Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dh's Big Brown Envelope Came.... I Don't Know What To Think.

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

He's at work. I called & told him it came - he said open it, but he has a meeting so he'll call me back to hear what it says.

They gave him 100% for PTSD as a new rating. He's working, and has been all along. He's a civil engineer, and admittedly, they've been giving him less and less responsibility over the past couple years. He's got the most seniority and experience, so he's kind of the grey-beard who points out problems waiting to happen, and answers the questions of the young'ns when they get stuck.

He likes his job. He gets into it with people, but he's working hard on not getting into conflicts.

Ack, I'm babbling.

Will he have to stop working because of this rating? All his VA doctors, shrinks, therapists, all know that he's employed. He told the psychologist who did his rating exam that he is currently employed.

He'll be heartbroken if he has to quit or retire. His job is his identity. He'll be crushed if this means he's "too broken" to be DH the engineer.

:(

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Sorry, Carlie, the soup didn't last. He woke up long enough to scarf it down, then went back to sleep. Today he's at work, at a loss 'cause he's called 4 times. I've been down with the same cough, but better so can't grumble.

His Decision Letter is very simple. No narrative, like past ones have had, just bullets.

It says (paraphrasing for formatting purposes):

" What We Decided...

We determined that the following condition was related to your military service, co service connection has been granted:

Medical Description: PTSD to inclued major depressive disorder without paranoid features

Percent Assigned: 100%

Effective Date: Oct 21, 2011

Basic eligibility to DEA is established from 10/21/2011.

Your over or combined rating is 100%. We do not add the individual percentages of each condition to determine your combined rating.

We enclosed a VA Form 21-8760 "Additional Information for Veterans with Service-Connected Permanent & Total Disability," which explains certain factors concerning benefits.

This portion goes on to talk about life insurance, student loan discharge, etc.

The next part, with the VA seal on it says he has DEA from 10/21/2011.

The evidence they used is listed and the C&P exam, then there is this portion:

We have assigned a 100 percent evaluation for you PTSD to include major depressive disorder without paranoid features based on:

Persistent delusion (flashbacks)

Persistent hallucinations (flashbacks)

Impaired impulse control

Obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities

Suicidal ideation

Occupational & social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity

Flattened affect

Anxiety

Chronic sleep impairment

Depressed mood

Mild memory loss

Panic attacks (weekly)

Suspisiousness

Your GAF score is 48. A range of 41-50 indicates serious symptoms, or any serious impairment in social, occupational or school functioning.

The overall evidentiary record shows that the severity of your disability most closely approximates the criteria for 100% disability. This is the highest evaluation allowed under the law for this condition.

I called our VSO yesterday, and she suggested DH strongly consider retiring, or at least reducing his hours if his boss will let him go part time. She didn't sound sure of herself, so I called the VA itself and the representative said that since he was working when he filed, and all during the process, and he was clear with the examiner that he was working, he technically can continue to work. Since the findings are occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, it more or less falls onto DH's employer as to whether he's employable. He's not TDIU, he's scheduler, so it's kinda fuzzy.

I would love for DH to retire. Or maybe better, go for a medical retirement. Or just plain stop working and we will manage.

Our finances are not in good shape (us and what percent of the country?) but we could make ends meet.

And I could stop worrying about what the next phone call might be about...

Lol, the VA guy said "hey have him quit working and the two of you get yourselves an RV and go travel the country... see Mount Rushmore, etc.!!" Ummmmmm..... that would be really nice, but it's really, really not in the budget. DH getting 100% is going to relieve a lot of pressure, and we'll pay off some credit cards. Buy an RV? Not so much...

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hedgey, congrats on your man's rating. Its a good thing. If he can't work because of the rating, I'm sure he will have some other outlets to do something creative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hedgey,

I have been thinking of your husbands post ever since reading it yesterday. I am also 100%=SMCs but I was let go from my job when I told them I had PTSD and my percentage is only 50%. I am in my 60's too and I just said time to move on to something else and retire. I can't say it is all beds and roses but it is OK and I do try and stay active. The way I looked at it I have worked all my life and I now need to take care of myself so my wife and I can enjoy the future a little better.

With my VA and SSDI our budget is pretty decent and just told the credit cards here is what I can afford so that is it.

If your man has worked all his life while having this severe mental condition I am amazed! Please get him to slow down so you both can enjoy each other for a few years!

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use