Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Automatic Rating Decision Update?

Rate this question


Spent warrior

Question

I was surprised to get a letter from the VA that turned out to be a new Rating Dicision regarding my PTSD (which I got rated for the first time last November). I have times where I am suicidal and once in November and once in January I ended up in the locked down mental health ward for days.

From reading the document (two page white letter, accompanied by numersous green pages) it seems that if some other evidense about me is out there the VA takes a look to see if it affects my rating. The decision was that my rating stays at 70%. The green letter kind of tells me why I am rated at what I am, and what it takes for 100%, which they say I am not qualified for.

I was very surprised, and I guess concerned. I sure don't want to loose what I have and now I worry that if I get help for something they might come back and use it against me to knock down my rating. Does this happen?

Thank you,

Spent Warrior

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do you have IU. I cant understand why the VA did not consider IU in your case.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are OIF OEF vet I think maybe this generated the letter:

"Vets With PTSD May Get Benefits Upgrade

January 25, 2010

Associated Press

WASHINGTON --- The military has agreed to expedite a review of the records

of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans discharged with post-traumatic

stress disorder to determine whether they were improperly denied benefits.

The agreement stems from a judge's order in a class action lawsuit

originally filed by seven combat veterans who alleged the military illegally

denied health care and other benefits to those discharged because of the

disorder during a six-year period that ended Oct. 14, 2008.

Legal notices are currently being mailed to about 4,300 veterans informing

them that they can "opt-in" to the lawsuit until July 24 to participate in

the expedited review. Attorneys for the veterans estimate that millions

could be paid to veterans under the agreement, with some veterans receiving

hundreds or more dollars in increased monthly benefits.

The National Veterans Legal Services Program was to discuss the suit at a

press conference Monday.

Former Army Sgt. Juan Perez, 36, of Owosso, Mich., said the resolution of

the suit filed in 2008 in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims was a relief.

Perez, a father of five who did two tours in Iraq, said he struggles with

migraine headaches and an eye injury related to a head injury sustained in

Baghdad. He also has nightmares and takes medication for his mood related to

PTSD.

Since he left the military, he said he and his wife were laid off from their

jobs and declared bankruptcy, in part because of medical bills from the

birth of his two youngest kids.

"I'm glad that they are finally moving forward and re-evaluating the

Soldiers that need to be re-evaluated and doing the right thing," Perez

said. "It's been kind of a struggle not only for myself but a lot of

individuals that didn't get what they were supposed to get in the first

place."

PTSD is an anxiety disorder that can develop after a terrifying event where

the person was physically harmed or felt threatened. Symptoms range from

flashbacks to problem drinking.

The lawsuit addresses the issue of the disability rating given by the

military to veterans discharged with PTSD. Each of the seven plaintiffs was

given a rating of 10 percent or less.

The law requires the military to assign a disability rating of at least 50

percent to those discharged for PTSD, said Bart Stichman, co-executive

director the National Veterans Legal Services Program, a nonprofit

organization that represents the veterans. Since October 2008, the military

has given the 50 percent rating to those discharged with PTSD, Stichman

said.

The higher rating ensures that the veteran receives lifelong monthly

disability payments, free health care for the veteran and the veteran's

spouse, as well as health care for the veteran's minor children.

If a veteran qualifies for a higher disability rating, they may receive back

pay as well as reimbursement for health care expenses.

© Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved."

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The military will get around this in the future by kicking PTSD vets out as personality disorders, so they don't have to pay the 50%. This is what the army did in my day to all those with emotional disorders to avoid disability pensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use