Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Superior Canal Dehiscence

Rate this question


Kuwaitin08

Question

Situation- I have been suffering from serious ringing in my ears for roughly the last decade or so along with very sensitive hearing. Among those symptoms, I have a slew of other issues that are currently unimportant to this post but some of my other issues were vertigo and occasional memory loss. After countless trips to the doctors, audiologists and ENT's I was finally diagnosed with tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Claims for disability were filed and after a few battles, I was awarded 10% with hyperacusis and tinnitus combined but I was denied for the vertigo and memory loss.

After a few more years of testing for balance issues and dizziness, Cat Scans and MRI's I now have a diagnoses of superior canal dehiscence. It is a pretty rare condition that is a royal pain in the butt to diagnose but here I am. 

Does anyone know how this is rated? I've read some articles that says it rates similar to Meniere's Disease and Tullio's Syndrome and yet read others that say it rates as simple hearing loss. Luckily I am able to show the onset of symptoms started during my last deployment with medical records so I don't believe it should be an issue to service connect it.

I'm currently in the process of putting together a fully developed claim to submit. I'll be adding all paperwork from all previous submissions for tinnitus, vertigo, hyperacusis and more to hopefully get it squared away. Lord willing it will be a large check coming from a few years of back payments.

Any assistance you could provide would be appreciated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Kuwaitin08 Sounds like you have a pretty knarley disability there brother. My guess is they would rate it analigus (spelling?) to Meniere's disease if it had most of the same symptoms ex. dizziness, balance, headaches, etc. But, you can be rated on one disability or several components, but not both ways. Look up CFR 4.87 schedule of ratings diseases of the ear. You need a specialist, not a self diagnosis, that you have a certain disability. Your new diagnosis is hard to come by; make sure you have a strong IMO from your hearing specialist that get your s-c tied in. The VA just won't give out disabilities on less frequently submitted disabilities. A second supporting IMO from another doc is something I would certainly consider for an investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, GBArmy said:

Kuwaitin08 Sounds like you have a pretty knarley disability there brother. My guess is they would rate it analigus (spelling?) to Meniere's disease if it had most of the same symptoms ex. dizziness, balance, headaches, etc. But, you can be rated on one disability or several components, but not both ways. Look up CFR 4.87 schedule of ratings diseases of the ear. You need a specialist, not a self diagnosis, that you have a certain disability. Your new diagnosis is hard to come by; make sure you have a strong IMO from your hearing specialist that get your s-c tied in. The VA just won't give out disabilities on less frequently submitted disabilities. A second supporting IMO from another doc is something I would certainly consider for an investment.

My diagnosis for superior canal dehiscence was from the VA. Luckily for me, they are also the ones who diagnosed me with tinnitus, balance disorder, Memory loss and hyperacusis. 
 

It is my guess that they will have to admit they misdiagnosed the other stuff as they are all symptoms of my new diagnosis and all Started at the same time. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Of course, I am not qualified to say "your" condition is closer to Meniere's or hearing loss.  

However, you need to review what your audiologists and doc's say.  Given the Vertigo, I would guess Meniere's.  

You just have to fight them.  Have you appealed within a year?  Is it too late?  Are you familiar with the rating criteria for audiology problems?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, broncovet said:

Of course, I am not qualified to say "your" condition is closer to Meniere's or hearing loss.  

However, you need to review what your audiologists and doc's say.  Given the Vertigo, I would guess Meniere's.  

You just have to fight them.  Have you appealed within a year?  Is it too late?  Are you familiar with the rating criteria for audiology problems?  

I’m familiar with audiology ratings and am SC for everything except vertigo. 
 

With the VA’s new diagnoses of my condition, I imagine it’s gonna be a hot mess trying to have the disability folks square it away. Superior Canal Dehiscence wasn’t even discovered until 1998. 
 

I don’t foresee any real battle with getting SC for SCD due to the VA giving the diagnoses and the timeline, I just like to get a general idea on how they rate things. This looks like a hot mess.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

This is a rare diseases   it will have be repaired with surgery, It is unknown why this happens  and normally hereditary

so it maybe hard to prove service connection  unless a Dr will give his medical opinion it is  caused by ot related to your hearing loss

for a secondary condition...if this is ratable  It maybe a High rating  I would think  until you get it surgically repaired.

I read a little about this , it is rare and usually a person can hear sounds a normal person can't...also its normal for people that have this can hear there eyes close  or hear your eyeball move  and hear the inside of the body sounds  ect,,ect,,  I guess with the canal being seperated  it reverses the hearing into your body?

This one is going to be hard to figure out a rating  and he maybe Temporary.  it maybe like a temporary rating when veterans  that have TKR 

(Total Knee Replacement ) if they have a service connection for it   they can get a 100% temp rating until the knees are ok  normally for 1 year after the Surgery

So Sorry you have to go through this.

Good Luck on finding out the rating criteria   ..I can only imagine most of us will  try to find it  to help you better.

Hang In There

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use