Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Amazing The Things You Find When You Go Through C-file!

Rate this question


Shark

Question

The basics, I am 50% SC for PTSD, 20% SC for DM2, and 10% SC for PN for each limb for a total of 80% SC. I filed for TDIU last July and was denied and filed a NOD in October.

I just found in my C-file the results of a VA ordered medical exam done in March of 2005 which included an addendum which states:

"The veteran reported high blood pressure problems for the past two years and has been on antihypertensive medication. The diagnosis is HYPERTENSION, at least as likely as not related to diabetes."

The VA never rated me hypertension as a result of this exam. In this exam I was 164/84 and will run in the 140's/80's today and am on multiple antihypertensive meds. Is this a CUE? Should I say anything now and disrupt the process of my current appeal? I am guessing at best I will only get 10% on this which will not raise my overall %.

Any thoughts? Should I just ask for a rating for hypertension second to DM2 and hope they re-examine my more current evidence in support of TDIU?

I also found in my SMR visits to the doc for heart burn on multiple occassions (currently have GERD) and multiple visits for back pain (currently take pain meds for back pain) should I file for these too?

Thanks to all for all of your previous help!

Vietnam 66, 67/68. Combat Aircrewman doing search and rescue in N Vietnam. HS-6

Combat Vets Association

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
The basics, I am 50% SC for PTSD, 20% SC for DM2, and 10% SC for PN for each limb for a total of 80% SC. I filed for TDIU last July and was denied and filed a NOD in October.

I just found in my C-file the results of a VA ordered medical exam done in March of 2005 which included an addendum which states:

"The veteran reported high blood pressure problems for the past two years and has been on antihypertensive medication. The diagnosis is HYPERTENSION, at least as likely as not related to diabetes."

The VA never rated me hypertension as a result of this exam. In this exam I was 164/84 and will run in the 140's/80's today and am on multiple antihypertensive meds. Is this a CUE? No Should I say anything now and disrupt the process of my current appeal? According to what you want to say I am guessing at best I will only get 10% on this which will not raise my overall %.

Any thoughts? Occasionally Should I just ask for a rating for hypertension second to DM2 and hope they re-examine my more current evidence in support of TDIU? Assuming that you filed an NOD with more evidence that will win your TDIU claim, I'd let sleeping dogs lie until I got my TDIU, but, then that's me, see, and not you, you do as you see fit.

I also found in my SMR visits to the doc for heart burn on multiple occassions (currently have GERD) and multiple visits for back pain (currently take pain meds for back pain) should I file for these too? You need to, eventually, file for all that you have coming to you.

Thanks to all for all of your previous help!

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, as Larry says, you want to win the TDIU claim, and then you can go back and get SC'ed for HPB. I think you should do that later. Get it for the Gerd as well since Gerd can cause cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Shark...

Based on what you said in the post, using a risk/benefit analysis, there is no need to file for hypertension...as you said there is nothing to gain as 10% wont add anything, and more to loose...time.

I like doing thinks that are low risk and high benefits, the scenario you mentioned is low risk but no potential benefit. I would say you are better off playing the lottery, it is low risk (you are risking a dollar) but high benefit potential..(hitting the big one) Ever wonder why millions play the lottery even tho most people understand it is a "voluntary tax", that is, about 50cents of your lottery dollar goes to some "worthwhile" government program, and the other 50cents is paid back to the lottery players in the form of "winnings"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Shark...

Based on what you said in the post, using a risk/benefit analysis, there is no need to file for hypertension...as you said there is nothing to gain as 10% wont add anything, and more to loose...time.

I like doing thinks that are low risk and high benefits, the scenario you mentioned is low risk but no potential benefit. I would say you are better off playing the lottery, it is low risk (you are risking a dollar) but high benefit potential..(hitting the big one) Ever wonder why millions play the lottery even tho most people understand it is a "voluntary tax", that is, about 50cents of your lottery dollar goes to some "worthwhile" government program, and the other 50cents is paid back to the lottery players in the form of "winnings"?

I believe you should file a claim to service connect the hypertension as secondary to your service connected diabetes for 2 reasons: (1) You might be eligible for service connected disabled life insurance and (2) If hypertension were to cause or contribute to your death then your survivors would possibly receive Death and Indemnity Compensation if a claim for DIC was filed by your eligible survivors and you had been service connected for this condition as secondary to your service connected diabetes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your htn should be an inferred issue.

File the claim. You are losing money by not.

There is a host of secondaries that can be related to HTN. Soem forms of heart disease that canot be caused by DMII suck as Arrythmias and ect.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use