Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Form To Request C File From Ro

Rate this question


jbasser

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is the form to request your C File.

http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/3288.pdf

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Requested mine the second time from St Pete on Feb 2012. Never got it. Never will get it. Never have even seen it. Hell, it may not exist.

(C-File) Got a letter from the RO today 6/29/13. They finally acknowledged that I requested it. They said that I am in line to get a copy as they work them in the order that they get them.

Edited by Slowlane

You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A concern of mine is that when a denial exists, and the appeal period has expired, and the veteran or representative finally receives a C file copy. - - -

The denial often contains general language to the effect that the c file contents were reviewed/considered. Yet the denial may also contain language

saying there wasn't supporting evidence in the c file. Yet again, the veteran has copies of the records sent to the VA by and/either the veteran, the military services, or private medical records that show some evidence of a service relationship.

This leaves several problems/issues to surmount.

Did the VA actually see and consider the evidence?

Did the VA dismiss or try to negate the evidence?

Did the evidence actually make it into the C file?

Is the evidence still in the C file, if it was there in the past?

(A record of an old denial has actually disappeared from my C file, even though other paper (VA internal forms entries, etc.) Show that something was done that is not reflected in the current existing records. More frustrating was that the Chicago VARO was originally the denying VARO, and Atlanta is these days.

Was the evidence possibly "top sheeted"?

What happens when the C File is digitized?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I requested and got mine in about 6 weeks. When I got to the BVA I found that BVA judge had about twice as much of my file as I did. My lawyer requested what the judge had right then and there. How can you get a fair hearing when you don't have the same evidence as you adversay?"

Hmmmm - when I think about it, there seemed to be a whole lot more in my file at the hearing than what I recall getting. I got a lot. It took 2 priority boxes to send it. But the judge had a stack about 2 feet high. I didn't get a chance to look through it though, because the VSO had the file before the hearing. Is there a way to request just the stuff I don't have?

I got a copy of my C-file, but it was missing the back side of the medical opinion used to deny my claim. I kept asking for a copy of the rest of the opinion - and they kept telling me I had to send them the date the opinion was written and the name of the doctor who wrote it to get a copy. How in the world would I know who wrote it when I didn't have a copy of the part of the opinion he signed? I finally contacted an email Berta posted of people who were supposed to help with survivor benefits. They emailed back and said they would forward my email to the appropriate person. After months of trying to get a copy of the medical opinion - the VA sent me another copy of the whole C-file. But they also let me know that it was my SECOND copy and that I would be charged if I wanted anything else. (I hadn't asked for an entire second copy. I had just asked for a complete copy of the VA medical opinion that was used to file my claim).

I sure don't want to pay for copies of ALL that stuff. But I would be interested in getting a copy of the stuff that is in my file that I don't have yet.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use