Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rate this question


sceballos

Question

Hello all -

The DOD and VA lost my records for 23 years, and with a slew of serious health problems, I've had to put together my own top notch medical team. They were all more than willing to complete the DBQ's (at least for the presumptives) for DS/DS. However yesterday, I had to go through C&P exams for everything. Can anyone give me any insight?

Stefani Ceballos

-Wake up every morning curious. And wake up determined to find the answer."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

C & P exams justify the VA system....what I mean is, if they award compensation they have to have a medical rationale from a VA C & P exam in order to award it.Or if they deny it, then the veteran can appeal and get an IMO ort use their DBQs to help overcome the denial

You stated:

"They were all more than willing to complete the DBQ's (at least for the presumptives) for DS/DS."

What is DS/DS?

What are your presumptive disabilities that you claimed?

Reason I ask, with so many missing records, does your DD214 and whatever other stuff you do have ( such as any SMRs)

reflect eligibility for the presumptives from the Gulf War (I assume you mean here Gulf War presumptives but I sure could be wrong.)

I commend you for your schooling and profession choice. VA nurses are almost always the cream of the crop at the VAMCs and they work very hard.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, VARO's require C&P's in many instances that they do not need to be done. In the communication to the C&P office they provide instructions on questions they want answered and the issues they are looking at. The phrasing of these questions are very important and how the examiner views these questions will determine a lot of what goes on at the C&P physical. I had filed a claim for urinary dysfunction and radiculopathy based on bulging discs in my thoraco-lumbar spine. In the same claim, I was asking for SC and a rating for my cervical spine secondary to the thoraco-lumbar dysfunction due to misalignment. The question to the examiner was did my cervical spine injury cause the urinary dysfunction and radiculopathy. In the exam she stated that it was not caused by my cervical spine, I informed her the claim was submitted as secondary to my thoracic and lumbar spine. She indicated she could not deviate from the guidlines/questions she was to answer from the VARO.

Some VSR's and RVSR at some RO's are setting up C&P exams that are geared toward developing a record for denial not developing for all relevant and actionable information. You generally are not given copies of that communication in your C-file or exam (which is in the EMR).

Be vigilant!

Edited by 71M10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I had filed a claim for urinary dysfunction and radiculopathy based on bulging discs in my thoraco-lumbar spine. In the same claim, I was asking for SC and a rating for my cervical spine secondary to the thoraco-lumbar dysfunction due to misalignment. The question to the examiner was did my cervical spine injury cause the urinary dysfunction and radiculopathy. In the exam she stated that it was not caused by my cervical spine, I informed her the claim was submitted as secondary to my thoracic and lumbar spine. She indicated she could not deviate from the guidlines/questions she was to answer from the VARO."

Geez.....

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use