Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Medical Malpractice

Rate this question


Lemuel

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I HAVE A QUESTION!

What is the required form to file a claim under 38 CFR 3.361 "Benefits under 38 U.S.C. 1151(a) for additional disability or death due to hospital care, medical or surgical treatment, examination, training and rehabilitation services, or compensated work therapy program." required by 3.154?

Edited by Lemuel
Focus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have never used a form for my 1151 claims.

As StatesideLegal says here:

http://statesidelegal.org/about-us

there is no specific 1151 form but some VSOs or vet reps might have a specific template they use.

I  always just wrote my VARO a letter stating it was a claim under auspices of 38 USC Section 1151, and then laid out the evidence, which I enclosed, and I got a proof of mailing receipt.

This is a template of my most recent 1151 claim:

"Department of Veterans Affairs                       September 20,2012

                                                           

Regional Office

130 South Elmwood Avenue

Suite 601

Buffalo, N. Y. 14202 2478                                 XC xx xxx xxx 

 

 

To whom it may concern:

 

            This is a claim filed under auspices of Section 1151, 38 USC.

 

            I request a proper rating and proper retroactive payment regarding my deceased husband's hypertensive disease, malpracticed on during his lifetime by the VA health care system. My husband is Rodney F. Simmons, deceased, date of death-October 14, 1994.

 

            The most recent VA actions regarding his death would be the Nehmer Philadelphia VARO award letter , dated January 17,2012, regarding his AO IHD,in my C file.

 

            Also the CUE claim I had pending at your VARO since 2004 was awarded by the Philadelphia VARO this past January.

 

            I have enclosed as evidence, a VA document from Dr. XXXXXXXX XXXXX, as requested by the Office of General Counsel ,dated July 24,1997 ,which includes  the following statements :

 

“As noted in his history review above ,his BP was NOT adequately treated,and this is extensively documented.”

 

“Yes, better antihypertensive treatment should have been initiated,given the evidence of both old CVA and old MI.”

 

“It is my professional opinion that it is likelier than not that this dose of pseudoephedrine

would raise his poorly controlled  BP, and did contribute to his death.”

 

“and concentric hypertrophy (consistent with inadequately treated hypertension).”

 

            I remind VA that my DIC application, to include accrued, was filed within one year after the veteran's death.

 

            Regarding the EED for this claim, I refer you to the enclosed documents and the veterans' VA  employment physical of June 1988 and the medical records subsequent to and including the heart attack Rod had on August 13, 1988,misdiagnosed by VA as a sinus infection. That specific 1151/FTCA issue (the cardiac event of 1988 etc) has been proven and resolved by the VA. And I refer you to all VA medical records and documents generated after August,1988 as well.

 

                                                      -2-

 

            I have enclosed copies of the VA's 1997 posthumous rating sheet showing the HBP as NSC and the rating given.

 

            I refer VA to 21-1MR Part IV, Subpart B,Chapter 3,Section D ,et al, for further guidance on how these types of Section 1151 claims are to be adjudicated.                                                                                      

                                                                                                 Respectfully, 

                                                                                             Berta M. Simmons

                                                                        Surviving Spouse of Rodney F Simmons

 

                                                                                                  XC XX XXX XXX 

                                                                                              (contact info redacted)

(I gave them my email and phone number, always good to put into 1151 claims)

                                                          

 

Enclosed:

Exhibit A-1 and A-2  OGC June 6th 1997  request to VACO Director Medical Services   2 pages

 

Exhibit B-1 and B-2 Response from Dr. XXXXXX XXXXXX VACO Medical Services July 24,1997 2 pages

 

Exhibit C-1 and C-2  Buffalo VARO rating sheet dated July 9, 1997 2 pages

 

Enclosures total 6 pages."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 They denied it at first, I filled another CUE on them within days, via email to their director and via complaint at the IRIS system, and the award was shortly thereafter, in the mail.(CUE under 38 CFR 4.6)-they ignored my medical evidence from VACO)

 But as you can tell, this all grew out of the successful FTCA case I had.

I was only  able to get the above report and medical question the OGC asked, after the settlement had been paid.

In most 1151 cases, an IMO/IME is needed to strongly confirm malpractice occurred, with a full medical rationale based on all available medical evidence, and a strong statement that the VA did not provide proper and timely  diagnosis or therapy, treatment etc, consistent with that  of the "standard and usual " medical community-meaning non VA doctors, and that those medical errors caused  the veteran's additional disabilty of   -------- . (or caused and/or contributed to  the veteran's death.)This was also my same cause of action on my SF 95.....as failure to diagnose and treat-in spite of overwheming evidence in the veteran's medical records.

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks, Berta.  That will be the route I take in the absence of finding a specific form.  Seems they have one for everything.  I'll use the old 21-4138 as a base so that it is on a form that is often forwarded by the Evidence Center and since 3.154 isn't specific as to which form that should do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use