Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Certification Of Appeal

Rate this question


MPsgt

Question

The VARO just posted a Certification of Appeal dated 07/23/2013 for my TDIU claim. They've been working the claim just about two years already. My Veterans Service Officer was trying to get a DRO before it ever left for BVA. At this point, is it already to late to get the DRO. If it is, I'm up the creek without a paddle for two to three years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I just received a scheduling for a Travel Board Hearing in Louisville, KY dated for 09/09/2013. My service officer will be there to speak on my behalf. According to the letter, I need to be available for several hours. Because there will be several other claimants going before the same board. In a nut shell, what can I expect from this board? Will I be required to speak too?

"Up the creek for two to three years". In order for your appeal to be certified to bva you had to have submitted a Form 9. The date that you signed that Form 9 is the docket date you will receive when your files are actually received at the bva. Keep in mind also that if you have sent in any new evidence to the varo while waiting on that dro review, and the varo has not issused a soc or ssoc on that new evidence BEFORE actually sending the files to bva then you really are screwed. This forces bva to remand for procedural errors, UNLESS you have an ironclad case you can win, therefore it would not prejudice you in anyway not to been issued the soc/ssoc... Let's hope so...Another barrier while at bva is if you have a poa with any vso..They are the ones who really contribute to the backlog while at the bva. Good thing for you is that you have 2 years already into your docket date to be heard at bva. Last i heard from case management was bva were on 2011 docket dates to be worked. Good Luck..........

This concerns me:

"My Veterans Service Officer was trying to get a DRO before it ever left for BVA"

Did you or the DAV respond to the SOC in time to request a DRO review?

Please check me and correct me.... someone here -----

but I think the response time is 60 days for SOC and 30 days for SSOC in which one can request a DRO review.?

I had a case transferred to the BVA quite some time ago, after many years at the VARO and things moved faster at that point....

I made sure the BVA had my evidence (sent them copies of all the good stuff the RO had ignored) and rebutted the C & P exam the BVA had ordered

on a remand. I sent everything directly to the BVA and used their ombudsman from time to time via email to make sure they had all of my stuff.

"Faster" at the BVA is a relative word however.

Claim filed in 2003. BVA award 2008, retro took until 2009....the retro became a battle of it's own due to FTCA issue.

But I knew the BVA could read and it was far easier to await their proper decision ,once they got the case.

I still dont get what the VSO said he/she was 'trying' to do.

Do you have a copy of your signed request (or his/hers) for the DRO review?

.

The VA almost shipped my claim off to the BVA even though I did have a NOD with a DRO request that was in their hands. You have to keep your eye on them and check frequently yourself. You can't depend on some VSO to do this for you. I know that is a shock, but true knowledge to old timers. VSO's have caused me much grief over the years. Piss poor representation to the point of malpractice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring your evidence with you . Use Manila folders and tab them as to what specific evidence they contain.

Focus on the reason why, per your I-9 form, their decision was wrong.

I am glad the service officer will be therewith you but ,it is best to be prepared yourself.

This is good news in my opinion and could change the tide for you hopefully.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring your evidence with you . Use Manila folders and tab them as to what specific evidence they contain.

Focus on the reason why, per your I-9 form, their decision was wrong.

I am glad the service officer will be therewith you but ,it is best to be prepared yourself.

This is good news in my opinion and could change the tide for you hopefully.

Thank you for all the information :smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is important that you don't submit any other evidence let it proceed if not your case will be sent back to the beginning phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or... cut the Gordian Knot and sign a Waiver of Review and let the Veterans Law Judge review the new evidence (if any) and decide without remanding it back to the RO for a one-year round trip remand for a de novo decision. How did this get so far down the road with no DRO review? When they send you your initial denial, it clearly asks you which path you would like to pursue- i.e. 1) traditional appeal or 2) DRO review. This is years before you get the SOC or file a Form 9. I'm confused here. Is the VSO lost in space or am I missing something? You say you filed your NOD in December 2011. Did you ask for a DRO Review then? Or, I guess, more appropriately, did your service representative ask for one?

As for your travel Board Hearing, I sure hope you plan to speak. That's why you asked for it, right? You have to impress upon the VLJ who hears your case that you are honest and above board. This is your golden opportunity to convince this individual that you are, for all intents and purposes, unemployable. Every piece of info you have corroborating this should be with you when you testify. Chances are, your Service Rep. is inundated with Vets as you mentioned and no one knows the facts of your case better than you. Best of Luck, sir.

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use