Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Certification Of Appeal

Rate this question


MPsgt

Question

The VARO just posted a Certification of Appeal dated 07/23/2013 for my TDIU claim. They've been working the claim just about two years already. My Veterans Service Officer was trying to get a DRO before it ever left for BVA. At this point, is it already to late to get the DRO. If it is, I'm up the creek without a paddle for two to three years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The VARO just posted a Certification of Appeal dated 07/23/2013 for my TDIU claim. They've been working the claim just about two years already. My Veterans Service Officer was trying to get a DRO before it ever left for BVA. At this point, is it already to late to get the DRO. If it is, I'm up the creek without a paddle for two to three years!

"Up the creek for two to three years". In order for your appeal to be certified to bva you had to have submitted a Form 9. The date that you signed that Form 9 is the docket date you will receive when your files are actually received at the bva. Keep in mind also that if you have sent in any new evidence to the varo while waiting on that dro review, and the varo has not issused a soc or ssoc on that new evidence BEFORE actually sending the files to bva then you really are screwed. This forces bva to remand for procedural errors, UNLESS you have an ironclad case you can win, therefore it would not prejudice you in anyway not to been issued the soc/ssoc... Let's hope so...Another barrier while at bva is if you have a poa with any vso..They are the ones who really contribute to the backlog while at the bva. Good thing for you is that you have 2 years already into your docket date to be heard at bva. Last i heard from case management was bva were on 2011 docket dates to be worked. Good Luck..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This concerns me:

"My Veterans Service Officer was trying to get a DRO before it ever left for BVA"

Did you or the DAV respond to the SOC in time to request a DRO review?

Please check me and correct me.... someone here -----

but I think the response time is 60 days for SOC and 30 days for SSOC in which one can request a DRO review.?

I had a case transferred to the BVA quite some time ago, after many years at the VARO and things moved faster at that point....

I made sure the BVA had my evidence (sent them copies of all the good stuff the RO had ignored) and rebutted the C & P exam the BVA had ordered

on a remand. I sent everything directly to the BVA and used their ombudsman from time to time via email to make sure they had all of my stuff.

"Faster" at the BVA is a relative word however.

Claim filed in 2003. BVA award 2008, retro took until 2009....the retro became a battle of it's own due to FTCA issue.

But I knew the BVA could read and it was far easier to await their proper decision ,once they got the case.

I still dont get what the VSO said he/she was 'trying' to do.

Do you have a copy of your signed request (or his/hers) for the DRO review?

.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the VSO submitted form 9. I believe he further requested a review of my appeal. If that is at all possible at this point. I'm assuming before it leaves for BVA. If he has submitted form 9. Will it sit at the VARO Louisville until BVA calls for it? Does it already have a docket number assigned? Below is the info provided at the ebenefits website.

11/30/2011 Local VA Office Decision RO

12/21/2011 Notice of Disagreement (NOD) RO

01/24/2012 Appeal Pending BVA

06/08/2012 Decision & Claims File Dispatch BVA

03/06/2013 Appeal Pending BVA

05/28/2013 Statement of the Case (SOC) RO

06/04/2013 Substantive Appeal (Form 9) RO

07/23/2013 Certification of Appeal RO

Edited by MPsgt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA almost shipped my claim off to the BVA even though I did have a NOD with a DRO request that was in their hands. You have to keep your eye on them and check frequently yourself. You can't depend on some VSO to do this for you. I know that is a shock, but true knowledge to old timers. VSO's have caused me much grief over the years. Piss poor representation to the point of malpractice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA almost shipped my claim off to the BVA even though I did have a NOD with a DRO request that was in their hands. You have to keep your eye on them and check frequently yourself. You can't depend on some VSO to do this for you. I know that is a shock, but true knowledge to old timers. VSO's have caused me much grief over the years. Piss poor representation to the point of malpractice.

John,

I'm in total agreement with what your saying. However, I'm very aware of how hard my VSO is working not only for me but, many Veterans. I spoke with him today and his trying to get my appeal pulled before it leaves for BVA. My VSO has an office very close to VA officials at the VARO. He too said that if it goes to BVA. It will sit for two to three years. I pray that it all goes well. Thanks for the response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VSO will probably prepare ( or has done it already) a strong 646.

This form, discussed here at

is often never mentioned in BVA decisions, but when it is, often the VSO or Vet rep has raised a serious issue of evidence that supports the claim.

A 646 is more or less the VSOs, or representatives last chance to argue the decision and tell the VA why they are wrong.

Most 646s however are generic renditions.... mine was prepared by a vet rep who was not familiar at all with my claim and it sat on his desk for many months,holding up the formal transfer to BVA.

John is right although it does certainly appear that this VSO is working hard on your behalf.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use