Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

IMO was very Comprehensive but OSA Supplemental Still Denied

Rate this topic


GulfWarVet1990

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon, I just received the denial letter from VA for OSA supplemental claim (added new evidence).  Even with a very comprehensive IMO from Dr. Anaise, OSA diagnosis and CPAP prescription VA denied.  I am SC for Chronic Sinusitis (10%), Tinnutis (10%), Allergic Rhinitis (0%), and PTSD (50%), the IMO included these conditions linking to OSA.  No go, the VA still noted the VES Examiners write up was more persuasive.  Also as usual, they state no evidence of OSA while in service. 

The supplemental denial letter also indicated a DBQ review on June 3, 2022 which did not require my attendance.  Just disappointing how the VA keep taking the cheap route hiring the lowest bid contractor (my perception anyway).  I question the validity of the VES examiners credentials, the examiner who reviewed my file and completed the DBQ for the supplemental claim had no credentials for the specialty.  

As stated, Dr. Anaise wrote an excellent IMO and several on this forum have hired his services, so I have confidence in his work.  The denial letter was a disappointment however, I do not plan to give up.  I was denied twice for cancer and wanted to give up but my VSO convinced me to pursue and I eventually I was granted sc with retro.  

Has anyone ever experience a supplemental claim for OSA and after appealing to BVA won your case. BVA is the route we are taking, I just cringe at the delay and amount a days before my case may be considered.  Positive words of encouragement and advice are welcome. Thank you. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could file a complaint with your local VARO and contest the VES examiners credentials and exam.  This probably will trigger another C&P with a different examiner.  I've done this in the past.  It worked out for me.  I guess you have nothing to lose by filing an HLR, but they'll probably rubber stamp the VES examiner.  But you never know.

I believe Dr. Anaise is also a lawyer.  You may want to contact him again to see if he can represent you.  I imagine he might take interest since his exam is being dismissed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again. All of this hooblah about nexus letter, now vets are financially struggling as is, paying all of their money to get a nexus just to get shot down. 

I just received a pm from a member stating that legacy appeals are extended for another 3 years. I have not found anything on that but if it is true, then think about how long AMA claims will take. 

Nexus or not, VA is doing to take advantage of people that have sacrificed their lives for their country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GulfWarVet1990 said:

Good afternoon, I just received the denial letter from VA for OSA supplemental claim (added new evidence).  Even with a very comprehensive IMO from Dr. Anaise, OSA diagnosis and CPAP prescription VA denied.  I am SC for Chronic Sinusitis (10%), Tinnutis (10%), Allergic Rhinitis (0%), and PTSD (50%), the IMO included these conditions linking to OSA.  No go, the VA still noted the VES Examiners write up was more persuasive.  Also as usual, they state no evidence of OSA while in service. 

The supplemental denial letter also indicated a DBQ review on June 3, 2022 which did not require my attendance.  Just disappointing how the VA keep taking the cheap route hiring the lowest bid contractor (my perception anyway).  I question the validity of the VES examiners credentials, the examiner who reviewed my file and completed the DBQ for the supplemental claim had no credentials for the specialty.  

As stated, Dr. Anaise wrote an excellent IMO and several on this forum have hired his services, so I have confidence in his work.  The denial letter was a disappointment however, I do not plan to give up.  I was denied twice for cancer and wanted to give up but my VSO convinced me to pursue and I eventually I was granted sc with retro.  

Has anyone ever experience a supplemental claim for OSA and after appealing to BVA won your case. BVA is the route we are taking, I just cringe at the delay and amount a days before my case may be considered.  Positive words of encouragement and advice are welcome. Thank you. 

 

 

 

Just curious, did the imo state in detail that he reviewed your Cfile, and all SMR?

Edited by Stayfocus
Miss spelled
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GulfWarVet1990 said:

Good afternoon, I just received the denial letter from VA for OSA supplemental claim (added new evidence).  Even with a very comprehensive IMO from Dr. Anaise, OSA diagnosis and CPAP prescription VA denied.  I am SC for Chronic Sinusitis (10%), Tinnutis (10%), Allergic Rhinitis (0%), and PTSD (50%), the IMO included these conditions linking to OSA.  No go, the VA still noted the VES Examiners write up was more persuasive.  Also as usual, they state no evidence of OSA while in service. 

The supplemental denial letter also indicated a DBQ review on June 3, 2022 which did not require my attendance.  Just disappointing how the VA keep taking the cheap route hiring the lowest bid contractor (my perception anyway).  I question the validity of the VES examiners credentials, the examiner who reviewed my file and completed the DBQ for the supplemental claim had no credentials for the specialty.  

As stated, Dr. Anaise wrote an excellent IMO and several on this forum have hired his services, so I have confidence in his work.  The denial letter was a disappointment however, I do not plan to give up.  I was denied twice for cancer and wanted to give up but my VSO convinced me to pursue and I eventually I was granted sc with retro.  

Has anyone ever experience a supplemental claim for OSA and after appealing to BVA won your case. BVA is the route we are taking, I just cringe at the delay and amount a days before my case may be considered.  Positive words of encouragement and advice are welcome. Thank you. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use