Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

would an increase migraines from 30 to 50% risk my 100%?

Rate this question


proudveteran

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I asked a similar question to the DAV SO that I trust.  His recommendation was "you're at 100% P&T, don't submit anything to have the VA review what they've already awarded."

If there's a compelling reason, smart guys will add their two cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Chuck that is the reason. I am currently very close to SMC S, but according to va math 30+10+10+10 doesn't equal 60. The additional $400 a month would really help out, and like I said, I currently meet the criteria for 50% migraines which would qualify me for SMC S.

I shouldn't have to worry about the VA taking away what I have, but we all know they cannot be trusted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have another disability that is not secondary to the one you were rated for & it has not improved, I see no reason why they would mess with your current disability...a lot of other contentions can pop up at any given time...look at AO for the Vietnam Veterans  some times it can take years for AO related disability's to show up..

 you served you deserve

if you get increase to 50%migraines request the SMC's   

so if it was me I'd ask for an increase and request the SMC.

 

This is what I am going to do with a PTSD CLAIM.

 

jmo

 

..................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 

a

 

 

Edited by USMC_VET

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Since I got P&T in 2002 I have filed at least 7 claims for other AO conditions  and  a couple of CUE,s.       Since the VA is still years behind on just doing first time claims for much younger and more recent vets I am not too worried about them reducing me just because I file for an increase.  If you have been 100% for five years and are 55 or older I don't think they will mess with you unless you give them good reason.  However, it is always good to be prepared.  If you have good evidence for the 30% to 50% increase I would fly with it.  VSO's always tell you not to risk what you have and this can be good advice, or it can be really bad advice.  If there is money to be gained by filing they I say file.  If you are just adding another 10% to your rating then I would not do it.  I did file for an increase in my DMII rating when I started taking oral meds for it.  I would file for things that could be fatal or make money.  I would file for any cancer that is AO related.    I am waiting for them to make skin cancer presumptive.  I am pretty light skinned and my forearms took a beating from tropical sunlight.  Now I see the damage on my face, ears, and arms where I get some pre-cancerous lesions.

 

When I filed for my CUE to get a much EED the VA did bring up exams I had in the late 1980's that challenged my service connection,  but it was all bluff since I had been SC'ed for 15 years by then.  The VA can get down and dirty and really show that they are jerks who care nothing about vets.  If I have a good claim I will go forward with it.  The best defense is a good offense with these guys.  Look at Berta.  She has raked them over the coals  so often I think they are taking up a collection to send her to China as our secret weapon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use