Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Success

Rate this topic


peacecindia

Recommended Posts

7 years of fighting VA for mst/ptsd comp and they rated me at 50%

even though I get SSDI for chronic ptsd and have for the past 8 years.

I'm glad to be service connected, but cannot understand why I'm only

at 50%?

My gaf was 46 according to the c&p examiner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 years of fighting VA for mst/ptsd comp and they rated me at 50%

even though I get SSDI for chronic ptsd and have for the past 8 years.

I'm glad to be service connected, but cannot understand why I'm only

at 50%?

My gaf was 46 according to the c&p examiner.

Good gosh - I am thrilled to read it's finally been granted.

You've really hung in there.

The rating decision will tell you exactly why the decision provided

the evaluation at 50 percent and what criteria is necessary for a

higher evaluation.

If you have medical evidence that supports a higher level you can submit it and ask

for this evidence to be considered for a higher rating.

If you are going to submit a NOD on the evaluation, be sure to meet your

OFFICIAL time limit, to submit your NOD.

The GAF score is just one small factor of many might be considered

in the evaluation for percentage.

The evaluation criteria is here:

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=05e2a79c2e7fec470740fb48c38cdde6&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.2.111.73&idno=38

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Carlie & John for responding and yes both of you are right and on track...

My VA therapist I saw today told me the C&P examiner should have checked another box

instead of the one she did. (He went through the C&P exam I had in Dec. on his screen and also had

my copy of the SSOC I got today in front of him.)

Occupational area of functioning was the category. One of the boxes were checked and the therapist

told me it was the wrong one.

Hopefully, my lawyer will request another DRO review and I'll possibly get a chance to see

the VA psychiatrist next time for the next C&P exam.

*VA is connecting me back to March 2006.

Also, 'Thank you' Hadit members for being here for all these years!

I read many other veteran's stories here and knew I wasn't alone in the PTSD boat.

Edited by peacecindia
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use