Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I am about to file a claim for Headaches. Below is the information I will supply in the claim. Do you think it will suffice?

Rate this question


Wico1337

Question

Hello all, below is what I plan on filing with my VA claim. Do you think it will suffice? I was sure to point out I have a current diagnosis by the VA. A convincing nexus along with how the condition has already been acknowledged as being secondary to my current rated condition. Backed by citation of another veterans review. And finally, criteria of my condition and how it falls in line with the 50% rating for headaches.

Beginning of claim

"Headache Claim

 
 
With a recent suggestion of my VA Primary Care physician to include daily intake of Zyrtec and Flonase to ease my Allergic Rhinitis symptoms, my headaches have began to occur less frequently and less severe since taking the Medications suggested by the VA. This has made it apparent that my Allergic Rhinitis has caused my Headaches for many years. The ENT specialist at the VA diagnosed me with Allergic Rhinitis and prescribed me medication so I do not need to continue buying Zyrtec and Flonase.
 
The VA has already ruled that there is a direct nexus between Allergic Rhinitis and Headaches.
 
According to VA Citation Nr: 1048433
 
 
Quote “Service connection for migraine headaches as secondary to allergic rhinitis is granted.”
 
All headaches, including Migraine Headaches, fall under the same category of ratings which is 38 CFR 8100. 
 
I have a diagnosis of Chronic Headaches from the VA Primary Care physician on file.
 
The following VA Finding means that while I am describing my symptoms, I will refer to my symptoms for my condition as unmedicated, as medication is not mentioned in the rating schedule for Headaches.
 
In Jones v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 56, 63 (2012), the Court held that the veteran is entitled to a rating based upon his unmedicated condition – that is, the higher disability evaluation – if the effects of medication are not explicitly mentioned under the applicable diagnostic code of the rating schedule.
 
My condition for Headaches occur very frequently, forcing me to assume the prostrating position which is where I need to lay down in a dark area and rest my body and mind. This can last anywhere from hours to days. This has caused severe economic inadaptability. Causing me to cancel meetings with people, miss hours or a day of work, miss spending time with wife, miss participating in my things in life. All because of the extreme head pain and overall extreme body exhaustion that my headaches cause."

End of claim.

With all of the information above. How should I present my symptoms to the examiner? The examiner will be asking how frequently headaches occur. Should I follow the guidelines of pre-medication? Or when they ask me questions about how often I get headaches, should I answer them how I feel currently with medication? If I answer with how I feel while medicated, I have a feeling that the Rater will see the symptoms as a 30% rating. And I would have to appeal for a 50% rating as I should have been rated for 50%. What would be the best way to approach? And do you have any feedback on my claim statement above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes, it can be sc secondary, "If" (and only if) your doctor opines that your (diagnosis of headaches) is at least as likely as not due to PTSD/anxiety/depression, etc. (SC conditions).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you Bronco. I am not trying to be negative at all. But looks like he it trying to claim a secondary to something that he isn't service connected for. He is trying to get a Nexus or an IMO for something that hasn't been approved. He does an SC mental disorder. I would think that I would try to connect a secondary condition for something that's already serviced connected. Just me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 7/14/2022 at 8:27 PM, Whodat said:

Thank you Bronco. I am not trying to be negative at all. But looks like he it trying to claim a secondary to something that he isn't service connected for. He is trying to get a Nexus or an IMO for something that hasn't been approved. He does an SC mental disorder. I would think that I would try to connect a secondary condition for something that's already serviced connected. Just me. 

Bingo, he should take the path of least resistance and connect it to a condition already rated. I also highly suggest getting an IMO, unless he has a good working relationship with his VA provider. In my experience, and to my surprise even against VHA policy, I've had a primary care physician for whom I've been seeing for years refuse assistance. The focus should be on getting it documented properly and not who can opine the quickest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
Quote

I am not trying to be negative at all.

Don't look at our posts as being negative, these are simply the facts and try not to take them personally. We are here to try to help and not discourage. Post may sound insensitive, but they are not meant to be. It is better to be clear and to the point than tell a veteran that the VA should have granted his/her claim when we have already seen and experienced the reality of the VA taking the short cut of denying claims and secondary claims when in fact the claim should have been filed differently. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use