Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

"weasel" Excuses To Deny

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

It was pointed out, by TEAC, that the VA is not required to approve TDIU on the basis alone that SS awarded disability for SC conditions. The VA uses the "weasel" clause that VA's definition of totally disabled is different than SSD's definition of totally disabled. I call that the VA "weaseling" out of paying. They have lots of ways of doing that.

Another way is the Veteran files for benefits. The VA denies one benefit, says nothing about the other. A year passes. The VA now "weasels" out of paying, claiming the Veterans second benefit was "deemed denied" and that the one year clock starts and the Veterans decision became final, even tho there was no decision at all on that issue.

Please add the way the VA "weaseled" you out of your VA benefits, to help other Veterans from being weaseled out of their also.

For thoroughness, I will supply the link to the lawyer who discusses the court cases where the VA can secretly deny, or deemed deny, a Veterans claims:

(Scroll down to the bottom.."deemed denial"..there are also other cases where the courts did not require the VA to give an answer to the Veterans claim..that his claim was "deemed denied")

http://wvajustice.com/?m=200907

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

My favorite of all time was when the VAMC in Dallas told me straight to my face that if they allowed me fee service it would cause them to have to do it for a lot of other Veterans.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Despite being on one of the most contaminated bases in the US, shown by the 1978 EPA Superfund report showing 77 toxic substances in the water and soil of Edgewood Arsenal, I was told they could not and would not SC any of the issues related to the exposures as I could not prove I had drank any of the contaminated water in the three months I was there from June thru August 1974, the EPA did not survey EA, until the summer of 1978 and ordered the immediate capping of the water wells that had been used since 1917 for the bases drinking water and bathing and all other uses, watering the grass, washing cars, filling the post swimming pool etc all of normal uses, the entire aquifer was closed, they even had to shut down the city of Edgewood marylands water and the Army paid for water to be piped in from the White Mountains.

I may not be able to prove I was exposed to specific toxic substances from that water, but they can't prove I wasn't either, and plain old common sense says anyone that consumed any water at Edgewood Arsenal should be presumed to have been exposed to the toxic substances but then no one has ever accused the VA of using common sense.

Similar to the contamination at that maine Corp base in Virginia where they found that dry cleaning solvent and the high number of disabled veterans and family members that has been in the news the past year, and that is only from one chemical, Edgewood has 77 of them.....

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

TestVet

It is sort of like agent orange. It is hard to prove you were directly exposed unless you had it sprayed on you, or marched through areas that had been recently sprayed. Spray maps show the areas that were espcially hard hit. However, since spraying was so widespread the VA can't prove you were not exposed, so they assume you were. This is because of pressure from vets and vet groups for years. In smaller contamination situations the DOD and VA will just deny the claims because there is not the pressure to at least give vets the benefit of the doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

We have denied your claim because there is no evidence of complaints , treatment or a diagnosis of in service.

That was what they told me in 1994 on my HTN claim. I actually gave up at that time but with the help of a Great VA Doc who had the SMR, turned me in the right direction. Funny how out of 17 readings over 4 years in servicve that 14 had bottom line readings over 100.

That was what lit the fire under my backside and it burns hotter every day.

J

Edited by jbasser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VARO rater wrote in my denial letter; "Your military service treatment records show no complaint, treatment or diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder". LOL, LOL. I was out of the army in1968. PTSD wasn't even recognized by the VA, or medical community. until 1980. I'm sure when I bring this to the DRO's attention, He/she will weasel out of it with a dismissive, "Oh that was probably just a typo."

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use