Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% TDIU P&T Question

Rate this question


foreveryoung

Question

Good afternoon all.

I was rated 100% TDIU P&T a few years back with 90% scheduler. Recently I was awarded a new SC disability rated at 50%, so that moved me to 100% secular, still showing the P&T. 

My question is; does the TDIU go away, and since I was already paid at the 100% TDIU rate, does any of that change due to the new rating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If VA does the right thing  when a veteran has a combined rating of 60 tp 90% using the ''extra scheduler'' for TDIU P&T & later applies for increase or for another SC Condition and has a combined rating of 90% and is rated at least 10% the VA should  take the TDIU away and make the veteran a 100% scheduler rating  &  if the veteran warrants a 60% above the 100% then the veteran should request SMC's...because some times the VA don't mention that.

 

jmo

 

..........Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was awarded 100% TDIU P&T first, with 90% scheduler a few years ago. I applied for a few other secondary SC disabilities in the last 20 months and so far was awarded another 50% rating. So currently I have (1) 60%, (2) 50%, (1) 40%, (1) 10%, and (3) 0%, Plus (1) SMC (K-1).

When I received the new rating last month for 50% my 90% scheduler moved to 100%, and the TDIU is not shown on ebenefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Ok, interesting.  I guess you know that ebenefits is usually wrong?  What did your rating decision say?  Did it say that TDIU was being removed since you were awarded 100% schedular?  

Unless you are seeking statuatory SMC S, (100 plus 60)  then it may not make a lot of difference between IU and 100%.  Based upon my experience, tho, VA does not want to award TDIU AND 100 percent schedular, in no small part because they dont want to pay SMC S to Vets.

VA's computers may not even allow 100% schedular and TDIU at the same time, but  you could/should email Iris and ask them what happened to your TDIU.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have one 60% SC'd rating, and the other ratings reach the level needed for TDIU, then you should be eligible for SMC.

A problem has been that the VA automatically "eats" the 60% first. The court cases require that the VA uses the most favorable method allowed by th laws, and eating the 60% first is not always the most favorable to the veteran. To me, from what was shown in the previous post listing the ratings, you should have been awarded TDIU + SMC.  

I'd set aside the 60%, use the calculator referenced in Hadit, and see what the result is.  2x 50% and the 40% certainly reach TDIU levels. The additional 60% single rating

would in theory, to me, meet the SMC S requirement, which is roughly an additional 10% per month, with the SMC K in addition to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Based upon what you posted, you should apply for SMC S, under Bradley Vs. Peake.  While it would appear you meet the criteria, VA is very anal about which condition(s) caused your IU.  Apply anyway, let them figure it out, and appeal if you dont agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use