Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What are VA disability reduction methods?

Rate this question


Jake206th

Question

HLR for EED was returned for duty to assist error based on; 38 CFR §4.70 Inadequate examinations.

The Higher level review return says that the c&p examiner did not specifically address the board remand directives even though the c&p examiner did specifically and explicitly address all of the noted board remand instruction directives.

 

They are questioning all of the basis that the original C&P examiner gave that the VA used to grant the increased evaluation of 100%, even though it was clearly sufficient.

They are questioning the diagnosis, the frequency, the symptom severity level, and the duration.

 

What are their options to reduce in this scenario?

Difference of opinion? Cue? Reduction process?

Can they bypass all of those option and just re adjudicate it at a lower rating because the decision was less than 1 year ago?

 

Does this mean that the favorable findings laws and cue laws don't apply and that they can just issue a new rating decision to revise my 100% rating without any CUE or reduction due process?

 

 

I am not a lawyer and nothing I write is legal advice. It is just how things appear to me based on my limited understanding. and I may be incorrect.

Edited by Jake206th

I am not a lawyer, and nothing I write is legal advice, it is just how things appear to me based on my limited comprehension and understanding and therefore may not be accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Mr cue,

I'm not sure you "apply" for SMCs, you apply for increases that might result in getting SMCs.

I could be wrong on that.

 

If the veteran suspects the VA is "stacking" C&P exams for the sole purpose of reducing benefits, then there are courses of action the vet can take. 1. Contact the Patient Representatives Office and file a complaint-should be the first choice.

 

Call, or log onto the VA's website, and file a complaint with the AG's office.

Inform your rep-American Legion, VFW.., etc

 

Need copies of your C&P exam(s)? Now it's easier than before. Visit your LOCAL VA office 10+ days AFTER your C&P exam and they will give you copies; you can also file Freedom Of Information form available from va.gov.

Used to be before you had to call that dreaded 1-800 number-VA, but not anymore!

Don't let the VA make you the veteran do all the work, stay informed and make the VA do their job!

Allan 2-2-0 HOOAH!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
15 minutes ago, allansc2005 said:

Need copies of your C&P exam(s)? Now it's easier than before. Visit your LOCAL VA office 10+ days AFTER your C&P exam and they will give you copies; you can also file Freedom Of Information form available from va.gov

Someone tell me if they get a copy from the regional office.

I never seen it.

19 minutes ago, allansc2005 said:

If the veteran suspects the VA is "stacking" C&P exams for the sole purpose of reducing benefits, then there are courses of action the vet can take. 1. Contact the Patient Representatives Office and file a complaint-should be the first choice.

 

Well I really don't think that will change anything because they are contractors comp exams.

Nit VA hospital use to work back in the good old days lol

As far as smc benefits if you apply day for a@a there is a Comp exam for just that.

There is no reason for the VA to open all your disabilities unless you ask for a increase rating.

The law is the VA is to inferred smc benefits with each increase rating claim.

But most of us understand how that go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@Mr cue, the only thing that "wont change anything" is if you do nothing.

The VA isn't going to give you anything, so I have provided solutions to the issue at hand.

Truth of the matter is, if you sit around all day eating Doritos and swigging down Cobra beer*YUK* hoping the VA is going to do something without you putting forth effort, you might as well wish in one hand and drop a load in the other, NOT happening.

In my 25+ years of fighting the VA mediocracy, I have learned that the resources are there to fight and win your case, but the VA isn't going to deliver those resources to your door wrapped in roses.

If you don't know something, ask someone(like here), ask questions, get a representative.., do something!

 

"The mind is a terrible thing to waste"    -Walter Coppage

 

Allan 2-2-0 HOOAH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 1/12/2023 at 1:03 PM, allansc2005 said:

It's always been my understanding that a reduction can happen ONLY after certain conditions exist

If a Veteran files an appeal it opens the record for the VA to easily order a new medical exam > Also the Board or HLR can declare a duty to assist error which creates "new and relevent evidence" for the VA to "reconsider" your rating and order a new c&p exam > the New medical exams often contain contradicting medical opinions > which creates “competing facts”, which then have to be resolved > because competing facts could indicate a “material change”, or “improvement” of a Veterans existing disability level > which might trigger a reexamination to resolve the conflict of medical information that an exam order created > which could lead to a reduction procedure, subject to the predetermination hearing rights process.

On 1/12/2023 at 1:03 PM, allansc2005 said:

but unless they are presently "on the books", then the laws and rules stand as they are.

 Laws and rules and their application are subject to legal interpretation and legal precedence, and the CAVC routinely gives precedential rulings that corrects how the Board is misapplying the statutes and regulations. Plus there are laws that are vague that the CAVC sometimes clarifies with precedential ruling which would also change how the laws and rules were being applied by the board and ro.  Additionally the Federal register changes rules occasionally. So yes rule and law changes can and do occur. Even congress changes the statutes and laws occasionally, for example the AMA.

I seem to recall that there is a thread on this forum where Berta submitted a rule change suggestion to the Federal Register during a proposed rule change session that they acknowledged or adopted, but I could be wrong.

 

On 1/12/2023 at 1:03 PM, allansc2005 said:

5. Then you have the age and timeline factors; 10-20-30, 55+..and so forth...

I think you are referring to: 38 CFR 3.327 Reexaminations here. And under (b) (2) of that regulation, note the words "future" and "periodic". It appears to me that "future" and "periodic" reexaminations in compensation and service connection cases are the types of reexaminations they are referring to there.

It says pretty clearly that it shall not be construed as limiting the VA's authority to request reexaminations at any time. And I am not aware of any law that says that they can not order them, but if you know of one do tell.

 

38 CFR 3.327 Reexaminations

(a)General

Reexaminations, including periods of hospital observation, will be requested whenever VA determines there is a need to verify either the continued existence or the current severity of a disability. Generally, reexaminations will be required if it is likely that a disability has improved, or if evidence indicates there has been a material change in a disability or that the current rating may be incorrect. Individuals for whom reexaminations have been authorized and scheduled are required to report for such reexaminations. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section provide general guidelines for requesting reexaminations, but shall not be construed as limiting VA's authority to request reexaminations, or periods of hospital observation, at any time in order to ensure that a disability is accurately rated.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-38/chapter-I/part-3/subpart-A/subject-group-ECFR39056aee4e9ff13/section-3.327

 

 

I am not a lawyer and nothing I write is legal advice. It is just how things appear to me based on my limited understanding. and I may be incorrect.

 

Edited by Jake206th

I am not a lawyer, and nothing I write is legal advice, it is just how things appear to me based on my limited comprehension and understanding and therefore may not be accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Believe it or not, the VA does from time-to-time use the "common sense" approach to things, claims..

 

In my 25+ years of dealing with, fighting with.., the VA, I've found the VA C&P system generally doesn't request claim reductions without a reason.

The main thing here is to keep yourself educated about the claims process, and it looks like you are doing your homework.

 

There isn't enough room here for me to make a "cheat sheet" of all the things a veteran can do to stay ahead of the game, rat race.., associated with claims, but I do know this: If you even think the VA is doing everything they can to ensure you get maximum benefits, then you are sadly mistaken.

 

Just another day in paradise!

 

Allan 2-2-0 HOOAH!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

VA has so many new claims to deal with I don't think they go on witch hunts to reduce 100% vets.  I think it is much easier to win claims now than back in the 70's and 80's.  Getting an increase in those days or maintaining a rating was harder IMO.  Since I was P&T I must have filed 6-7 claims for new conditions and increases.  No problem with VA wanting to reduce me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use