Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vision Loss Due To Diabetes

Rate this question


trailblazer

Question

I filed a claim for vision loss due to complications of DMII and high BP. This is part of what the evaluation says,quote A 70% evaluation is awarded for field concentric contraction in both eyes, end of quote. I was under the impression that a rating for vision loss was not to be combined with any other rating but stood on its own. I am almost sure I read that somewhere in 38cfr part 4 but I can't find it. I am going to need it if in fact exist to file an appeal. They combined the 70% with the 40% I already had and turned it into 80%(VA math sucks) Someone tell me if I am right or wrong in my thinking. I don't want tie up the va with an anppeal I can't win. To many other vets out there need help. Any help will be appreciated. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Your 70 percent rating is standing on its on. The statement that it stands on its on means that they must provide a seperate and distinct rating for it and cannot say it is part of the DMII rating. In such an example lets say the max for the loss of sight is 50 percent (example only). They cannot simply give you a new 50 percent rating and take away the 40 you already have for DMII. Hope this makes sense.

Now as to what they have done - it is correct. All seperate ratings are combined to obtain your overall rating - it is the law. They took your 40 percent rating and added your 70 percent rating. 40 + 70 = 82 (in va math 40 +(70x60=42)= 82 percent which gives you an over all 80 percent rating. If they had not given you a stand alone rating for the eyesight then your rating would have been 70 percent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks clown man, that was the answer I was looking for. That makes me elgiable to apply for tdiu. I will be filing for that in the coming weeks. All I need is a statement from my former supervision and a statement from my personel Dr. and they said they would do that. Thanks again and I'll keep you posted on how this works out. I think the world for you people on hadit you are all so willing to help another vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate your thoughts about other vets but believe me-you deserve whatever comp you can get!

Why didn't the VA award you TDIU?

Vision loss can be basis for SMC award when the initial SC is 100%

"70% evaluation is awarded for field concentric contraction in both eyes, end of quote."

Did they give legal citation or any other statement regarding that?

DMII can cause atherosclerotic heart disease, brain atrophy, oral candidiasis, hyperlipedemia, and countless other conditions such as PN, caratacts, skin and foot problems.Most are ratable.

Can you tell us here the exact medical terms in the vision problem diagnosis if it is more detailed than field concentric contraction?

Is this in both of your eyes?

How did they break down the ratings you have? or is Clown Man right on that -which I think he is-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to find in the rating guide for vision loss ratings on a chart that had visual acuity info. The chart had your vision listed on the left and top.

Trace each eye rating to the middle of the chart and it showed the appropirate rating. So I was 20/200 in one eye and 20/20 in the other, matched them up = disablity rating. Also included info if rating is elegible for smc.

I will see if I can find it. I am cruising towards a 70% rating on vision loss, so it's hard to find things, sometimes.

I'll post the link. Also FYI, 40% DMI, combined with 30% vision loss and 10% depressive disorder = 60% Math sounds right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

How do medical people determine that cataracts are caused by DMII and not by other causes. I have DMII and have developed catarats. I am only 59 and that seems kind of young for cataracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100 x 70% = 70 100-70 =30

30 x 40% = 12 30-12 =18

The body is counted as a 100 % whole. Every time a new rating is giving the take the largest number and and start and subtract it from 100%. The next largest rating is multiplied by the number that you had left.

Edited by sharon

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use