Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Site To Look Up Attack Info?

Rate this question


kate7772

Question

Is there a good "official", as in one VA will believe, site to confirm attacks on Marines in Vietnam? Or possibly Air Force, as the one I am looking up was officially an AF attack but Marines were assigned to guard.

The one I am specifically looking for took place in Jan 1968 in Da Nang.

Thanks,

Kate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You could write to Joint Services Records Research Center to see if they could verify that. Their contact info is here under a search.

BUT before you do that, you need to give them a lot more details.

The link here might help.

Is this to confirm a stressor you had? Were you in the attacked unit?

Danang suffered multiple attacks throughout the war . As this chart show, when my husband was there (USMC Danang 65-66), the Danang AFB base was attacked 26 times.

Also 2 times in January 1968:

http://366thspsk-9.com/Misc/Attacks.htm

There is extensive info on line regarding the USMC in Vietnam as well as USAF.

This has to be narrowed down to details because there surely was a morning report done on the specific attack.

Your USMC unit surely as a web site and might have some history there.

No one at the VA will search for this stuff....they might ask JSRRC to confirm the attack,for a PTSD claim, but they will need a lot more info to do it and sometimes ,VA says JSRRC could not confirm the incident, but the VA never sends them the request, in the first place.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The Tet Offensive began January 30, 1968. Danang was severely hit as were most provincial capitals all over S. Vietnam. If the marine you are talking about was in Danang during Tet 1968 he must have seen combat. Does he have a Combat Action Ribbon? I think the Marines probably had every infantryman, cook, clerk and truck driver fighting to save the city at that time. I bet everyone service man who could shoot a rifle was on the line somewhere trying to protect Danang from being overrun. Hue City to the north was captured by the N. Vietnamese for a while and the fighting to take it back was house to house.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

Perhaps something here may assist Vietnam War Information

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

PRETTY SAD THEY DONT TAKE HIS WORD FOR IT. Soldiers are going to have to bring thier personal go pro cams into combat if this keeps up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

With the name of the unit involved and the date, you can find almost anything having to do with Vietnam that still survives in paper form. It might take some looking as not all of the daily sitreps are complete, but the wealth of information available here is nothing short of amazing.

http://www.recordsofwar.com/vietnam/usmc/

I only searched the Marine section, but the other services sections are probably just as awesome. Some of the writing is hard to read, so if you find something you need help deciphering--just ask. There are a number of Marines on hadit.

http://www.recordsofwar.com/vietnam/airforce/

http://www.recordsofwar.com/vietnam/navy/

http://www.recordsofwar.com/vietnam/army/

Edited by GuaymasJim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use