Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The Va Goofed?

Rate this question


AimHigh1986

Question

I filed a reopen claim in Jul 09 for heart disease/heart bypass secondary to my SC hypertension. The VA rec'd the claim 4 Aug 09. In Sep/Oct/Nov 09, I was scheduled for several C&P exams (stress test, EKG, ECG, x-rays, etc) with QTC. Concurrently with my heart disease exams, the VA decided to reevaluate my migraines, so they scheduled me for a C&P exam with QTC specifically for migraines. On 14 Dec 09 I rec'd a call from QTC saying they were finished with my heart disease C&Ps and was going to transmit their findings to the VA that day. On 15 Dec 09, the VA sent me a decision letter on my migraines, stating that there would be no change to my 30% rating. Somehow, the VA thought that the migraine decision letter finalized my heart disease claim as well. I spoke to numerous counselors and they swore up and down that the 15 Dec 09 migraine decision letter covered my heart disease claim as well. I finally convinced one counselor to listen to me and actually READ the decision letter to see what I was talking about. This counselor told me that he would initiate an inquiry to my local VA center. 2 weeks passed but I still hadn't heard from the VA. Not even an obligatory "we are still working your claim" letter. I called the 800 number again today and the counselor told me that the system still showed that my heart disease claim was completed on 15 Dec. Another inquiry was initiated. This time, I was provided a case number. Again, I wait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping that my inquiry will put things back on the radar.

Aim,

Yes indeed, I would be sure this issue remains on the table

and has not been adjudicated as deemed denied.

Does your 15 Dec 09 Rating Decision address any other issues

in the Reasons and Bases Section, other than your Migraines ?

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 15 Dec decision letter only covered my migraines. No other issues were addressed.

The letter stated:

REASONS FOR DECISION

Evaluation of migraine headaches currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling.

The evaluation of migraine headaches is continued as 30 percent disabling. {38 CFR 3.321(a); 38 CFR 3.321(:D(1)}

Period. That's all. They go on to describe my C&P exam on 20 Nov and how my migraine diagnosis has not changed. Nowhere in the letter is there any reference to my heart disease, heart bypass surgery or hypertension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I agree with Berta. It just can't be coincidence that "errors" keep popping up over and over and over, and they are almost never in the Veterans favor. If they were just "errors" there should be an equal number of errors in the Veterans favor, and that is simply not the case. Overwhelmingly, the "cards" are stacked against the Veteran.

I also agree with Carlie in that it would appear that your claim was never adjudicated and still pending. Because the law is still quite fuzzy, and in constant change, I recommend filing a NOD on an issue never adjudicated on the basis it was "deemed denied".

Reason:

It is the safest way for you. Surely, you dont want to miss out on any retro that is owed to you. If you dont file a NOD within a year, then the court could rule your issue "deemed denied" with an expired appeal period. You could potentially loose out on tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of retro dollars.

However, if the courts ultimately decide that "deemed denials" are illegal (which they should be), then your NOD would be meaningless. All you would have lost is the time and postage invested in filing a NOD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesnt pay to depend on an IRIS inquiry to get things right.

They never even answered my last Iris at all.

If the IRIS does verify your heart claim is still open-then that is good hard copy evidence that it is,in fact, still open-

however-"I spoke to numerous counselors and they swore up and down that the 15 Dec 09 migraine decision letter covered my heart disease claim as well." That seems absurd.

I feel you might need to contact DAV again or any vet org who has office in or near your VARO building to see what is what with the heart claim.

Did you get a VCAA letter on the heart claim?

Carlie asked a good question:

"Does your 15 Dec 09 Rating Decision address any other issues

in the Reasons and Bases Section, other than your Migraines ?

jmho,

carlie "

"On 14 Dec 09 I rec'd a call from QTC saying they were finished with my heart disease C&Ps and was going to transmit their findings to the VA that day. On 15 Dec 09, the VA sent me a decision letter on my migraines, stating that there would be no change to my 30% rating. Somehow, the VA thought that the migra etc"

It is obvious that when the RO made the migraine decision they didn't have or consider the results of the heart claims C & Ps.

This heart issue could well be pending for a decision now based on the C & P but I am concerned that many told you the migraine decision covered the heart disease.

The IRIS might take 5 days or more for reply- one of mine took about 2 weeks.

If the migraine decision truly covered the heart disease claim -as Carlie pointed out- there would be statements to this affect in the decision and I bet they didnt say a word about it.

Have you requested a Copy of the C & P results on the heart disease?

The VA would not order a C & P if they had already denied the heart claim which they should not do without having a valid C & P done first.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use