Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu Retro Rules

Rate this question


blackbird

Question

Can anyone tell me if the effective date of a TDIU award is ever backdated before the actual claim date? Also, under what situations retro would be granted?

Thanks for your comments!

Blackbird

Blackbird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA will go back up to one year from the date you file for IU. Otherwise, you have to have some special circumstances. You can get a much earlier ED if you can show a CUE or if your claim was previously unadjudicated. This is not often the case. If the VA knew you were unemployable ten years ago they are supposed to treat this knowledge as a inferred claim for IU, but they never do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Search CAVC for "TDIU inferred". http://search.uscourts.cavc.gov/

EXAMPLE

1. In Roberson, supra, the Federal Circuit held that once a

veteran submits evidence of a medical disability and makes

a claim for the highest rating possible, also submitting

evidence of unemployability, VA must consider TDIU. 251 F.3d at

1384. See Roberson (2001) http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/federal/judic...ns/00-7009.html

2. Significantly, in Ingram v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 232

(2007), the Court, in applying the holding in Deshotel, held

that a reasonably raised claim remains pending until there is

either a recognition of the substance of the claim in a RO

decision from which a claimant could deduce that a claim was

adjudicated or an explicit adjudication of a subsequent claim

for the same disability. While the Court applied such

holding to an RO decision, it would be equally applicable to

a Board decision, as it is a decision by VA.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some good examples for an inferred claim for IU:

SSD award

terminated or leave job due to service connected conditions

Doctors note stating that you're unemployable

Example scenareo: Let's say you apply for IU and are granted back to the date of app. If any of these above occurred earlier than the IU application date (less than one year prior) you have good grounds for an earlier effective date award.

The VA will go back up to one year from the date you file for IU. Otherwise, you have to have some special circumstances. You can get a much earlier ED if you can show a CUE or if your claim was previously unadjudicated. This is not often the case. If the VA knew you were unemployable ten years ago they are supposed to treat this knowledge as a inferred claim for IU, but they never do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Say again? Example scenario please? Confused me reading this. Course , it could be just me -

Cg'up!

Some good examples for an inferred claim for IU:

SSD award

terminated or leave job due to service connected conditions

Doctors note stating that you're unemployable

Example scenareo: Let's say you apply for IU and are granted back to the date of app. If any of these above occurred earlier than the IU application date (less than one year prior) you have good grounds for an earlier effective date award.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how else to word it cowgirl.

Maybe someone else can chime in and make this easier to comprehend. Sorry it's confusing.

Say again? Example scenario please? Confused me reading this. Course , it could be just me -

Cg'up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read it again and I think I know what's confusing here. I should have said "appeal" instead of "award" at the end...

Example scenareo: Let's say you apply for IU and are granted back to the date of app. If any of these above occurred earlier than the IU application date (less than one year prior) you have good grounds for an appeal for an earlier effective date

Say again? Example scenario please? Confused me reading this. Course , it could be just me -

Cg'up!

Edited by jerrbilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use