Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange Presumptions Why The Delay?

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Agent Orange presumptions why the delay???

Posted on July 28, 2009 by stimeling

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) announced Friday,July 24th, there is a possible connection between exposure to Agent Orange and both Parkinson's Disease and Ischemic Heart Disease. In a similar report issued in 2006, the IOM determined a connection between Agent Orange exposure and Hypertension. The VA has yet to acknowledge this link and make Hypertension a presumptive illness.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) announced Friday there is a possible connection between exposure to Agent Orange and both Parkinson's Disease and Ischemic Heart Disease. In a similar report issued in 2006, the IOM determined a similar connection between Agent Orange exposure and Hypertension. The VA has yet to acknowledge this link and make Hypertension a presumptive illness.As a presumptive illness, all the veteran who suffers from the condition needs to do is establish he served in Vietnam between 1962 and 1975. There are other areas where Agent Orange was used where the presumptive illness rules apply Korea near the DMZ is one.Since the IOM has established at least an increase in occurrence of these conditions in veterans who served in Vietnam, why then is there no presumption of service connection for veterans afflicted with these conditions?Quite simply the answer is MONEY! The Secretary of the VA cannot afford to grant presumptive status for these conditions. It would destroy his budget. The large increase in health care services within the VA budget would be wiped out immediately! This is the problem. While we all agree that our veterans deserve the best of health care from the VA, Congress has not and apparently will not consider fully funding the VA. Their failure to do so creates a system that is dependent upon a budget that has been below needs almost every year for at least a decade. Last year's budget was $3 billion short.A document prepared in June of 2005 by the Democratic staff of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee a snapshot of what shortfalls in the budget do to care for our veterans.

  • Fifty percent of all the veterans receiving home health care through the San Antonio VAMC will now have to fend for themselves. This cost-cutting measure means that some 250 veterans, including those with spinal cord injuries, will no longer be provided this care.
    • Veterans in need of outpatient psychiatric treatment at the Portland facility are on a waiting list because of the budget shortfall.

    [*]As a result of cost cutting measures to make up for the shortfall in FY 2005, the Portland, Oregon, VAMC is delaying all non-emergent surgery by at least six months. For example, veterans in need of knee replacement surgery won't be treated because of the budget shortfall. Cut like this would be commonplace if the presumptions for Parkinson's, Ischemic Heart Disease and hypertension were granted. The solution is to fully fund the VA Health Care system. Let the administrators of all VA facilities know that they are to provide the veterans with Quality health care at all times. This is in direct conflict with the current policies of delaying or refusing to treat veterans because of budget constraints.

    Congress does not appear to want to provide full funding. When given the option of full funding and advanced appropriations they chose advanced appropriations. Advanced appropriations will not fix the VA budget! Only full funding will. We as veterans must unite in an effort to convince the Congress and the President that the VA must be fully funded.

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/article8124.html

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

My shrink at the VA says he refuses to sign off on giving psychotherapy. He says that 15 minutes every 3 months is not psychotherapy, and he is right. If you have problems you will never get real improvement depending on the VA. They are just pill pushers. Not every problem can be solved by taking a drug. My shrink tells me jokes because we both know that what we are doing is BS. I get pills and then see him 3 months later. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re" the 'delay' part of this post-

this is all a LONNNNNNGGGGG way from becoming AO presumptive ( Heart disease, Parkinsons and HBP)- read Larry Scott's comment's as well as those of some vets and my comment too under the story on IOM report at VA Watchdog.com.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It is about money. That is all it is about. If VA makes heart disease presumptive for AO it will cost the VA millions and millions of bucks in compensation and DIC. They don't want that and will do anything to delay that outcome. I hope I am wrong, but I think they learned from the DMII AO presumption. That will cost them major bucks. The public wants us vets to be taken care of, but congress has other uses for tax dollars. Our enemies are sitting in D.C. helping themselves to taxpayer's money. That is all politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

So if they can come up with bailout money for millionairs why not come up with money for sick Veterans.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use