Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Please Help If You Have Any Knowledge

Rate this question


infantry10

Question

In 2008 I was awarded my unemployability and have been receiving payvat 100% rate (with benefits) ever since. I was sent a questionare form in Sept 2012 (so they say) but never received it. In early Jan 2013 I got a letter in the mail saying I never returned the qyestionare form and my pay would go hack to 60%. I immediately called the 800 number and the form was faxed to me. I faxed it back the same day (which it shows in VA system) but was given a fax number to the PA office which I later found out was a huge problem. It was supposed to be faxed to my regional office in WV not to PA. I have filled out all the correct forms, even had to do a new C&P exam. My local state office says, they've never seen this happen before. When I log onto the ebenefits site it shows I have a new claim as of Jan 22. My pay is currently less than 1/3 of what I've been receiving and it's put a huge problem on me financially. The ebenefits site shows I'm at preparation for decision phase which ive been at for 2 months. If anyone has any advice to give, it would be grately appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

did you get a job or do any volunteer work that would contradict your unemployability?

It sounds like they proposed to reduce your % with the letter in Sep 2012 and then reduced you in Jan 2013 due to not returning letter. Then they opened a new claim after you returned the letter.

Do you have any other medical evidence of the severity of your condition or how it affects your ability to get a job? If so I would submit that evidence soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since they say they did not get the form back - all I can think

of at this point is just keep waiting OR

if you don't have a VSO, you could go get one and see if

they can find something out.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read numerous CAVC decisions documenting this phenomenon. Being TDIU, one is always susceptible to being called back in to be reexamined within the first 5 to 10 years. After a certain period, they award P&T but until they do, one false step like this will provoke exactly what you are describing. Assuming you have not changed your mailing address since this began in 2002, VA will use the Presumption of Regularity to say they mailed it and you got it (regardless of what happened). The Veteran's Presumption of Normal Intelligence states you wouldn't blow off something this important and probably didn't get the letter.

In order to combat it, you have to refile the form they wanted and get on ebenefits and upload some serious documentation medically to preserve that original TDIU. Any way you look at it, you're in for a slugging match.

I have no doubt you will get it back but you're entitled to an unbroken chain of compensation. VA will eventually regrant it but will reinstate it effective when you eventually heard about it and complied. You can fight it to the CAVC and you'll win in 8 years. VA is willing to spend a million denying you $20 K in back pay and will. They do it every day. You might try a VSO but I'd consider that a last resort. The IRIS or ebennies avenue may get a much quicker response. Fix it now. Don't let it fester. Never forget the Congressional Inquiry hand grenade either.

38 CFR §4.13 states:

Effect of change of diagnosis

The repercussion upon a current rating of service connection when change is made of a previously assigned diagnosis or etiology must be kept in mind. The aim should be the reconciliation and continuance of the diagnosis or etiology upon which service connection for the disability had been granted.

Applicability of 38 CFR § 3.103 (a)(b)(2).

38 CFR § 3.103 (a) deals with procedural due process and appellate rights. Section (a) states:

(a) Statement of policy. Every claimant has the right to written notice of the decision made on his or her claim, the right to a hearing, and the right of representation. Proceedings before VA are ex parte in nature, and it is the obligation of VA to assist a claimant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim and to render a decision which grants every benefit that can be supported in law while protecting the interests of the Government

Section (b) (2) describes the reduction of ratings:

(2) Advance notice and opportunity for hearing. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, no award of compensation, pension or dependency and indemnity compensation shall be terminated, reduced or otherwise adversely affected unless the beneficiary has been notified of such adverse action and has been provided a period of 60 days in which to submit evidence for the purpose of showing that the adverse action should not be taken.

38 CFR §3.105 states:

(e) Reduction in evaluation—compensation. Where the reduction in evaluation of a service-connected disability or employability status is considered warranted and the lower evaluation would result in a reduction or discontinuance of compensation payments currently being made, a rating proposing the reduction or discontinuance will be prepared setting forth all material facts and reasons. The beneficiary will be notified at his or her latest address of record of the contemplated action and furnished detailed reasons therefor, and will be given 60 days for the presentation of additional evidence to show that compensation payments should be continued at their present level. Unless otherwise provided in paragraph (i) of this section, if additional evidence is not received within that period, final rating action will be taken and the award will be reduced or discontinued effective the last day of the month in which a 60-day period from the date of notice to the beneficiary of the final rating action expires.

One thing necessary is a medical examination for something like this, not just a Form 21- "fill this out and send it in". But then we're talking the VA here, not Social Security, huh?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just download the form and send it to them each year without waiting for them to send you a form. This is what I have done for the last 5 years. This does not fix your situation now but it will for the future. Send it certified mail/return receipt. If you are not P&T you should ask for that when you get your TDIU back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use