Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Always Claims They Dont Receive The Evidence!

Rate this question


Navy04

Question

I filed my Current FDC claim in Oct 14 and it just went to Prep for Decision on 12/22. At the bottom of the claims status page it states" Below is new and material evidence that we did not receive from you for previously denied lower back pain", WTH!! I uploaded the evidence a month ago via Ebenefits, have the print out for it, and mailed the evidence at the same time to the VA Evidence Intake Center. What irritates the Hell out of me is that I had this issue with my last claim, where the VA stated they did not receive evidence for this same issue, yet again I had the print outs from the site with date and time that evidence was uploaded. I am so tired of this Bull Crap where as Veterans we go above and beyond to go thru the 3 Ring Circus called the VA and Comp Exams with Looney Disgruntled Docs, then we have to chase the VA to give them our Evidence that they should have already, then the VA gives us the Damn runaround thru the whole process, even if the claim is granted in the end. I am sorry that I ranted on folks. God Bless and I hope all you Vets and Supporters have a great Christmas. I will keep you guys posted.

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

One thing to remember is to do everything in writing. "If it can't be read, it wasn't said!" We are all guilty of this, cuz it's easier to "call" than to take the time to write and send whatever our correspondence is. If you do call, always send a follow-up letter(and email) stating what was said and how you interpreted/understood what was stated. It's an added layer of protection! jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Navy04: I really think most at the VA are trying to do their job to the best of their ability Our problem is, we don't really know if the VA employee handling our C-File or Case in general is a Victim of the "Peter Principle," meaning they've reached their level of incompetence. I think most of the "Old Dog" Vets heard something about the 10% rule regarding everything from civilian to military personnel, that's everybody, Right. 10% of all VA employees gets to a scary number.

With all that said, I think it comes down to the Vet doing his due diligence when it comes to submitting any and all Evidence or any other Document to the VA. US Mail Cert RTN Recp has always been the preferred and recommended method of delivery, right. How do you or anyone else know exactly what was in the envelope?

Paper Trail, Paper Trail! Think about recent IRS Scandal, deleted emails are a NO NO, big time. Most Private Copanies and all State and Federal Agencies are prohibited by Federal And State Regulations regarding Emails and any other electronic communication. Before I started Scanning to PDF and attaching documents to my VA claims, I would do the US Mail thing and also "HAND Deliver" to my VARO. Get the original date stamped by the Receiving Staff and a copy of the doc with the VA Stamp on it. "Over Kill" some would say. My claim, my money and definitely my decision. I think more is better than less, right. CMA-CMA-CMA! A little extra time and money is worth the peace of mind, they got it and can't say they didn't.

Semper Fi

gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree with all.

Very frustrating with information not getting in the correct hands and especially to decision makers whom make the ultimate call on claims.

I don't know how the system can be rectified except by creating more man power and more information centers to ensure information is uploaded.

This a frustrating part of the process and probably attributes to at least 55% of the dysfunction in the claims process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks again for the support guys. Just don't know how much more we can do to make the VAs job easier. We do all the hard work, and research, yet in the end it is up to a majority of Idiots to decide our Outcome!!!

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Folks:

It's interesting because I filed a FDC with "all" evidence and it was turned into the Regional Office. But, now , I'm not so sure that all of the the evidence that I turned in is still there? The reason I say that is that I filed a FOIA and when I went to find out whay it's taking so long the Privacy Officer held up what was supposed to be my C-File and the package was way too small? I turned in about 1200-1500 documents and the package represented about 300 pages? Supposedly, when I turned in my package, the VBA was supposed to be digitising those files? Also, recently, they have doubled the completion time estimates? So, my confidence is at a very low level at this point that all of the evidence is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I want to go look at my File when it seems things are dragging. I have done this more than once and found major problems. Back in 2002 I had asked for a DRO Hearing on advice from some here at Hadit. I went to the VARO to look at my file and found out the VA was waiting around to send my claim to the BVA. I nixed that fast because I did not want a three year wait when I had all the evidence I needed to win at the VARO. If it seems something is wrong with the way your claim is going then there probably is something wrong. I would rather keep my claim local where I can check in person to see what evidence they have rather than FDC where I can't see what is going on at all. I used the FDC system once. It took just as long due to VA screw up. They had all the evidence they needed but delayed my claim saying they were waiting for 5103 waiver request. I made sworn statements that my claim was ready to rate and I had no more evidence. Finally, after trips to congressmen and senators the VA got off their asses and sent me for C&P which just confirmed my evidence and I was awarded an increase in a month. This took about 14 months to do the simplest claim imaginable.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use