Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hearing Loss And Tinnitus Claim.

Rate this question


Gomatic

Question

2 questions.

1, My MOS is obsolete, will the VA use a modern equivalent based on my job title. I was a 63Y 10 tracked vehicle mechanic.

2. The Army did not do a hearinfg exam on my exit physical, will this give me a problem?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

28 years is a lot of time the VA could use against you. JMO..I think you would be better off claiming an increase for your back issues, or even secondary claims such as;..Hip, knees, right foot issues due to your lower back. When were you granted these 2 claims? If the 2 exams for hearing were sever enough like donna said to grant an award, then go ahead and give it a try.

Coot

I was just rated for the Ankle and back. My VSO sent a NOD on the hearing and tinnitus.

Gomatic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gomatic,

I did not think I had a snowball's chance in %#*$ of succeeding in a claim for hearing loss and tinnitus until I found the hadit web site. At the time I filed my claim It had been over 40 years since I was discharged from the Marine Corps and I had worked in civilian law enforcement for almost 30 years after my discharge. I passed a hearing exam to enlist in the Marine Corps and according to the Marine Corps I passed a hearing exam just prior to my discharge. I have had a bilateral high frequency hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus since I was in the Marine Corps due to the exposure of firing 105 mm howitzers in Vietnam without hearing protection.

After doing some research and gathering input from some knowledgeable people on the hadit web site, I assembled my evidence and filed my claim using the advice and guidance I received. My MOS was not a problem since I was a field artillery batteryman. My biggest problem was the time that had passed since my discharge. Also, I figured the VA would attribute my hearing loss and tinnitus to my exposure to firearms while employed as a law enforcement officer after my military discharge.

I did have a hearing exam by a civilian audiologist in 1978, eight years after my discharge. The 1978 exam indicated I had a bilateral noise induced high frequency hearing loss and tinnitus. The 1978 exam also noted my exposure to artillery in the military. Fortunately I found the same audiologist (now a doctor of audiology) still practicing and had her conduct a new hearing exam on me in 2010. I provided her with my copy of the 1978 exam results. I advised her that I had never fired my weapon in the line of duty while employed as a civilian law enforcement officer and only fired small arms weapons twice a year for firearms qualification. I asked her to provide me with an IMO and I provided her with an example of what is needed in the IMO. She provided the IMO which proved to be the difference in my claim being successful. In the IMO, my audiologist stated my hearing loss and tinnitus were "as likely as not" caused by my exposure to the firing of artillery weapons during my service in the Marine Corps.

My military records indicated I had a whisper hearing test just prior to my discharge and the test indicated my hearing was within normal limits. However, during my research I discovered the VA does not recognize the whisper test as a reliable indicator of whether or not an individual has a high frequency hearing loss. According to my VA C&P exam for hearing loss, the audiologist stated it was as likely as not that my tinnitus was caused by my military service. However, the same audiologist stated she was unable to determine the etiology of my hearing loss without speculating. Fortunately the VA deciding official gave me the benefit of the doubt and agreed with the IMO from my private Doctor of Audiology and granted me 10% for hearing loss and 10% for tinnitus. The hearing exam results from the VA's audiologist was almost identical to the hearing exam results from my private audiologist.

As part of my evidence for my claim, I also submitted a statement in support of claim from my wife verifying the hearing loss and tinnitus since I was in the Marine Corps and I submitted photos of myself in Vietnam firing the howitzers without wearing hearing protection. I also provided my own statement in support of claim explaining my limited exposure to the firing of weapons (twice a year during qualifications) while employed as a civilian law enforcement officer.

I have an audiology consult scheduled for March 12th so I can get hearing aids from the VA. This is something else I did not know I was entitled to until Carlie and others on the hadit web site made me aware of it.

I wish you luck on your hearing loss claim.

Georgiapapa...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gomatic

Based on your response to Cooter, you have had a C & P for hearing loss and have been denied. Can you post what your results were if you have them. Your test would have consisted of you hearing different sounds at 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz. There may have been more but, these are the important ones. If you have the test results can you post the

results of these four frequencies. Also, they should have had you listen to some one or two syllable words and those results should be a percentage number like 85%. Can you post those as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gomatic

Based on your response to Cooter, you have had a C & P for hearing loss and have been denied. Can you post what your results were if you have them. Your test would have consisted of you hearing different sounds at 1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz. There may have been more but, these are the important ones. If you have the test results can you post the

results of these four frequencies. Also, they should have had you listen to some one or two syllable words and those results should be a percentage number like 85%. Can you post those as well?

Left 500 25 db 1000 30 db 2000 40 db 3000 40 db 4000 45 db 100% descrimination

Right 500 25db 1000 25db 2000 35db 3000 40db 4000 35 db 100% descrimination

They denied the hearing loss and tinnitus because in thier it opinnion it was not service connected because there was no mention of it in my military records. The Army didn't even do a hearinfg exam on my exit physical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in a field artillery battery in the early 70s and have had tinnitus since then. When i was awarded 50% they denied my tinnitus claim. I let it go but was and am unhappy about it. They said I had a hearing test when I was discharged. Not so. I was given a C&P exam but it was for hearing loss. Tinnitus occurs when the DBs are elevated and the ringing starts, as in my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use