Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hypertension

Rate this question


huskerfanfl

Question

I retied from the army about two years ago and of course made a claim for disability. One of my claims was for hypertension. When I received the decision it was listed as not compensable because there was not a history shown in my record. The hypertension medicine was prescribed as a result of a visit to the emergency room where my pressure was measured at 166/122. The meds keep it down but barely (normally 132/86). I have appealed and sent in the copy of the emergency room record (again). I would hate to think I need to come off my meds to show that my blood pressure is high.Anyone have any suggestions?

Tim

Vet and proud of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This is the starting point.( http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-...fr4_main_02.tpl ) remove the "()" and cut and paste this into your browser. In a perfect world this should be a 10 (realistic) or 20(lots of documentation) percent. In my case this is the cause of a secondary condition. Submit the documentation for a Comp & Pension examination. Be prepared to wait for up to a year or more for the exam. On my initial claim, I submitted 26 years worth of medical records and the appropriate VA forms. It sat for one year until I filed a congressional complaint. That got the ball rolling. I have been doing this for four years with valid medical records. Treat this like a war and every submission is another campagin to achieve victory. This process is not for the faint hearted, the VA wants you to become discouraged and give up. V/R, Mike

Diseases of the Arteries and Veins

7101 Hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and isolated

systolic hypertension):

Diastolic pressure predominantly 130 or more................ 60

Diastolic pressure predominantly 120 or more................ 40

Diastolic pressure predominantly 110 or more, or; systolic 20

pressure predominantly 200 or more.........................

Diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, or; systolic 10

pressure predominantly 160 or more, or; minimum evaluation

for an individual with a history of diastolic pressure

predominantly 100 or more who requires continuous

medication for control.....................................

Note (1): Hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension must be

confirmed by readings taken two or more times on at least three

different days. For purposes of this section, the term

hypertension means that the diastolic blood pressure is

predominantly 90mm. or greater, and isolated systolic

hypertension means that the systolic blood pressure is

predominantly 160mm. or greater with a diastolic blood pressure

of less than 90mm.

Note (2): Evaluate hypertension due to aortic insufficiency or

hyperthyroidism, which is usually the isolated systolic type,

as part of the condition causing it rather than by a separate

evaluation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply. With the fancy VA math even a 10% rating will get me to 60% disability. I also have issues with low compensation awrds in other areas. The link you posted will definitely help in my endeavor.

Tim

Vet and proud of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jstacy

We call that Low Balling the awards which is a Common practice by the VARO's.

Regarding the Hypertension, These people are going to Jerk you around. It will always yo yo because Blood pressure goes up and down and the VARO also aduusts compensation down. I guess they cant see to adjust it higher. We have to file a claim.

Has it been a year since the decision? You may want to send in a Notice of Disagreement if it is within a year of the decision. Then Appeal stating the rating was not properly awarded due to the criteria met in the 38 cfr chapter 4 rating code 7101.

Another thing you can do is to get all your med recs and make a spreadsheet of the dates and BP readings and submit them to the VA. If there is a consistant elevation then you should have no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Unfortunately you waited longer than one year after you separated. Your best bet is to get a Doctor to write up a Medical Opinion which shows hypertension now, and the Doc's opinion that it was caused by your service or started when you were in service.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My original compensation letter came November of 2004. I did file an appeal within the one year time frame. Included in the appeal were the emergency room records from the visit which resulted in me being put on blood pressure medicine. I also appealed the 10% decision on my back (I have an MRI from active duty that shows 3 bad disks). I know that it may not have been advisable, but I also noted that during my retirement physical the medic had to take my blood pressure three times before it was inside acceptable standards and pointed out that I could prove I have high blood pressure if I came off my meds, but there was also a possibility that the lack of medicine may create some adverse medical issues and considering the fact that doctors take an oath to first do no harm it seemed like a ludicrous idea. I have to admit I was a tad bit fed up with VA.

I had taken an early out in 1993 and went back on active duty in 1998. When I turned in my claim I told them that the claim was based entirely on the last period of active duty and that THEIR regulation prohibited them from collecting my VA check to pay off my SSB. When I came back from my exam, I once again told them this information. On three separate occasions I told them on the phone the information. So of course when I was awarded my disability they bagan to collect the money. It took me 5 months to get that straightened out.

Tim

Vet and proud of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use