Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Without Medication

Rate this question


bigoc

Question

2 questions

1. If I meet the 50% rating criteria, is it reasonable to expect this rating without being place on any type of medication relating to the condition? I tried zoloft a few years ago and did not like the results. I have not been on any medication for this condition for a few years. I have found better results through counseling only without medication.

Can the VA use my TBI finding that I am SC for to explain away PTSD? I am looking at the memory part of the rating criteria and it looks like that is a significant portion of the 50% rating.

My in service combat stressor is pretty solid so I do not have to much concern with that area of the claim. This process happens at the same time (SC finding and rating) so I want to be prepared and able to defend it with a solid initial claim and avoid as much of the back and forth NOD as possible. I have had problems in the past with private doc's writting a finding and having the VA explain away the claim somehow. Then I have to jump through hoops to finally prove my case. I know this is sometime the reality but I would like to be prepared. If anyone has experienced the VA using the TBI finding(memory issues) for VA benefit to deny a PTSD claim please fill me in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If I was dealing with the VA I would accept drugs from VA shrink. I would then just make a decision on my own about taking them. To be honest I think the VA does believe that vets who take drugs are more compliant and are better patients than those that don't. If you are compliant in all areas and still suffer significant symptoms I think that might show you are worse off than someone who does not take drugs. For instance, if you are trying to get rated for a chronic pain condition and you take morphine I think the VA would rate you higher than someone who does not take any pain killer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If I was dealing with the VA I would accept drugs from VA shrink. I would then just make a decision on my own about taking them. To be honest I think the VA does believe that vets who take drugs are more compliant and are better patients than those that don't. If you are compliant in all areas and still suffer significant symptoms I think that might show you are worse off than someone who does not take drugs. For instance, if you are trying to get rated for a chronic pain condition and you take morphine I think the VA would rate you higher than someone who does not take any pain killer.

..........or, as my PCP has pointed out to me (when they did the "drug test" at one of my first PCP appointments): "We prescribe you codeine because of your devastating injury to your body, and, if you do NOT take the prescribed medications, then all we can do is to show you as a "non-compliant" patient who does not do his best to help himself, and, if that is the case, then please do not ask me to help you gain a higher percentage rating..........................". I now make SURE that, even though I can "sometimes" do without taking my drugs, simply because I have learned to cope without them on an occasional basis, that, when I DO have PCP appointments, that I arrive with the requisite level of medication "on board".

..........just sayin'

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have made a choice to forgo any meds and I have managed quite well. My question is not about my decision not to take the meds. I was curious as to what anyone thought of how the va would rate such a person.

bigoc,

I don't know if you were able to read this part of my reply to you that I

posted earlier, so I will post it again.

There are two considerations in the schedule for rating mental health disability's,

that specifically consider medications for treatment of the MH disability itself.

Occupational and social impairment due to mild or

transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency

and ability to perform occupational tasks only

during periods of significant stress, or; symptoms

controlled by continuous medication... 10 percent

A mental condition has been formally diagnosed,

but symptoms are not severe enough either to interfere

with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication... 0 percent

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bigoc, I did not meazn any disrespect whatsoever. I was not referring to Firefighter and/or Police Officers in total, but on an individual basis. Each one must make that decision to whether or not they can perform their jobs with PTSD and any other mental aliment as far as that is concerned. This can also apply to any job. Mine got to the point that I could no longer perform my job as I was getting violent, having panic attacks, afriaid to sleep. If, you are able to perform you job, that is great.

Papa

I almost removed my career from the post I wrote after I read it. I left it in as I did not think it would garner so much attention. I have made a choice to forgo any meds and I have managed quite well. My question is not about my decision not to take the meds. I was curious as to what anyone thought of how the va would rate such a person.

I will say, if I can do so kindly, that the concerns here are not on target. I do not mean that in a personal way but, a great deal of veteran police officers in this country are suffering from some sort of PTSD. They have guns and somehow they make do most of the time. So I will respectfully disagree with the concern of a firefighter performing their job while being diagnosed with PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost removed my career from the post I wrote after I read it. I left it in as I did not think it would garner so much attention. I have made a choice to forgo any meds and I have managed quite well. My question is not about my decision not to take the meds. I was curious as to what anyone thought of how the va would rate such a person.

I will say, if I can do so kindly, that the concerns here are not on target. I do not mean that in a personal way but, a great deal of veteran police officers in this country are suffering from some sort of PTSD. They have guns and somehow they make do most of the time. So I will respectfully disagree with the concern of a firefighter performing their job while being diagnosed with PTSD.

bigoc,

OK - lets get real here.

You titled your topic :

" Ptsd Without Medication is 50% a realistic PTSD rating without medication"

This question was specifically answered with support directly from the rating criteria for mental health.

Medications are only addressed at the zero or 10 percent level.

OK now lets look at the criteria for a 50 % mental health rating just to see, if as you asked, "is 50 % a realistic PTSD rating without medication".

Sec. 4.130 Schedule of ratings--mental disorders.

Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week;

difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood;

difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships ... 50

Now, did you read those symptoms - once PTSD is granted as SC'd the symptoms above are whats considered for a 50 % rating.Nothing at all in there concerning medications.

A claimant does not have to exhibit every one of the symptoms above BUTmust meet the majority of those symptoms.

You posted, " I will say, if I can do so kindly, that the concerns here are not on target. I do not mean that in a personal way but, a great deal of veteran police officers in this country are suffering from some sort of PTSD. They have guns and somehow they make do most of the time. So I will respectfully disagree with the concern of a firefighter performing their job while being diagnosed with PTSD."

Believe me, if you are a firefighter the VA will know this.

It would certainly be mentioned somewhere in your VA/VAMC or private practice medical records.

Now I certainly will agree that there are many, many police officers "suffering from some sort of PTSD".

I will follow up by stating the majority of the ones that don't want a desk job just continue to "suffer"from their undiagnosed and untreated PTSD because due simply from having a diagnosis of PTSD along with much of the symptomology listed in the criteria above -

their job would turn to crap.

If a firefighter or a leo has medical evidence of meeting the above symptomology, yes their superiors will certainly want to be aware of it because in being public servants - they are liable for the loose cannons underneath them.

Some states do not even allow a CCW permit with the above medical evidence being of record.

I am sorry if you feel any of this is related directly towards you -

it is in direct relation to the VA'srating criteria for a 50 percent level of mental health compensation.

If your employment requires you to do things that you are unable to do - because of a service connected disability -

that's the reason VA has to pay the cash - plain and simple.

After all do you feel it would be fair for a claimant to collect both ways

1) in VA comp

2) for only being able to do only parts of the job

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advise. As for the VA find out that I am firefighter, I have put that information in my other claims. I do not lie about any portion of my claims, not a single part. I was referring to removing my career from this post as I have now seen where it has gone.

I can see the "anti-100% combined schedular and still working" crowd is still in full force here.

I think this post shows the delusion that some in our society have about the world we live in and the people around us. There are people in all walks of life, including public employees with PTSD that are still able to preform their jobs with out endangering themselves or the citizens they serve. There are "loose canons" in public service that have never seen anything even close to combat and do not have metal conditions and still they act out with violence just because they had a bad day and could not control themselves. Point is, PTSD effects every one differently and you can not place people into nice, neat little boxes of what they can and can not do in life.

Getting a disability rating and working is not unreasonable even at 100%, if it is combined. Many of the VA rating are based on physical effect and or test results(neuro-psych exam). If you fit the rating of several ratings who is to say that all of the sudden when it hits 100% combined you are doing something wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use