Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Smc Overload

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I have been reading posts, asking questions, reading USC codes and Title 38 and I am more confused now than I ever was.

For SMC. If I have a rating that is 60%, Service connected right knee with chronic resiudals following TKR. Can that rating be established as could or would be able to grant me TDIU??

If it was established that that single service connected condition at 60% could grant me IU, then would I be able to combine my other ratings to meet the 60% criteria for SMC S???

I have seen a lot of posts that state the rating for IU must be 70% to be considered total for the purpose of SMC S, is that true?

Are Bi-lateral conditions considered when computing the rating % necessary to qualify for IU and then SMC S?

I have the following ratings

60% Right knee, failed knee replacement x2 (and just recently diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain syndrome in that knee as well. Can that 60% be increased due to CRPS)

10% Left knee

30% Adjustment disorder

30% sleep apnea

30% cervical

20% lumbar

10% For bothe right & left lower limbs, radiculopathy

10% left shoulder radiculopathy

10% Bi-lateral Plantar Fasciitis

10% Left hand arthritis

10% Tinnitus

10% Hypertension

and a bunch of service connected 0%

My inital rating provided me TDIU and a 90% schedular. I filed a NOD and was granted the 60% for the right knee vice the 30% the rater initially awarded. Added the hypertension and left shoulder since then as well. Currently have a NOD for

seronegative RA, increase for left knee following a menisectomy & prescribed full length leg brace. Active claim for automobile allowance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is the 10% left knee secondary to or a bilateral percent solely due to the SC right knee?

"Currently have a NOD for

seronegative RA, increase for left knee following a menisectomy & prescribed full length leg brace"

and "10% Bi-lateral Plantar Fasciitis" which sure must be aggravating the other stuff.

Have you compared the medical evidence that they used for the 60% to the Schedule of Ratings?

Have that specific disability gotten worse since they awarded?

Have you claimed it (the 60% disability) has been aggravated by the left leg disability -which sure has gotten worse- and warrants a higher rating that way?

"I filed a NOD and was granted the 60% for the right knee vice the 30% the rater initially awarded"

Did you formally appeal the 60%?

"I have seen a lot of posts that state the rating for IU must be 70% to be considered total for the purpose of SMC S, is that true?"

Can you refer me to one of those posts?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forgot to ask:

"My inital rating provided me TDIU and a 90% schedular."

How did VA consider and deny SMC at that time? what was the date of that decision?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry-I should have focused on your first question first-

60% Right knee, failed knee replacement x2 (and just recently diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain syndrome in that knee as well. Can that 60% be increased due to CRPS)

Yes.

The BVA would not have remanded this claim if CRPS was not a ratable disability:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1034802.txt

Did the diagnoser of the CRPS document in your med recs that the CRPS was a direct result of the SC knee?

Can you tell me the diagnostic codes they used for each of your ratings pertaining to both knees?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If, you receive TDIU for one service connected disability rated at 60% or more, and have additional disabilities rated at 60% or more, separate and distinct from the disability that afforded you the TDIU, AND involves different anatomical segments or bodily system(s), then you would be eligible for SMC s. You would have to have medical evidence that you can not obtain, or maintain employment due to your knee condition, and apply for TDIU for it. I would venture to say that the VA would then schedule a C&P. I did not have to have a C&P for my TDIU, as my medical evidence, provided by VA Physicians, my employment record, and my statement was sufficient to establish TDIU.

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the Fast letter says a single condition that was the reason for IU, OR could be considered for IU. My right knee condition is the main reason I was medically retired, and I was approved for SSDI, while on active duty, and the date SSDI found I could no longer work was January of 2007, prior to the left knee being injured, and the daignosis of the multiple orthopedic conditions, inflammatroy arthritis, sleep apnea, hypertension, and adjustment disorder. So I would have to think the right knee at 60% which is the maximum rating even with amputation was, or is able to be a single disability rated at 60% that would keep me from seeking gainful employment.

The Fast Letter does not specifically state that a condition that would qualify the Veteran for SMC S has to have been determined to cause the Veteran IU, or that IU has been awarded for that single SC condition. That is why I am confused. If the qualification now states that the condition "could be" the sole reason for IU, then the VA can grant SMC S.

The CRPS was just diagnosed, and it was consistent with the right knee surgeries and treatment causing the CRPS. The doctor didn't comment on CRPS in any other joint than the right knee. But I don't know if the VA can rate 60% due to chronic residuals of knee replacement, 5055, and rate the right knee with CRPS, or Neuralgia. If 60% is the maximum rating for a leg, can they rate another condition that is present??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use