Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Diabetes Claim Advice

Rate this question


sburrows

Question

I am looking at filing a disability claim for diabetes secondary to my service-connected asthma, lower back, achilles tendon rupture, hypertension, and migraine headaches. Because of my service-connected injuries and illnesses, it makes it extremely difficult to exercise properly and limits the types of exercises that can be done. This has caused a dramatic increase of my weight from 190 lbs to 250 lbs, even reaching 276 lbs.

Does anyone have any advice or strategy on how to proceed with a claim such as this? I can't seem to find another issue like this. Thanks

Scott B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

If a medical doctor could give a full medical rationale for that type of claim-ruling out all other possible etiologies for the diabetes,except for service connected disabilities- it could possibly be awarded as secondary.

This will be difficult. I studied diabetes medical info and studies quite a bit for my claim and nothing like any of the disabilities you mentioned caused it.AO did. I assume you are not an incountry Vietnam Vet?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct ... not a Vietnam Vet. I was told by my DAV representative that if my pulmologist, orthopidic, and internal medicine doctors each write an opinion stating "more likely than not" statement, he could argue effectively.

Also, can you direct me to articles or studies about diabetes and inactivity and obesity? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There should be some good info at the American Diabetes Association Web site.

I used the ADA site,Diabetologica abstracts for my claim,also Merck, Johns Hopkins, the VA's own Diabetes training letter, and medical abstracts from all sorts of studies.

My IMO doc used two medical texts that are difficult for vets or widows to access and they are costly.I researched my claim continually for the 6 years the award took.

The word Diabetes never once appeared in any of my husband's med recs. Just a note that said DVD with a left arrow and cf diag (after a fingerstick test was ordered but the VA failed to do).The doctor had just told my husband he thought his major CVA was from diabetes and noted the fingerstick test was to be done. It never was.

I tracked this VA doctor down across the country and he gave me a brief 2 sentence IMO. The BVA gave considerable weight to his statement and to my 2 IMOs.and to my competent lay evidence.

I dont have any specific links to obesity causing diabetes but this is a well know medical fact-

I think you are using the fact that you are sedentary from SCs

causing the diabetes.This makes sense.

NOTHING is impossible with the VA-

but the DAV is right-

I saw a widow's case where the vet died of heart disease with hearing loss as only service connection.

She proved the Hearing loss caused him to be sedentary and that he could not exercise or do much at all.I think vertigo was also part of his HL problems.

She was awarded DIC due to HL contributing to his death from heart attack.

The DAV is right but if they mean independent opinions- do you have private doctors?

Sometimes treating private docs will do an IMO for free.

I paid 4 thousand for my IMOs and had just sent 1750 for another one when I succeeded on my claim.They can be very costly.

And often the only way to succeed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is going to be a very difficult claim to win. Even as secondary I don't see it.

There are fat people who have DMII and fat people who don't. How do you explain that? That is what the VA will ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use