Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu Filing Within One Year Of Decision

Rate this question


Snake Eyes

Question

I received a "split decision" on 5/1/14 with an effective date of 8/24/12 for all but one condition and 1/15/13 for the remaining one. On the advice of the MHCS case worker, I applied for TDIU. Since my most recent contract expired on June 27th, I submitted an informal to get the TDIU ball rolling. In a situation like this (requesting TDIU within a year of the original decision), is the effective date still the date of the TDIU submission or is it retroactive. NOTE: I attempted to infer a TDIU in my original claim as explained below.

--------------------------------------

After one C&P exam, I submitted a 21-4138 showing I made no more than $8,700 in the past three years (one of them was $4,800 and the other $7,800). I also broke down the hours worked weekly (about 22 hours) and indicated I worked an additional 20 to 24 hours UNCOMPENSATED trying to come up with ideas for new classes I could teach online.

The MHCS case worker spent over an hour with me and concluded I should apply for SSDI and TDIU based on unemployability. When I mentioned this statement and one I made in the C&P exam that led the examiner to think I was full-time employed, she said it would be clear to anyone reviewing her notes that it would be impossible for me to actually put in that many hours.... it turns out almost all of the "uncompensated work time" was spent THINKING about what I could do, reading textbooks, etc. amidst frequent breaks. We'll see if we have a case. For now, the main question is how the effective date is determined in a situation like what I described above.

Snake Eyes
SFC, USA (Ret)

90% -- Still breathing :-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"I thought I had it bad.... 'till I looked around me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Curious what your other ratings are that got you to 90%. Sounds like you have a decent chance at Iu with your 70% GAD and your Doc stating you should not work. Did she put that wording in your progress notes? If so, did you include that in ur IU claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

No, as long as you are currently unemployable solely due to SC conditions you can apply. I know with SSD you have to wait 6 months but not with TDIU. Get it while the VA is in the giving mood. With all these OIF/OEF vets starting to file the VA will clamp down somehow to make it harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

SSDI claim is already in -- did not have to wait six months -- probably because I was a self-employed independent contractor and have no new contract. Agreed on getting the TDIU claim in while the VA is still in a giving mood. There are three SC conditions that contribute to my inability to work, and I cited all conditions on the SSDI claim. Unfortunately, I also included one that is not SC. With my luck, I would not be surprised if Social Security honed in on that one :-)

Snake Eyes
SFC, USA (Ret)

90% -- Still breathing :-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"I thought I had it bad.... 'till I looked around me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This may seem like a foolish question, but I was wondering if I should wait until a determination is made on the SSDI claim before filing for TDIU. I "established date of claim" for the TDIU claim by phone with Peggy, but it's not showing in eBennies yet.... makes me wonder. :-)

Snake Eyes
SFC, USA (Ret)

90% -- Still breathing :-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"I thought I had it bad.... 'till I looked around me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Curious what your other ratings are that got you to 90%. Sounds like you have a decent chance at Iu with your 70% GAD and your Doc stating you should not work. Did she put that wording in your progress notes? If so, did you include that in ur IU claim?

I just got the progress notes the other day... She did not say, "Veteran should quit his job and go on disability" -- of course, they can't say something that obvious. She basically described my symptoms in clinical terms with a view toward what analysts would be looking for at Social Security or raters at the VA would be looking for in showing how my work would be impacted. I'll review again and I wonder if she should say something more overt.

Also... FWIW, she's an LCSW and not an M.D. For whatever reason, they don't seem eager to get your head in a vice if not necessary. The C&P shrink had a lot of lovely "resume enhancers", if you get my drift. Best thing they did for me is "Rule out PTSD"... the thinking was what I have is in some ways more work prohibitive than PTSD. She said, "A guy with PTSD might be able to work in a warehouse... a guy with your symptoms would avoid the warehouse as well." Gee thanks. :-)

Snake Eyes
SFC, USA (Ret)

90% -- Still breathing :-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

"I thought I had it bad.... 'till I looked around me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use