Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Service Connected At 0%. Please Help

Rate this question


McLain

Question

Hi all! Thank you for your service!

Husband was just rated at 0% for TBI, this is service connected but No compensation? He was also denied completely on his Epilepsy & shoulder dislocation. :unsure:

He was in Special ops, maybe his records were classified, which is why they couldnt compensate or put the two together, because they could not access records?

I am not sure how he can be rated service connected but 0%? TBI can later cause epilepsy, and clearly this happened to him. What do we do? We are trying to obtain his records that are now archived at ST. LOUIS, MO. and planning to get an atty. Anyone been through this? Since they do recognize the TBI, do you think the appeal process may be easier? Anyone w/ any input is much appreciated.

THANK YOU ALL ! :smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

We just looked at the letter and,

This was the main reason for denial on TBI- traumatic brain injury:

"No complains of impairment of memory, attention, concentration, or executive functions. Although the examination findings show a history of mild memory loss, the examiner stated this is due to a nonservice-connected mental disorder, and is not the result of your traumatic brain injury."

This is false. My husband has memory loss, has been treated for headache there at VA ER. The C&P examiner was his regular neurologist and has always thought we were lying to her or something, she is not the nicest!! We are so frustrated reading this! It kills me that she could say it is not related to TBI, how would she know this?

Wow I hope we can get a second opinion and this would be easy to appeal.

Where's the Reasons and Bases Section for the epilepsy and shoulder injury ?

Also, have you actually gotten a copy of the C&P exam to see if in fact

this is what the examiner stated and to see WHAT ELSE was stated that the decision maker

negated ?

I ask these things because I am SC'd for epilepsy / seizures, due to 3 documented / treated,concussions

on AD - these now fall under a TBI condition.

Please post exactly what remains from the Reasons and Bases Section and whether you have gotten

a copy of the actual exam to verify what the VA decision maker stated.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we need to read VA's exact words on the denial ,certainly as to the epilepsy because there is a strong association between TBIs and epilepsy as this study shows:

http://www.ninds.nih.gov/research/epilepsyweb/researchers/ICARE/VA_post-traumatic_epilepsy_member_rpt_062712.pdf

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go here and scroll down to FAST Letter 09-52 and download it. It request VA to seek your records for Special Ops. http://asknod.wordpress.com/va-forms/

Another thing you need to understand is that VA does not generously hand out top drawer ratings without a little nudging. If they think they can roll you and the medical evidence is "iffy" or allows for some wiggle room, they will lowball you every time. Rebut it by submitting the medrecs that support a higher rating. You also need to see the Diagnostic Code rating percentages on TBI to get a better idea where you fall in it. In the interim, if they sandbagged you with a couple of 0% ice creme cones with no ice creme, you are entitled to a 10% rating ( 38 CFR 3.324). Few know of that little trick.

§ 3.324

Multiple noncompensable service-connected disabilities.
Whenever a veteran is suffering from two or more separate permanent service-connected disabilities of such character as clearly to interfere with normal employability, even though none of the disabilities may be of compensable degree under the 1945 Schedule for Rating Disabilities the rating agency is authorized to apply a 10-percent rating, but not in combination with any other rating.
Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume from your statement about getting med records from St. Louis that you do not know what was in his SMR's when filling? I see the California National Guard emblem as your avatar/picture, have you checked with the unit (assuming you are NG) to see if they have any residual medical records that were not forwarded or do they have copies of what was forwarded (might be quicker than St. Louis). Actually, St. Louis would not have his medical records...they would be at the VARO (on loan from military archives...unless they have changed this with paperless system implementation).

Last and probably least likely, your husband wasn't on AD orders when the decision was made (temporary assignment). He isn't currently in NG is he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for responses.

Carlie/ Berta: the Reasons are as stated

SC for sizures/epilepsy:

The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service. Your service treatment recors do not contatin complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition. We received medical evidence from Martinez and Palo ALto VA MED Centers which discussed the symptoms of your medical condition ( which we treat at Mather VA now they didnt put that where most his records are) . The evidence does not show that your disease developed to a compensable degree within hte specified time period after release from service to qualify for the presumption of service connection. - Yes he started getting seizures a year or two after discharge

SC for dislocation, r. shoulder:

Your service treatment records show you injured your right shoulder in a motor vehicle accident in july93. We scheduled an exam for you to determine the current level of disability caused by this injury. The VA med. opinion found no link between your diagnosed medical condition and military service. The VA examiner stated that since there was no treatment for this injury following the initial treatment. Your reported suffering dislocations of your right shoulder following release from service, which the examiner stated is not consistent with the type of injury you suffered. The examiner stated your current right shoulder strain is most likely related to overuse and injuries of the r. shoulder which occurred after you left service. We received med. evidence from Martinez VA Med. Center which discusses the symptoms of your medical condition.

This shoulder thing is not a big deal, he sometimes gets flare ups but not too bad. It is the epilepsy and TBI and PTSD (not cliamed) that is the worst and really effecting his ability to daily living you know.

No Carlie unfortunately we do not have any copies of those C&P exams, any idea how to obtain them?

Also, it sounds like you may have went through a somewhat similar situation being your condition, Did you have to appeal as well? Was it a very hard/long process ?

Edited by McLain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use