Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Won! I Won! After A Four Year And Five Day Battle!

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

On November 2, 2009, I won the first ever VA claim for Agent Orange exposure, "inside the Continental United States." The claim was granted for Chloracne, Diabetes and Heart Disease with ICD implant, as due to Agent Orange exposure at Fort Gordon GA., in the years 1967-1969. You will be able to read the Board Of Veterans Appeals detailed decision along with the supporting evidence at WWW.va.gov in a couple of months when it is posted. From the web site choose Board of Veterans Appeals, then click on Decisions. Next type in the search box Docket No.08-11 937.

Due to the AICD implant, Class 3 CHF and a LVEF of 25% there should be a 100% P&T award.

Other than a $15.00 Medicare copay, here and there, no money was spent on an IMO, so take heart, you don't have to be rich to win!

James M. Cripps,

Vietnam Veterans OF America Tennessee Agent Orange Committee Chairman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Absolutely-

if ischemic heart disease caused or contributed to the veteran's death and the veteran can prove exposure to AO ( RVN vets dont have to prove that)

If any widow or widower (we had many female Vietnam veterans too) is granted AO death award- NEHMER kicks in-they become a Nehmer class action member.

Nehmer -as class action case -provides the earliest effective date for AO awards and -in most cases but not all-

the initial date when the claim was filed-whether the widow ,widower or veteran even raised AO as the cause of their disability-

Personal example -you know I am fighting for a refund of a FTCA offset-

also I have requested the proper EED for my DIC-Oct 1994.

Either way the VA goes they still have to pay an amount that was offset to my DIC because the Nehmer decision says I get it.

So- say they dont pay the FTCA offset-

I filed my direct SC death claim in early 1995,The EED is Oct. 1994.

Under the Nehmer court Order they owe me retro to 1994 anyhow -because my husband died due to AO causing -contributing.I dont know if I raised the AO issue for DIC (I forget)but used his settlement award from the original AO lawsuit to support my claim for SC death.

Whether FTCA refund or AO EED due to Nehmer the VA owes me what should be the same amount either way they award.

I wrote to Will Gunn General Counsel VA-DC yesterday to see if he will educate the Buffalo VARO on the provisions of Nehmer and my claim.Or he can order them to refund the offset.

I dont have any denial to NOD because the VA also refused to acknowledge my BVA award under Agent Orange, which involves the same thing.

So I have basis for frontal and flank attack!!! Yippee-

The VARO has refused to use the word "herbicides" or Agent Orange or Nehmer at all in what they have sent me.

They do this at VAROs because they hope the claimant will not google Nehmer or go to the BVA web site (decisions)and possibly find out the VA is deliberately withholding their proper retro-in defiance of established VA case law and regs under Nehmer in M21-1. Keep us in the dark and we allow them to keep our money.

I am repeating something I have said here many times because it is important.

VAROS all across the US have deliberately misapplied Nehmer to thousands of claims.

When NVLSP (who won Nehmer) found out -they went into the ROs and got these vets and widows their money.

Full story of this unconscionable travesty is in the VBM.

VA continues to do it- and they will even do it more now with the 3 new presumptives-

When any vet or widow/widower re-opens a VA claim under any new AO presumptive I just hope they find a vet rep-who knows what the Nehmer decision involves as it could-with AO award-kick in a very favorable EED-

which is not VA's money- it belongs to the claimant by law.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Congratulations James, a thank you for setting a new precedent for other veterans!!! ~Wings

P.S. Could someone please post a link to the aforementioned "Shinseki new presumptive ruling"? I haven't heard anything about it! Thanks!

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

Would a death certificate have to say ishemic heart disease to get the AO award? You know death certificates often are just a couple of words. I guess this is another reason for RVN vets to tell spouses to get a autopsy done on them. You know many people have a hard time talking about this stuff to a spouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=1796

Three new AO presumptives: ischemic heart disease, Parkinson's disease, hairy cell leukemia-B cell neoplasm

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Berta

Would a death certificate have to say ishemic heart disease to get the AO award? You know death certificates often are just a couple of words. I guess this is another reason for RVN vets to tell spouses to get a autopsy done on them. You know many people have a hard time talking about this stuff to a spouse"

Probably if not specified that way on the death certificate, the survivor would have to prove with the clinical record that the vet in fact had ischemic heart disease.

My husband had ischemia of brain and heart at death.

Ischemia of brain was on Death cert but the heart disease had a different medical statement on the death cert-

Still his ECHO revealed heart ischemia as well as his autopsy and clinical records.

I would have won my AO claim anyhow- due to this new reg -if I didnt succeed in the DMII CAD claim.

Not all CAD and CHF is due to ischemia.

I feel an autopsy is needed in most cases of DIC these days.It gives a far more detailed account of the actual cause of death.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use