Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
diabetes Roanoke- Disgraceful
Rate this question
-
Similar Content
-
diabetes I am seeking information concerning possible herbicide(s) stored, used and spilled on Asco 1 2
By Gopher,
- 9 answers
- 2,237 views
-
- 11 answers
- 3,160 views
-
Reopen Diabetes II or file secondary to Hypoythyroid
By L2dee2,
- diabetes
- diabetes secondary to hypothyroid
- (and 8 more)
- 5 answers
- 2,292 views
-
- 27 answers
- 16,361 views
-
Question
Berta
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/01/mili...stakes_012010w/
Rick Maze -of Army Times summarized the IG report here- I have had problems finding the right report at VA Watchdog-
will check later-
I think this deficient work is becoming the status quo at many ROs and I wonder what-if anything- could result from these findings- are the vet's informed their claim can be re opened due to errors?
The DM II CAD vet who was initially denied because they didn't "properly consider" his IMO- does the IG realize that too is SOP for MANY MANY vets and widows.
I am outraged by this stuff and I know you all are. We are literally being victimized by incompetents.I also wonder what follow up the IG will do as to their findings and recommendations to Roanoke.This is one big reason that vets should never give up their claims as there could have been many errors that -if they had not occurred- would have possibly generated an award.
I get livid over AO vets denied due to errors-I told NVLSP 2 weeks ago I fully believed that VA was still starting to deliberately manipulate AO claims in order not to pay them as they got caught doing in the late 1990s.They know how this was done in my case recently but I sure cant be the only one-But what motivation could they have? or are they just plain dumb.
With medical proof of a documented AO disability and proof of exposure- an AO claim could take mere seconds to be decided and then follow through with the award paperwork.
AO is one sole chemical entity that has disabled and caused the deaths of thousands and thousands of vets.For Decades-since the war. The VA has no other single disability I know of except may for PTSD that has caused so much damage (as well as serious additional complications and medical issues) as AO has caused to exposed veterans.What motivates the VA to award AO comp to a vet who wasn't exposed to AO at all and then try to steal comp from a real AO vet.
Steal is a strong word-
but if you deliberately take something that legally belongs to someone- that is theft in my book.
It almost sounds like they made a deal with a SO on this situation- as hard as that would be to believe.(yeah right-some of these errors have got to stem from collusion -as an SSOC I have- revealed in my opiniopn and I made a stink with OGC on that.
I wonder if these IG reports actually get results on the specific claims they find have been done wrong.I guess I should ask the IG directly about that (and ask when they are coming to inspect the Buffalo VARO)
In part the article from Rick reads:
"Investigators looking at claims processing at the VA regional office in Roanoke, Va., found that 25 percent of the case files they closely studied had serious mistakes. Some veterans were denied benefits they deserved, and disability compensation was given to others who were not eligible"
"In one case, a veteran was underpaid $21,857 because the claims staff did not properly consider a physician’s opinion that coronary artery disease was a complication of service-connected diabetes.
In another, a veteran was overpaid $15,640 for a diabetes-related amputation below the knee that he said was related to exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. His claims folder contained no evidence that he had served in Vietnam, the IG report says."
"The report, released late last week, found similar problems with claims involving traumatic brain injuries."
<a name="ygrp-msg1">
<a href="http://" target="_blank"></a> "Thirty percent of the desks inspected contained information that should not have been left unsecured. Investigators found six boxes of unsecured returned mail, about 4,200 pieces in all, containing personal information on veterans"
Edited by BertaGRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
3
2
1
Popular Days
Jan 23
7
Jan 21
6
Jan 24
2
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 6 posts
jerrbilly 3 posts
Pete53 2 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 23 2010
7 posts
Jan 21 2010
6 posts
Jan 24 2010
2 posts
14 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now