Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Copy Of My Nod Any Advice?

Rate this question


majrrich

Question

This is a copy of the NOD that I prepared. Denied IU

Please accept this Statement as my Notice of Disagreement (NOD) with your decision which denied my claim for increased compensation due to Unemployability dated Jul 8, 2008

I am requesting a DRO review of your denial.

i disagree with your decision for the following reason:

You stated in your lasrt paragraph"Our letter to you dated Jan 9,2008 requested that you complete and return VA Form 21-8940, Veterans Application for Increased Compensation based on Unemployability) to date, we have not received it. Therefore, we have denied your claim as the information requested was crucial to our decision."

The first time I sensdt Form VA 21-8940 was on July 9, 2007 it was received at the VARO on Jukly 11,2007. I have enclosed a copy of the return receipt from the USPS signed by -----Dated Hyly 11,2007

The second time I sent VA Form 21-8940 was after I received your letter dated Jan 9, 2008. I have enclosed a copy of the return receipt from the USPS signed by-----dated Jan 31,2008.

I do realize that at times items get lost. So I will re-submit my evidence to support my claim which was never considered including a NEW VA Form 21-8940.

Since it appears the reason for denial was the absence of the VA Form 21-8940. I hope that once you have the required information you will reach a favorable decision for my request for Increased Compensation due to Unemployability.

I have enclosed the following New and Material Evidence for your consideration

1. VA Form 21-8940 with statements attached

2. VA Form 21-4192

3. letter from ------ my former customer

4.Declaration from Wife

5. Letter from ------ L.C.C.W.,B.C.D. and Dr. -----M.D.

6 Copy of return receipt dated July 7, 2007

7Copy of reurn receipt dated Jan 31, 2008

What do you think?? does it sound OK

Thanks

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Rich,

I don't have any expertise behind me, but your NOD looks quite similar to mine. The deference is two-fold.

1. I asked for a "de novo" review from the DRO which means that you want all evidence from the beginning to be reviewed and any new evidence to also to be taken into consideration.

2. I asked for a "face-to-face" meeting with the DRO. This will not be the same RO that made the orginal decisio,

Thank goodness for "return receipt reqested". Others will add more or correct any errors I have made, but all-in-all the NOD looks good. Good luck and remember "de novo review.

Fog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think it is good. All you need to do is run a spell check on it. I would ask for a De Novo review, also. I don't think a face to face is necessary, though, since the only reason you were denied was that they did not have the IU form.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree this is good and I dont think you would need a hearing-that would hold it all up even more-

is there any way that you ypurself could get a statement from your employer?

Most vets dont want to ask for this type of statement- and most employers think the vet might try to sue them under the ADA but still-

in some cases -maybe an employer would be willing to state to VA that your SC disabilities affected you negatively in job performance.

then again maybe best to make sure they get the VA form-fill it out and return it to VA.

Under FOIA I got a statement that was dynamite as to my husband's PTSD on the job.

They released it in error.

Years later the woman who signed this statement told me she didnt even know who Rod was and could not recall the incident.

Rod didnt remember it at all but said he must have gone off for them to make this statement to the DOL.The employer said his temper oputburst had created a hostile environment.

Funny thing the EEOC awarded him discrimination claim and wages under the ADA laws.

I think the EEOC knew the whole statement was a lie.

Still one never knows when an employer might be willing to help with a VA claim.Hopefully they will return the info to the VA promptly.

Cripes-their errors (VA) and you have to wait again- what a system.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you did a great job. Short, sweet, and to the point.

The same thing happened to me. I had to send in my Form 9 twice before they acknowledged receiving it, but since I'd sent it registered/w return receipt and had the receipts they had signed they had to accept it as timely. Yours will be too.

I agree w/Fog - Thank goodness for return-receipt!

Good luck! Hope you'll let us know when you get your TDIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would still try for the personal hearing. My reason being that you get to talk to a living human being. God knows what condition your file is in, and what the VA is doing with your claim or will do with it? Many of these so-called DRO Reviews are just cut and past jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta

I was self employed independent contractor. installing signs. I had only one client Century 21. He wrote a letter stating the reasons he no longer needed my services. i.e. unreliable, argumentive, did not install signs correctly bascially said I was no longer able to work etc.

I stopped working in 2005. I filled out the 21-4192 myself

It was never full time work approx 18hrs a week made approx $400 to $800 a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use