Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd - Va Does Not Recognize Private Diagnosis

Rate this question


Apple

Question

I was Diagnosed with severe PTSD with panic disorder, social/work impairment and personality disorder one year ago by a private psychologist. <br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break">

I have been unable to work since that time due to PTSD and other medical conditions. Although I have been suffering with the symptoms of PTSD, for a long time, and out of the service since 1999, I have just recently filed a claim with the VA for my PTSD.

I had my C&P examfor PTSD in March. It went as such:

I was greeted with a typical 'how are you' when meeting the examiner. Then, the examiner said that he thought I was an army vet, to which I stated "no, I was Navy". The examiner asked a variety of questions, including "do you have a stressor"? - to which I responded "yes". Note: the examiner never asked me to elaborate on my stressor during this exam. After approximately 110 minutes with the examiner, the exam concluded.

I requested and obtained a copy of the C&P exam by mail a few weeks later. I noted that the answers I gave were not those that the examiner recorded, but were mostly the opposite to the answers I gave during the exam. The C&P examiner's results stated that I do not have PTSD because I do not meet the DSM IV criteria for a PTSD diagnosis. However, my daily condition supports nearly all the affects and symptoms of PTSD, and my private psychologist confirms this in his diagnosis.

Although I was not involved in direct gunfire, I am a combat vet, and have several stressors that were considered life threatening.

My questions:

1) Will not having a diagnosis of PTSD by the C&P examiner stop my claim for PTSD regardless of the supporting evidence?

2) Seeing that I was given a C&P exam for PTSD, does that mean that my stressor was accepted?

3) Does branch of service stressor play a role in whether one is diagnosed for PTSD by the VA? If so, how?

4) Is it possible to get another C&P exam for PTSD before my claim moves to the next stage?

This C&P exam has me believing that the examiner failed to look at private medical records, and made everything up. I sure don't want a denial based upon a bogus C&P exam.

Thoughts..

Apples

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Obviously, you will need to file a notice of disagreement.

It is possible to get the VA to do another C&P. Without knowing all the circumstances, I'd be at a loss as to the best way to get such a thing done.

Actually, if a C&P examiner files such an "untrue" document as you describe, the examiner has potentially defrauded not only the veteran, but the government as well.

There are ways to file a complaint, although getting it addressed can be quite a problem.

I did personally encounter some discrimination against the Navy in the process of VA fighting denials. Mainly, it was a VSO or a lawyer that did not want to take a claim/case based upon Navy service.

To some, all Navy Vietnam veterans are "Blue Water" veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If C&P examiners found everyone disabled, they'd be out of a job.

So- obviously, they are biased.

I, too, have seen records that made me think they were for another veteran.

Submit all of your evidence for PTSD as your best legal argument.

Good luck! :smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I do think the VA is trying to limit the number of claims for PTSD. The word has come down that unless a vet meets all the criteria he/she does not have PTSD. Nobody meets all the criteria. Leaving the VA in charge of DXing PTSD is like putting the fox in the henhouse. The are going to stall as long as they can because they save money. Even if you win on appeal they have been able to hold onto your compensation for a couple of extra years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

is this familiar

I got SW Asia Service Medal. (Not accepted evidence of PTSD)

What I have are actually ship's logs that place the ship at a certain date. I back the ship's logs up with evaluations etc. that cover that period. (Where is the stressor.....????)

I also have specific surguries with medical evidence that place my body at a specific place. Those did not occur in a combat zone, but i'm hoping that being a combat vet overrides this. (Forget the "combat veteran"....you did NOT see or engage in any combat)

My stressor was not specifically a navy combat, but all service. It was during the first gulf war. where there were wide-spread exposure to bio and chemical hazards in the Persian Gulf. I had transport duties to and from airports and various other destinations in the area, which exposed me to many hazards. It was considered a combat zone similar to today's war in Iraq. (You will need verifiable exposures and very specific incidents.....otherwise you are pissing up as rope and into the wind)

I have read that stressors can occur anytime during service. Not just during combat. (They can indeed....but where are these stressors? Not trying to bust your chops, but thus far, you asked questions and provided no specifics, other than you served aboard ship and had no combat, yet insist you are a combat vet?....Get specific or we cannot address this!))

you can change names but the facts still are the same

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is because the New PTSD regs were skillfully worded to f--- PTSD veterans.

Please read my posts here on the new regs and the challenge before the court to them.

This is a good reason why vets should take the time to check out any proposed VA rules and regulations at the Federal Register site.

Although vets, advocates, lawyers, etc griped about this part of the regs as to only a VA MH can diagnosis, I dont think there were much more than 600 comments on this unfair new regulation.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is this familiar

you can change names but the facts still are the same

test,

Yes, I caught it too.

Check your PM's.

There are more issues with this claim than a private diagnosis

of PTSD.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use