Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Alan Simpson Has His Knives Sharpened For Agent Orange Victims

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Alan Simpson Has His Knives Sharpened for Agent Orange Victims

September 3, 2010 posted by Michael Leon ·

- Oh, I’m sorry, are our veterans’ illnesses inconvenient for you, Alan Simpson? -

By Steve Benen in the Washinton Monthly

MAYBE ALAN SIMPSON SHOULD ENJOY A LITTLE QUIET TIME FOR A WHILE…. It was encouraging to see the Obama administration make it easier for veterans affected by Agent Orange to receive disability payments. This is a worthwhile move, and it reinforces the fact that this administration is committed to doing right by those who wear the uniform.

It was far less encouraging when Alan Simpson decided it was a good time to start mouthing off again.

The system that automatically awards disability benefits to some veterans because of concerns about Agent Orange seems contrary to efforts to control federal spending, the Republican co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s deficit commission said Tuesday.

Former Wyoming Sen. Alan Simpson’s comments came a day after The Associated Press reported that diabetes has become the most frequently compensated ailment among Vietnam veterans, even though decades of research has failed to find more than a possible link between the defoliant Agent Orange and diabetes.

"The irony (is) that the veterans who saved this country are now, in a way, not helping us to save the country in this fiscal mess," said Simpson, an Army veteran who was once chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

Oh, I’m sorry, are our veterans’ illnesses inconvenient for you, Alan Simpson?

Simpson’s opinions matter, of course, because he’s currently the co-chair of the White House’s bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which is considering a variety of areas of the budget that may need "trimming." It’s also the second time in as many weeks as the former Republican senator has caused a stir with his big mouth — last week, in a letter he later apologized for, Simpson compared Social Security to a "milk cow with 310 million tits."

While I appreciate this was arguably a crude take on a common metaphor, the remarks raised legitimate questions, not only about Simpson’s temperament and judgment, but also about his commitment to the Social Security system.

And now he’s at it again.

As for the substance of Simpson’s concerns, Zaid Jilani notes, "Given that the VA estimates that providing care for veterans exposed to Agent Orange would cost only $67 billion over the next decade, it is difficult to imagine why Simpson would see the program as prime for cost-cutting."

 

 

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/09/03/alan-simpson-has-his-knives-sharpened-for-agent-orange-victims/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Simpson is part of the group in America that believes that the old, children and the disabled should pay to help finance the banks and Wall Street gangsters. It is fine for the tax payers to finance the gigantic crap game in our financial markets, but not one penny for the poor or disabled. That makes people dependent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can find any answer to any question in Washington.

And flipping is a popular hobby.

Personally, I believe the Simpson character has a powerful group behind him and his disregard for Veteran's health care.

All politicians have an obligation to whoever financed their election campaigns.

Even the un-elected ones will usually have enough residual influence to be noticed when make-work political jobs are up for grabs.

After serving one term in office, everybody in both houses have their pensions set-up for life.

While serving, the elected all have to turn over their business interests to somebody else while the elected person serves.

That makes the politician a silent partner in their own business interest.

An easy way to boost their bottom line is to leave the business set-up alone after becoming un-elected and go out among'm to find something else to do.

LOBBYING.

Use their 'gift of the gab' to influence to disrespect the disabled, after they became disabled while in service to their country, is a favorite way of getting noticed by the lobbyists who are always looking for a new and better mouthpiece.

One of the more popular arguments against disabled veterans is telling how badly those lazy veterans are getting money that they don't deserve, keeping other more deserving vets from getting their own legitimately earned benefits.

Even if fraud were actually a real problem caused by faking disabled veterans, which it's not, thousands of fraudulent claimants, which have never been identified, would not and could not effect the earned benefits of 'one' other veteran.

The 'veteran's fraud issue' simply does not exist.

The Department of Veterans Affairs 'employees fraud' has been shown to exist in many different cases.

The system is being worked by it's own employees, not the veterans that the system is supposed to be caring for.

Benefits FRAUD does not effect the availability of VA benefits to anybody.

But, by making this non-issue something to cause the population to worry about, politicians working for their own individual concerns are reporting a highly exaggerated problem and strongly insinuating the wrong group as the only possible, responsible party.

There ain't no priority list that describes the order in which individual veterans get their benefits.

However, there is an almost 'religious observation' of the 'BUDGET' as the politicians lie to explain why veterans are not being medically treated and generally deprived of their earned benefits.

By law, the so-called budget is only a rough guideline and is subject to modification at the whim of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

Veterans are obviously not milking the system with any kind of fraud and the VA employee fraud is a negligible influence upon the total amount of funds available to the VA system for medical treatment and 'wages lost' compensation.

Simpson is paid to make us look bad and we do not deserve that kind of description from anyone, particularly from someone associated with the government.

Simpson is a talented liar who has no respect for anyone other than himself.

Dangle a check in front of him and he will inadvertently blurt out, "Who do I have to kill".

Pictures of money probably cause him to break out in a sweat.

Simpson is not identifying a problem or offering a solution to a problem.

He is the problem.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

DARN, Sledge! That was a very well written and insightful observation. I'd like to send that to my congressman, Sam Johnson...........he would enjoy it, I'm sure!

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It is the duty of young high school graduates to be killed and wounded so that men like Simpson can continue to enjoy the fruits of this great democracy. Veterans should be proud to be able to offer up their bodies as a sacrifice to their betters. Ungrateful rabble!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use