Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Letter From The Va To Reduce Tdiu

Rate this question


321Iamdone

Question

Hello my husband is rated 70% currently for major depressive disorder and panic disorder without agoraphobia (claimed as depression) 50% since 03/2010
tinea versicolor (claimed as skin condition) 30% since 03/2010, proposed to reduced to 0%
residuals, left hand injury with degenerative arthritis of pinky finger metacarpocarpal joint 10% since 03/2010
intermittent vertigo 0% since 03/2010
ganglion cyst, dorsum of left wrist 10% since 03/2010
we received a letter from the VA saying they proposed to reduce his rating from 70% to 60%, because he had a C&P and the examiner just looked at his back for 2 seconds and said he is clear of his versicolor and the exam was over. Well we went to another doctor( outside the VA, and that doctor stated he still had it and prescribed medication for it. In the letter, the VA stated in order to get 10% for versiclor, my husband had to have been prescribed a steroid type medication not a topical anti fungal cream. Well he received an anti fungal cream, but they still said they will drop his percentage to 0% for his versicolor.
Then a few weeks later we received another letter stating that they will stop his TDIU he have been receiving for 2 years, because the propose rating will make him not qualify for TDUI, because he will now be 60% instead of 70%
.
My questions is this, he had a C%P done a few weeks ago and it was for both the versicolor and his depression. They found him unemployable for his depression and kept him at 50%, and of course said he was clear of his versicolor and proposed to drop that from 30% to 0%
How can we fight this? Can he still receive TDIU, even though he is 60% and still considered unemployable? Any help on this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Also my husband receives SSD solely based on his service connected disability.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I have never heard of the VA taking away TDIU from a vet who is not able to work due solely to his SC disabilities. As Bronco says they must evaluate him under normal conditions of life which means when he is working. The regulation actually states that you are entitled to TDIU if you are unable to work due solely to your SC disabilities. The 70% rating requirement is an after thought. The intent of the regulation was to compensate vets who could not work due to SC disability. I would request a hearing right away if you have a letter stating they intend to reduce your TDIU. You might even consult with a lawyer who does VA work. They could pull a stunt on all of us if this reduction is legal. I have been TDIU for 15 years. I am 65 years old. Would they expect me to go out and get a job now?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Then a few weeks later we received another letter stating that they will stop his TDIU he have been receiving for 2 years, because the propose rating will make him not qualify for TDUI, because he will now be 60% instead of 70%"
.



"I wrote a letter explaining that we wanted an hearing and explained in detail why they should not stop his TDIU. and attached a copy of the other doctor diagnose and opinion."

GREAT!

"Also my husband receives SSD solely based on his service connected disability."

Was the VA aware of that fact when they made the initial TDIU decision?

If not then, are they aware of that SSDI award now?

This is Bull Crap! Most if not all SSDI awards solely for one established SC, get a VA rating of 100%.or TDIU paid at the 100% rate.

They might have committed a CUE in this proposed reduction.

Can you scan and attach (cover c file number, name, address first)

their reasons and basis for the proposed reduction?

And also the Evidence list in the decision?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you all for your responses, I really appreciated. Here is a copy of what the V.A. has sent my husband.

We also fed ex a request for a hearing next day delivery, with signature required, along with our evidence to support why they should not stop his TDIU. along with faxing it to them as well.

Some of the evidence is their decision on his recent C&P on his Major Depressing Disorder, which last week the doctor added PTSD to his mental condition.

The most important part on their decision about his mental condition, stating that my husband has difficulty in adapting to work, difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances, difficulty in adapting to a work like setting, in addition to, occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school family relations, judgment, thinking or mood.

They assigned him a 50% rating, saying that the rating remain the same, since approving his TDIU on March 2013.

His MD is the reason for TDIU, so since that did not change, I am totally confused on why they are proposing to stop hid TDIU.

I hope and pray after sending all the medical evidence and letter explaining why they should not stop his TDIU, they will continue his TDIU.

we have all his med records uptodate, and along with his new diagnose of PTSD, he also has an appointment for a hand surgeon about his cyst that wont go away.

their is nothing in his records that suggest his is employable, in fact it says quite the opposite. My husband has not worked since leaving the army back in 2010, that was his last job!!

I will keep you all posted on how this goes, and again thank you all for your input and wealth of knowledge!!

post-20271-0-28870800-1437143174_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

that page doesn't really tell me anything other than they are proposing to remove unemployability. if it hasn't been granted yet, then how can they propose a reduction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use