Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Finally! Some Success With The Vietnam Veteran I've Been Helping...

Rate this topic


Troy Spurlock

Recommended Posts

"Only stickler is the VA is short changing him still on the award date on June 2009 when we actually filed the request/appeal in January 2008. So we're still going to argue that one; and the word is still out on the chloracne and left knee S/C."

Fight that all the way!!!!!! I see they are doping that more and more these days- making the award but with the wrong EED.

I assume this claim has been continuously prosecuted since the date they got the claim? The EED should be the date of the claim.

Chlorance- if due to dioxin- will be-as you know - VERY difficult.

I have never seen any chloracne-AO claims succeed.

There is a vet in one of the vet orgs on line I belong to-who claims he has IMOs from environmental docs- associating his current chloracne with dioxin from Vietnam.

Last I heard he was still appealing their denials.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know I have a buddy who was on SSD for ten years for his SC disability which the VA rated 50%. It was not until he filed for IU and sent in two IMO's that they gave him 100%. The VA knew he was on SSD, but just ignored the fact he could not work in his rating. He never claimed IU but it was clearly inferred from him being on SSD. The VA did not apologise to him. They first accused him of doctor shopping to the the 100%. He had panic and PTSD so bad he took his family to the wilderness to live to get away from people. Maybe he should ask for EED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John, inferred claim would need to have records and a followup claim. Did the vet get Cfile and medical records to review for possible inferred claim? Don't give up easy now.

Best to ya,

Cg

quote name='john999' date='Sep 13 2009, 11:27 AM' post='165809']

You know I have a buddy who was on SSD for ten years for his SC disability which the VA rated 50%. It was not until he filed for IU and sent in two IMO's that they gave him 100%. The VA knew he was on SSD, but just ignored the fact he could not work in his rating. He never claimed IU but it was clearly inferred from him being on SSD. The VA did not apologise to him. They first accused him of doctor shopping to the the 100%. He had panic and PTSD so bad he took his family to the wilderness to live to get away from people. Maybe he should ask for EED.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

An inferred claim for IU would be valid if the VA knew via SSD records or other records in the VA's possession that the vet could not work due to his SC disability.

That is right out of the VBM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Right, I hear you. But connecting the paperwork, records, files and what have you is needed to prove it all up. What's your next step? I love hearing success stories - each corrected compensation claim is a win for everyone but most importantly the veteran in need.

Don't give in if you know and can prove it right!

Yeehaw,

Cg

An inferred claim for IU would be valid if the VA knew via SSD records or other records in the VA's possession that the vet could not work due to his SC disability.

That is right out of the VBM.

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use