Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

Explain the SMC requirement

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Hey Bergie,
If it was simple, like SMC-K, everyone would be able to grasp it within a few reads. I'm still not totally convinced that I have a solid grasp on it either. The VA could have done a better job clarifying it. If they would have added some "real world" examples, it could make a big difference.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bergie, If you have a few minutes, listen to this. It is a good Explanation of smc S

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/haditcom/2015/11/05/haditcom-blog-talk-radio-show-wednesday-110415-700-pm-eastern-asknod

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Let me expand my comment. In this thread alone, I see several errors just in the participants who contributed. To begin with, to understand this as clearly as possible, let's turn it into "Buckwheat speak" to get rid of the CFR junk that often clogs up understanding. Mr. James Buie's case in 2011 is the best one ever documented and is the most cited to when Vets claim SMC S. Ken Carpenter knocked this one out of the park. VA was not gonna go quietly into the night on SMC S so it took a unique set of circumstances -a confluence of events if you will- that could create the perfect SMC Storm.

 https://asknod.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/cavc-buie-5-v-shinseki-0-2011/

Watch how he slowly builds up to SMC S. At the end, to qualify, Buie rearranged the order in which he received them. Another thing I wish to clarify. A secondary condition to a primary rated one is not inferior. If you have PTSD or MDD secondary to losing your hearing from a IED, it is just as important in counting to qualify for SMC.  I am rated 100% schedular for hepatitis and 100% schedular for porphyria, secondary to the hepatitis. Either one can be the predicate to serve as the base 100% for the first SMC S requirement-i.e. that you have at least a 100% rating. See? It doesn't have to be 100% schedular. A TDIU rating is 100% for rating purposes.  Likewise,Buck, your 70% for PTSD stands alone as the predicate for your TDIU-again the 100% base for SMC S. You do not need to add to it to make a combined rating of 100% to qualify for the first part.  You are TDIU solely on the 70% PTSD.

Alternatively, if f you have one rating of at least 40% and others that will take you to 70%, then they are the predicate for TDIU paid at 100%. This is important for you Navy04. You have enough to qualify for TDIU BUT ALSO have enough separate and distinct disabilities that combine (with VA math) to qualify you for SMC S.

VA is required to tell you which of your disabilities (if you have less than a single 60% disability to qualify for TDIU) that they are using to grant your TDIU. If Navy04 has a 70% PTSD rating, that alone qualifies for the TDIU all by itself. Everything else is the gravy for the SMC S. All he needs is the 50% and a 10% to make 55% which rounds up to the magical 60% extra for SMC S. If anything, Navy 04 has way more than he needs to get there. VSOs  do not have any idea how this works and VA will not tell you. You have to fight for it. I have had many DROs tell me the party stops at 100% and there's no more money on the table.

Never think it cannot be done. Never quit asking questions but always try to seek the answer with the available resources first. If the regs do not answer the question, go further afield and research it. The good thing here is Navy 04 will get his SMC S entitlement from the day he can prove he had the required ratings to qualify-not the day he applies for it. 

Navy zero 4 is cleared in hot. Weapons are free, gentlemen. Make it count.

That's a far more concise and clear explanation than I could come up with!

Congratulations are in order! This deserves to be somehow flagged as a must read for those involved with SMC claims.

As far as I can tell, moving beyond SMC-S (or SMC-S-1 as it's occasionally referred to, with the last number somehow related to the SMC table?) is often a matter of VA subjective judgment, and I shudder to think of how the VA can screw that up! Certainly, there are cut and dried examples, but they cover very limited circumstances.  It's also worthy of note that the VA has a record of ignoring SMC-S entitlement, until a veteran complains. The initial VA response to the complaint, as I experienced it, was to tell the veteran to file an appeal, just further delaying resolution. This may be a situation that benefits from the "call/email "bob" option.  (It certainly helped in my case!)    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with jbasser and Bergie

I like ready all these post no matter how many times the questions come up  that's how I learn &I  appreciate any hadit member for the help they give out.  &lots on information can be heard on Jbasser and jerrel Cooks Hadit radio show  get ya a pen or pencil and write down the great information they have on ther shows and if your able to hear well you can call in ask your questions.

I had a question about SMC's...I think we all agree about what % it take us to get there

100%plus 60%  or TDIU P&T With an extra 60% added in

 

ok here is a question...My disability's are Loss of Hearing with Tinnitus and PTSD/PTSD has not been approved or Service connected yet  I'm working on that at present.

Alright  beings I am TDIU P&T for the Hearing loss and say I get 70% for PTSD

That should quailfy me for SMC's HouseBound because I very seldom leave the house other than VA Appointments...now heres the Kicker VA trys to deny with

they say if you can go to the VAMC for Appointments  then your not house bound and deny's the claim but yet you are 160%plus service connected with multi disabilitys.

I do not like to be around people no matter who it is even my children and realtives and friends alike

I go to my appointments but its hard but I need my medications  that's my only reason to get out of the house.

 

HouseBound should work for the mental impaired as well as the physical Impaired  Right??

VA just sees the physical parts.

 

So on behave of Bergie & all the rest of us veterans...whats a veteran to do with  a high rating of PTSD 60 or 70% that does qualify for HouseBound  and is denied  simply for the fact that VA says he can/she can get out of his house for Dr's Appoinments then all of a sudden your not HB?...this has been there way to deny a veterans for years.

Its not fair in my opinion.

 

Sorry Bergie  I did not intentionally hi-jack your thread.

 

.........Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"heres the Kicker VA trys to deny with

they say if you can go to the VAMC for Appointments  then your not house bound and deny's the claim but yet you are 160%plus service connected with multi disability's."

 

Actually the courts ruled that statutory housebound exists when you cannot leave the house for/to work.

The VA is failing to recognize the difference between the two, and the levels of preparation needed when it uses this sort of rationale.

But, it does seem reasonable on the surface to do so, creating a situation that the VA can take advantage of.

Further, the VA has been known to fail to comply with the law/regs concerning SMC consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use