Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lowering My Disability Rating

Rate this question


J A

Question

I recently received a re-exam for my anxiety disorder that I have a 70% rating for. They sent me a packet explaining they want to lower the rating to 30% because of "improvements made". When i told my treating physician about this, he disagreed that any improvements have been made and agrees to write a statement for me to send in as evidence. I'm just curious how much ground his statement can hold against their examiners and if it is likely that they will reduce my rating or leave it as is. Has anyone else submitted doctors statements and had the VA rule in their favor? Is it common?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Can you scan and attach their decision  and the evidence they used, to reduce you here?

Please cover your C file # and name prior to scanning it.

Is your doctor a VA doctor? It is hard to know why they reduced and also if they will accept the doctor's statement.

We need more info.

The VA tried to reduce my husband ( 30% SC PTSD) to 10% - 1988-long ago. I read over their absolutely ridiculous rationale, and I wrote a NOD for him, citing Their own regulations they used for the reduction and why it was BS. The VA withdrew their proposal to reduce. 

Ironically he went up to 100% P & T SC for PTSD 3 years later. (1991)

(That was a posthumous decision because he died with 2 claims pending- one for higher PTSD rating which I continued after his death)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hate to say it but some ROs are shady as heck, I was sent a proposal to reduce after my neuro was ONE of my providers who sent in paperwork for my aid and attendance, I had over 13 years of history of my migraines being so bad.  History of them being not helped with medications,  the list goes on AND I had held my 50% rating for my migraines for over 10 years.  They still tried to reduce me.  I was IU PT at the time, by the time I was done with them I was 100% PT with my SMCs.  I did not pas go, I did not appeal,  I did not ask for a DRO hearing, because they were breaking their own rules.  I sent and email to every single person within the VA who was as high up as I could think of and also had my mental health exams thrown out (they lasted less than 30 minutes and the woman even wrote in her notes how "wealthy" we were because I received more child support than she did?, um yeah because she is a doctor and I am a disabled veteran pretty sure her ex makes far less than my ex who is a warrant officer with 30 years of service.  None of that is necessary in my psych c and p except to check the box whether I can handle my own finances or not.  I also had added conditions that I had never claimed before after I saw that they were going to send me for CP exams for every single thing I was rated for, including the scar and my TMJ which had nothing to do with my aid and attendance.  One of which is now rated at 60% but the examiner said I had "waited to long to claim it", the lovely woman who answered my email and then called me after sending only evidence from my neuro, the filled out forms, the proposal to reduce as well as my in treatment service records for the claimed condtion they were denying me for let me know I would hear from my RO within a week.  I not only had my 50% restored immediately but also the other condition and my SMCs.  Don't let them push you around and don't be afraid to go around their stupid system.  I would be homeless and without being able to pay someone to care for me when my husband and son cannot because well, if we wait for them to include the rest of us in the caregiver program we mine as well pound sand.  There last best guess was this fall, you know computer problems, well............everyone in IT must be home because of Covid so it should be fixed.  Yet, here we are and I am not convinced they will delay and deny Vietnam era veterans and earlier yet again.  Waiting for more to die so they don't have to pay their caregivers.  No one is out protesting and demanding justice for them or us though.  Shameful.  In the meantime, we pay almost half of my VA comp and pension for someone to either care for me or our children because I cannot be left alone with them and I'll be damned if I ever open another claim.  Odd how someone can apply for caregiver benefits and their claims aren't touched but we apply for a measly 400+ dollars more a month and our world can come crashing down on us and we can lose our famiily's healthy care, our propety tax exemption, our chilren's college money (chapter 35) I had 3 children in college at the time and yet they have zero risk.  Seems like a pretty messed up system in my eyes but hey what in the hell do I know.  I am just a disabled veteran who had no idea that I could even use the VA for over a decade, lived in hell for so many years and survived despite what the Navy and no one else bothered to tell me.  No one gave me a TAPS class, I find most VSOs dont' know a dang thing and you are your best advocate.  Don't let the VA push you around, yes if you get close to that 30 day mark most definitely file those papers but I strongly advise you if you have hit those protected years of holding a rating, don't let them screw with you, start writing emails.  Very precise with evidence and well written. 

 

Best of luck!!
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Be careful with your physician because you need to recheck your medical notes  in MYHEALTHEVET

About the only way they can know about any medical improvements you have are what your MH Dr & Your Therapist or social worker  puts in their notes.

They are copied into them after 3 days  and your R.O. MAY HAVE GOT THESE NOTES.

so you need to check these notes 3 days after your appointment with these Docs.

IF YOUR Dr writes that your condition anxiety has not improved  then they may cancel the proposal to reduce.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
On 7/23/2020 at 10:08 AM, Buck52 said:

Be careful with your physician because you need to recheck your medical notes  in MYHEALTHEVET

About the only way they can know about any medical improvements you have are what your MH Dr & Your Therapist or social worker  puts in their notes.

They are copied into them after 3 days  and your R.O. MAY HAVE GOT THESE NOTES.

so you need to check these notes 3 days after your appointment with these Docs.

IF YOUR Dr writes that your condition anxiety has not improved  then they may cancel the proposal to reduce.

The RO WOULD have gotten these notes because it is a legal requirement that we query the database for VHA for clinical notes for a claim action and add those notes to the veteran's file. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Ok, this sounds like a "proposed reduction" not a decision.  

If this is the case, dont "file a nod", but instead, dispute the proposed reduction, and cite evidence that you have not "actually improved under ordinary conditions of life."

Read the reduction rules, and mention that you dont meet the criteria for reduction, cite evidence and why.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

You can request a hearing on the matter if you so desire.  (I dont do hearings because I dont hear well!)

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with broncovet 100%. Be sure to dispute the proposed reduction and submit ASAP. In addition to what Bronc said, you could build up your position by obtaining more evidence of your current condition, which includes current supporting "buddy letters" from your family/friends. If you can get a favorable  (to you) statement that your condition has not improved from your doc based on recent or a new session, do it.  You can beat this proposed reduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use