Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim Denial By False Logic

Rate this question


monochaser

Question

Have nexus, evidence, and living with pain, yet a claim for an increase from 0% was denied with lightning speed. I don't know what to do next. Am willing to shell out $$ for a civilian ortho MD if it will help, but I don't have health insurance, so I must know what kind of evidence and info I'm looking for before I go.

Long story short- SC 0% upon discharge for Lumbosacral Strain. Back pain has progressively gotten worse in last 10 years until 2003. 5 consecutive months of (intermittent) incapacitating back problems in that year, VA performed MRI and diagnosed a herniated disk. With this I applied for an increase, and with murphy's law in full force, my back pain was in remission when C&P time came around. But I had my evidence. Surely the good doc would see that. Well, the examiner was an openly hostile retired "rent-a-doc" who insulted my profession. Not a Good day.

He gave his opinion that Lumbosacral strains are not causitive of a Herniated Disk (no kidding), and any pain I was experiencing was from the disk condition, not the service connected back strain. Claim Denied.

What this einstein did not adress is, when did the disk condition occur? It could've happened in the military and been the cause of the back problems since then. They never CT'd or MRI'd back then. The denial knocked the wind out of me and the year passed by- but I want to re-open a new claim as I'm living with pain on an almost daily basis. Unfortunately all the VSO's are concentrated over a hundred miles away and are so backlogged with cases it is difficult to get some face time with them.

The most frustrating aspect of this is contained in the first sentence of this post. I provided the VA with everything we have been told is required, but they played games with the cause-result factor- but for this I think it is possible to argue against their position due to their lack of scientific evidence. How can they can get away with these weak excuses for denial. Every time I limp from one room of my house to another in agony, I curse the flippant, direspectful attitude of that overpaid c&p MD.

Since nexus is established, I am frustrated with having to go bust a hump and collect evidence- any suggestions for what I should include in my next claim for an increase? And what do you think about using one of those state employed VSO's? They are only 50 miles away- still pretty far. Thanks for any light you can shed on these circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Keep journals of when you have pain, how severe it is and how it affects your life at the time. Try to get into some form of long term rehab and/or regular exams for your back and keep ALL the evidence you acquire. Find out the criteria minimums for the various levels in regards to back injuries and try to formulate your journal, and medical evidence, to meet said criteria. You need to spoon feed them the information so that they have NO choice but to grant the level you are seeking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Berta

They need evidence like this:

http://www.neurosurgerytoday.org/what/pati...e/herniated.asp

"Causes

A single excessive strain or injury may cause a herniated disc. However, disc material degenerates naturally as you age, and the ligaments that hold it in place begin to weaken. As this degeneration progresses, a relatively minor strain or twisting movement can cause a disc to rupture."

But better yet, a documented medical statement that supports this fact.

Is there any time at all since you got the denial left to file a Notice of Disagreement?

The above abstract, attached to the NOD, supports your claim.

These claims can succeed with good medical evidence:

"This appeal arises from a May 1992 rating decision in which

the regional office (RO) denied entitlement to service

connection for degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral

spine, status post laminectomy and denied entitlement to an

increased evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of

a lumbosacral sprain. In June 1996, service connection for

degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine, status

post laminectomy was granted, in part and parcel to the

service-connected lumbosacral strain disability and the

assigned 10 percent evaluation was increased to 20 percent."

From : http://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files2/9716400.txt

The decision however denied higher rating-

the veteran maintained the 20% rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mono

You need medical evidence in the form of a narrative from your own doctor that will connect the back strain in service to your current problems. You just have to pound them with evidence and the more the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't have a doctor other than my PCP at a VA outreach clinic who I've seen 2x in the last year- I'm one of those people the politicians are always talking about- an American without health insurance. Must say the VA has provided some excellent care, so no complaints there.

Thanks for the responses. My time to file a Notice of Disagreement has expired- has been 1 yr and some months since the denial. I'm going to go to private doctor, that's why I was asking about what kind of evidence is needed. I would imagine one meeting with a specialist will cost almost $200 so I would like to be prepared before I go.

I've moved a lot. Is it possible my c file wasn't with my claim? Do I need to check with the RO to find out where my file resides? It would be handy to have a service officer to ask these questions, but they are 100 miles away, and busy. If they are as bad as some people say they are, how do we navigate through this confusing process? By the way, the SO that helped me with this claim last time was supposed to be the best. After the denial he said- well, that's it. You lost. Tough luck. Nothing more we can do. Thank God for this website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 121 of John Roche's book, "The Veteran's Survival Guide," addresses the subject of exams conducted while a condition is not active. He advises that you should contact the VA Medical Center to advise of this fact so you can be rescheduled and evaluated when the condition is active and can be observed by a physician.

"Failure of the VA to evaluate your condition during an active stage is grounds for reversal if the claim is denied."

He goes on to cite Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405 (1994). In that decision, the Court ruled the VA failed in its duty to assist by relying on an examination that was performed during an inactive stage.

You might try CUEing it to seek an approval effective when you first filed. It's worth a try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use