Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Service Connection Due To

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Yikes-this issue came up here today but when I left the BVA web site I couldnt remember what post!

Service connection can be obtained due to inservice aggravation of pre-existing condition as well as aggravation after service of a NSC condition-due to an established SC condition.

Example of inservice aggravation-

http://www.va.gov/vetapp08/files1/0808223.txt

The veteran acknowledges that his perforated right ear drum disability began in childhood prior to service. Based on the service medical records and the veteran's statements, the Board finds clear and unmistakable evidence that the perforated right ear drum disability existed prior to service. The appellant, however, argues that his disability was aggravated by his military service. The service medical records note that the disability existed prior to service and that during service the veteran's right ear was treated for an infection caused by water exposure. While the appellant's perforated right ear drum disability predated service, the veteran may be awarded service connection based on in-service aggravation. In order to establish service connection the veteran must provide evidence of a current disability, an in-service aggravation, and a nexus between the current disability and an in-service aggravation. A preexisting injury or disease will be considered to have been aggravated by service where there is an increase in disability during service. Aggravation may not be conceded where the disability underwent no increase in severity during service on the basis of all the evidence of record pertaining to manifestations of the disability prior to, during, and subsequent to service. 38 C.F.R. § 3.306. The veteran submitted a December 2004 letter from Dr. Yanagisawa who opined that it was likely that the veteran's right ear condition was aggravated and worsened while in the military. In August 2007, a VA examiner opined that exposure to water in the military aggravated the pre existing right tympanic membrane perforation. The medical evidence is far from conclusive with respect to the issue on appeal. However, VA has not failed to meet the burden of showing no in-service aggravation of the preservice disability. Indeed, the evidence is at least in a state of equipoise relative to the question of aggravation of the perforated right ear drum disability. Thus, service connection for perforated right ear drum disability is warranted. ORDER Entitlement to service connection for a perforated right ear drum disability is granted. This vet below claimed aggravation rather than secondary-http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files3/0726519.txt

CONCLUSION OF LAW Service connection for chronic renal insufficiency based on aggravation from the service connected diabetes mellitus is warranted. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.310 (2006).

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Larry, I have no idea whether he was accepted or not. I couldn't get past the recruiter even asking the question! Did it really matter what "kind" of felony? Why wasn't the guy immediately shown the door...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Service Connection on Aggravation and Secondary Bases

A 21st Century System for Evaluating Veterans for Disability Benefits (2007) Board on Military and Veterans Health (BMVH)

Page 272-286

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11885&page=272

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The position any good advocate would advance is "HOW DO YOU KNOW THE EAR PLUGS DID NOT FAIL AND AGGRAVATE THE CONDITION".

I have seen this argument used to win industrial injury claims.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jbasser-

but in your example, they wouldn't have any of those conditions prior to entering the military or else they wouldn't be allowed in. lung/heart disease and sleep apnea are all no-go's for entering the military.

I agree with you, because I am a perfect example!

I went in the service with 3 pins in my left hip, and they (AFEES) questioned if I should enter.

I want to enlisted and train for Medical. Strangely enough, the enlisted me as an Infantryman!

I was fine until Bivouac. I apparently suffered a compression Fx, whereas a pin penetrated the joint space.

I was medically discharged.

Theoretically, I shouldn't have gone in. However, being that we just pulled out of Nam, enlistment numbers were way down.

We are seeing the same "History repeating itself" scenario today...reducing the enlistment standards to meet recruitment numbers.

Edited by hollywoodnc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use