chem reports etc.

The award I just got from BVA goes back to 1994 with a potential back to 1988.

It is for direct service connected death of my husband due to AO (from DMII diabetes Type II with complications of DMII causing death)

Neither the symbols or words 'DMII' nor 'diabetes mellitus' ever appears in Rod's entire VA medical records.

Only one abbreviation (DVD) and one entry that was very difficult to read "cf diag"

followed by 'fingerstick to R/O' contained the initial basis for my claim.

My prior Section 1151 DIC award was based on these four entries:

"RO CAD" ,"WU next week for CAD" , "diaphoretic" , "It is in the 1988 records"

Also these few entries were the basis of my award under FTCA.

Of course there was more evidence then this that I found-the EKGs etc- but my point here is-

these were the sole medical entry written documentations from VA that I had found -which triggered all of my claims -all awarded-

Medical records need to be thoroughly read over and understood for many of our claims.

Often only a real doctor can do that for us.

Bu the internet has made it easier for all of us to understand what these records reveal.

It is worth it to take the time to get familiar with your medical records even if your claim seems obvious and easy to award and rate.

Older handwritten VA medical entries often have to be blown up on a scanner or even read through a mirrior to decifer them.Entries that are crossed out should be carefully considered if you can still read what they crossed out.

Medical symbology is for the most part the same today as it was in your SMRS. All symbology can be decifered through many medical web sites.

You can learn how to interpret an EKG and even CT scans and MRIs by accessing numerous medical sites on the web.

All entries by any medical person in our VA medical records are clues to succeeding in many of our claims.

Many claims certainly do not need this detailed investigation of what the records reveal -yet many denials are based on a VA rater or C & P doctor)certainly not taking the time necessary to study the whole record -and this is something it pays to do ourselves.

VA will not connect the dots on anything unless it is obvious and takes them little time to do.

And their is nothing better then sending them copies of your own records highlighted and then expalined as to how the specific entries or test results support you claims.

or having a real doctor do that in a well prepared IMO.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I totally agree with Bertha. I made numerous copies of my records and I highlight the important evidentuary material. Make sure you go over every piece of evidence in your file. I found wrong dates typed on my discharge papers. I had serviced connected injuries and type on my discharge papers were dates months prior to the actual injuries. Also the examiner did not sign the form.

IT IS IMPERITIVE TO CHECK THEM ALL BUT PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION, AS BERTA ADVISES, TO THE MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION,(sorry for caps). Medical terminology and symptomology can make or break a claim. Bertha found in Rod's chart a notation something to this effect ...that his bs(blood sugar)was very high, yet no one acted upon that nor did they do further tests to establish a diagnosis of diabetes...unfortunately she lost her dear husband, due to a variety of medical mistakes. So highlight it, or write it on a piece of paper and look it up! If you can't read it ask a medically oriented/educated person for help.

This is your life, and you must do everything to fight for your rights. Follow the info on the vets sites for help with claims, and look up cases that have prev gone through BVA with similiar diag and read the evidence brought forth in them too.

If you cannot afford an IMO , at least try to get someone with some medical background to review them for you.

Many of us have nurses, EMTS, and medical students in our families or know someone with some background in medicine.

And the internet itself has made this easier to do than ever- to help us understand medical notations in symbols and how to read Blood chem reports etc.

The award I just got from BVA goes back to 1994 with a potential back to 1988.

It is for direct service connected death of my husband due to AO (from DMII diabetes Type II with complications of DMII causing death)

Neither the symbols or words 'DMII' nor 'diabetes mellitus' ever appears in Rod's entire VA medical records.

Only one abbreviation (DVD) and one entry that was very difficult to read "cf diag"

followed by 'fingerstick to R/O' contained the initial basis for my claim.

My prior Section 1151 DIC award was based on these four entries:

"RO CAD" ,"WU next week for CAD" , "diaphoretic" , "It is in the 1988 records"

Also these few entries were the basis of my award under FTCA.

Of course there was more evidence then this that I found-the EKGs etc- but my point here is-

these were the sole medical entry written documentations from VA that I had found -which triggered all of my claims -all awarded-

Medical records need to be thoroughly read over and understood for many of our claims.

Often only a real doctor can do that for us.

Bu the internet has made it easier for all of us to understand what these records reveal.

It is worth it to take the time to get familiar with your medical records even if your claim seems obvious and easy to award and rate.

Older handwritten VA medical entries often have to be blown up on a scanner or even read through a mirrior to decifer them.Entries that are crossed out should be carefully considered if you can still read what they crossed out.

Medical symbology is for the most part the same today as it was in your SMRS. All symbology can be decifered through many medical web sites.

You can learn how to interpret an EKG and even CT scans and MRIs by accessing numerous medical sites on the web.

All entries by any medical person in our VA medical records are clues to succeeding in many of our claims.

Many claims certainly do not need this detailed investigation of what the records reveal -yet many denials are based on a VA rater or C & P doctor)certainly not taking the time necessary to study the whole record -and this is something it pays to do ourselves.

VA will not connect the dots on anything unless it is obvious and takes them little time to do.

And their is nothing better then sending them copies of your own records highlighted and then expalined as to how the specific entries or test results support you claims.

or having a real doctor do that in a well prepared IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got some copies of my actual EKG readouts for previous years from the VA. In my records, the narrative report states that all of my EKGs and Holter monitors (24-hr EKGs) have been "normal". Upon review of my actual EKGs.....wow. The complete opposite is true. They confirm I've had sick sinus syndrome for several years and the idiot VA cardiologists either were too stupid to dx it.....or just didn't care.

Yes, I'm gathering info for 1151 action as well as a Tort Claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use