Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Bout This

Rate this question


Carl the Engineer

Question

So, spinning my wheels, waiting on my current claim to be rated, I re-read my VA medical records for the third time.

In the radiology report for my original claims C&P (11/2009) for HTN (hypertension) I read this;

HTN please note heart size

Heart size is normal. Thoracic aorta is dense and tortuous.

Diaphragmatic outlines are well defined. Lungs are clear.

Degenerative changes in the thoracic spine.

I took note at that last sentence because the VA recently took it upon themselves to SC my neck for DDD (a month ago), when I tried to have it seconded to my shoulder injury. The VA doc stated that my necks limited movement was not related to my shoulder, however, I had DDD of the neck, because of a x-ray and that it had to have occurred during active duty because what he saw could not have developed in the last two years. I was SC at a 20% rate for limited ROM.

I have and have had for a long time lower back pain at a mild to moderate level, however, never filed anything because I figured it was because I was getting older, etc.

I believe I could/should claim for DDD of the thoracic/lumbar spine (I read that they are rated together and separately from the cervical spine) because it would show DDD (arthritis) and it would have had to occur while in the service.

As a side note, the claim that I am waiting for was referred because my exam for and increase for tendenopathy for my right shoulder, the doc commented in his diagnosis arthritis in both shoulders (as least as likely). So, I know I have arthritis and can make that an issue with my back.

What do you think?

Hamslice

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I was told I would nto be able to get my cervical spine service connected as secondary to my lumber spine.

I went to the doc and got a letter stating that the DDD in my cervical spine was at least as likely as not caused by the DDD in my lumbar spine.

Service connection was granted at 10% for my cervical spine.

I am going to have my entire spine x-rayed for DDD. I have pain in the center of my back that is tender to the touch during an exam... If an xray shows DDD there, I am going to file on it.

If you are having low back pain, sounds like you need to also have your lumbar spine looked at.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to recall reading somewhere that VA rates the entire spine at a minimum level rating of atleast 40 or 50% if DDD occurs in the entire spinal system.

I may be wrong about that... I am only rated at 10% lumbar and 10% cervical... I have more pain in my lumbar spine but I have VERY limmited range of motion in my neck.... I feel that the 10% is a lowball figure.

I am hopeful that if I can get my middle spine rated, perhaps my overall rating will increase. Overall rating for the spine that is.

In other words.... I believe that "if I read it right", even if that rate my middle spine at 10% also, it would not add up to 30% for my spine.. I think.. I THINK the rating is more like 40% - 50%, or mabey even 60% if the entire spine is affected by DDD.

I am going to try to go see several docs this summer to arm myself with letter to assist me with my next claims. Middle spine being one of them.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read how they rate the entire spine for DDD. Will have to look that up.

However, like you, I think if you have DDD (arthritis) in two of your spine sections (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), you would have it in the third. I believe, if the x-ray shows it you get 10%, and then you get more for ROM. And I had thought that they combined the thoracic and lumbar together. Again, don't know about an entire spine rating?

Hamslice

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ham.. I may be wrong about that. It's been a LONG TIME since I read it.

Let me know in this thread if you find anything on it abnd I will try to look it up also.

About getting more for ROM... I don't know about that... I guess it depends on how bad it is. I only have 10% each for lumbar and cervical.. Infact.... I have am service connected for 8 different issues. All of them at 10% each for a total of 60%.

I would ahve thought that my neck would qualify for a higher rating based on ROM but again, I only recived 60%.

Also... I don't think the middle spine will show much in the way of ROM.. Not like the neck and lower back would. I don't think the middle spine moves very much but again.. I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sawgunner,

I have a hard time moving my neck to the right, and was rated 20% DDD because of limited ROM.

I would say after your last response (8 at 10% for 60%), that you were probably "low balled" on at least one if not more of your original claims. I was 4 at 10% the first go around.

Filed for a increase in one and 2 secondaries and got 20% each on the two secondaries and am still waiting on the increase. Which, from what I can tell will be a increase, just don't know how much.

So, if you think you were underrated on one or you have one that has gotten worse, file a claim for a increase. Of course it helps to go to the doctor first.

Hamslice

Also, from what I read so far, 2 things, ROM is the key to the ratings, and, MRI is preferred for showing DDD vs the x-ray.

I'll have to see my doc (I think she is a nurse practitioner) at the VA Clinic and see if she will schedule me for a spine MRI. Ha, ha...

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have DDD of Cervical Spine. Just a note, most of my midback pain is actually cervical in nature. Nerve roots on facet joints aggravated at Cervical level causing muscle spasm referred pain to shoulders/Rhomboids. Where it hurts aint always where its injured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

So, spinning my wheels, waiting on my current claim to be rated, I re-read my VA medical records for the third time.

In the radiology report for my original claims C&P (11/2009) for HTN (hypertension) I read this;

HTN please note heart size

Heart size is normal. Thoracic aorta is dense and tortuous.

Diaphragmatic outlines are well defined. Lungs are clear.

Degenerative changes in the thoracic spine.

I took note at that last sentence because the VA recently took it upon themselves to SC my neck for DDD (a month ago), when I tried to have it seconded to my shoulder injury. The VA doc stated that my necks limited movement was not related to my shoulder, however, I had DDD of the neck, because of a x-ray and that it had to have occurred during active duty because what he saw could not have developed in the last two years. I was SC at a 20% rate for limited ROM.

I have and have had for a long time lower back pain at a mild to moderate level, however, never filed anything because I figured it was because I was getting older, etc.

I believe I could/should claim for DDD of the thoracic/lumbar spine (I read that they are rated together and separately from the cervical spine) because it would show DDD (arthritis) and it would have had to occur while in the service.

As a side note, the claim that I am waiting for was referred because my exam for and increase for tendenopathy for my right shoulder, the doc commented in his diagnosis arthritis in both shoulders (as least as likely). So, I know I have arthritis and can make that an issue with my back.

What do you think?

Hamslice

Your XRAY was a CXR or chest Xray. They were looking at the size of the heart.

You need a cervical MRI to show any changes to the Neck.

As far as a nexus involving the T spine to the C spine, You should research some BVA decisions on the issues.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use