Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is This Cue?

Rate this question


bigred1

Question

I am assiting a relative with his appeal. What do you think of this for CUE?

In Vietnam from 1966 to 1968

Attempted suicide in 1974, sent to the VA for 3 months. The only records in the cfile and that we can find are two one page summaries. One states that patient experienced feelings of depression since Vietnam in 1968. Diagnosed with depressive neurosis on discharge.

A claim was filed while he was in the hospital in 1974 for nevous condition.

It was denied stating "the service medical records are negative for anything refeable to the currently claimed disabilities." Also states "Veteran has submitted no medical evidence referable to either of the claimed conditions."

1985, he filed another claim, it was denied, he didn't show up for a medical exam.

2011 he files again, goes to his exam rated at 30%.

2012 files for increase, rated at 70% earlier this year.

We are currently appealing based on earlier effective date and also for TDIU.

My question is with regard to the earlier effective date, do you think we can file for CUE on the basis that they had his medical records from his VA stay for a suicide attempt?

Where can I find the regulations for how the evaluated claims back then? I know I have to find error with the law they applied back then, but I am having trouble trying to figure that out.

Thanks so much for any insight and guidance!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Regs from then are kept in public federal depositories located throught the nation. Your local library should be able to assist you in locating that info. I think you would have a better chance of winning if he has a current diagnosis of PTSD or something similiar. Back in the '70's they weren't required to explain their decisions the way they are now. Most law libraries would probably have them also.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regs from then are kept in public federal depositories located throught the nation. Your local library should be able to assist you in locating that info. I think you would have a better chance of winning if he has a current diagnosis of PTSD or something similiar. Back in the '70's they weren't required to explain their decisions the way they are now. Most law libraries would probably have them also.

pr

he is 70% right now ptsd. he was 30 then got 70 earlier this year. We are trying to get tdiu, he has another appointment coming up. I think it will go up then. After that I want to go after for earlier effective date. Just trying to understand it as much as I can so we can have the strongest case possible. Finding the regs from the 1970s has been a bit confusing. Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In his orginal denial did the VA address his social and occupation adjustment. I can tell you that in my 1973 rating the VA ignored evidence, did not consider my occupation adjustment (I wasn't working) and violated my due process rights. I would get a lawyer for this because if you want to try and say that his first hospitalization should have rung the VA's bell about his mental state and his service I think you need expert legal help. It would be worth it. In my own case the VA changed their rules as far as rating mental disorders in the middle of my claim. I found this out when my CUE hit the Court of Vet Appeals. I know what these old VA claims look like and they appear to have been done by retarded primates.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use