Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can I Cue This?

Rate this question


Shark

Question

I was awarded 50% for PTSD (was already 50% for AO stuff) total 80% and applied for TDIU and was denied. I just received a copy of my C file and noticed that my 50% on PTSD was set for a follow up on 7/2010 which is the date my Psychiatrist put on a form for California disability which asked for the earliest possible return to work date. So, the VARO had that form when they granted my 50% on PTSD, shouldn't they have also taken that same info to grant me TDIU until at least 07/2010? Is this something that I can CUE?

Vietnam 66, 67/68. Combat Aircrewman doing search and rescue in N Vietnam. HS-6

Combat Vets Association

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

"may be a stupid question but can a Cue be filed for a case at the BVA ?"

Yes once the BVA makes a decision and it becomes final.

i thinks every vet shoulds appeall eveyrthing. what a backloggs that woulds be. tonail probelms appeal it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"may be a stupid question but can a Cue be filed for a case at the BVA ?"

Yes once the BVA makes a decision and it becomes final.

Maybe I should have asked the right question. What would be the outcome of filling the Cue if the BVA agrees that errors were made in the case and remands it back to the state VARO for a hearing? Sorry for the wrong question put out there been a long hard week. Thanks someting positive is always nice thing to wake up to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a claim is denied by the BVA it can be appealed to the CAVC.

However there is no way to get more medical evidence into the court record at that point.

If the CAVC finds BVA made legal errors in their decision, CAVC could remand the claim and this could open up way for more evidence to be provided.

However any BVA decision -if final -can be cued by the form of a Motion to the BVA claiming CUE had occurred.

There is extensive info here at hadit on CUEs- a BVA decision can only be cued by a Motion ,with legal evidence of the legal error.

The BVA CUE criteria is a little different from CUE claims filed against a RO decision.

I posted lots of info here on all that available under search at hadit.

I recently helped a lawyer assess his client's claim at the CAVC.

We both came up with only 2 legal errors that he could raise to the court in his brief- but that is all it takes- legal errors BVA made to get a remand.

The only problem is this vet in my opinion would never be able to prove his nexus-the reason for the BVA denial-

On remand maybe he can come up with proof of his nexus.

I had a Motion under CUE at the BVA which ultimately was resolved by the regional counsel here in NY- it was an odd situation-

I didnt appeal beyond the BVA denial-

But I did get awarded the CUE and mega retro when I re opened my AO death claim and the Regional counsel had to verify what I said in it-that VA killed my husband in 1994.

Even though the RO had all this documentation they checked with the VA lawyer anyhow and he ordered the RO to award the CUE.

Funny thing I got a 5 figure check in the mail from VA and it took me 4 -5 days to find out what it was for.Then I found they erred in the amount- I wrote to them and within 3 weeks I got another check.

Over 40 thousand bucks. Not bad for a CUE.

I believe many CUE claims can succeed.

Many vets dont even know the VA committed CUEs in their past decisions.

I intend to succeed on the two pending CUEs I have now at the RO level.

If the legal evidence thoroughly fits into criteria for CUE- the vet has a winner.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a claim is denied by the BVA it can be appealed to the CAVC.

However there is no way to get more medical evidence into the court record at that point.

If the CAVC finds BVA made legal errors in their decision, CAVC could remand the claim and this could open up way for more evidence to be provided.

However any BVA decision -if final -can be cued by the form of a Motion to the BVA claiming CUE had occurred.

There is extensive info here at hadit on CUEs- a BVA decision can only be cued by a Motion ,with legal evidence of the legal error.

The BVA CUE criteria is a little different from CUE claims filed against a RO decision.

I posted lots of info here on all that available under search at hadit.

I recently helped a lawyer assess his client's claim at the CAVC.

We both came up with only 2 legal errors that he could raise to the court in his brief- but that is all it takes- legal errors BVA made to get a remand.

The only problem is this vet in my opinion would never be able to prove his nexus-the reason for the BVA denial-

On remand maybe he can come up with proof of his nexus.

I had a Motion under CUE at the BVA which ultimately was resolved by the regional counsel here in NY- it was an odd situation-

I didnt appeal beyond the BVA denial-

But I did get awarded the CUE and mega retro when I re opened my AO death claim and the Regional counsel had to verify what I said in it-that VA killed my husband in 1994.

Even though the RO had all this documentation they checked with the VA lawyer anyhow and he ordered the RO to award the CUE.

Funny thing I got a 5 figure check in the mail from VA and it took me 4 -5 days to find out what it was for.Then I found they erred in the amount- I wrote to them and within 3 weeks I got another check.

Over 40 thousand bucks. Not bad for a CUE.

I believe many CUE claims can succeed.

Many vets dont even know the VA committed CUEs in their past decisions.

I intend to succeed on the two pending CUEs I have now at the RO level.

If the legal evidence thoroughly fits into criteria for CUE- the vet has a winner.

Thanks What I have on my case is that the VA examinier overrode a VA Nuerosurgeon on the issues of my knees and voided his opinion out based on some facts that were just plain wrong. It was said in my claim that I was retired for from my civillian Job for injuries I did not recieve. I was retired because of migraines and PTSD (non Service related) Everytime I look at the case file I get pissed funnything everytime I go to the VA I get the same guy I have tired to switch exams but nothing happened. I get that take it or leave rule so I go ahead with the exam and get the shaft. I am not going to give up but thanks for the infromation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I applied for a nervous condition back in the early 70's for an incident that occured while I was in the military. I was denied on the basis that "nervous condition" is not a disease or injury. I have since been awarded 50% for PTSD for the same incident. Is PTSD and nervous conditions the same thing and could I possibly win a CUE Claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think you need a DX besides nervous condition. Perhaps there is something in your SMR's that shows a DX. About gettting a CUE retro back to the 1970's I would look into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use