Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

TDIU letter

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

I was recently re-evaluated for PC and my new rating will be 90%. My disability ratings are 60% for loss of sphincter muscle control, 40% urinary incontinence, 30% HL, 20% DM II, 10% tinnitus. I want to have my gastro doc write a letter stating that I am unemployable due to the sphincter issue. Any ideas how it should read? I have sent a letter of disagreement to the VA.

Edited by boomer2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Your nexus needs to say something close to this:

The Veteran is "at least as likely as not" (or Is unemployable)  unemployable  due to service connected conditions of xxxx, yyy, and/or z.  Loss of bladder control/incontinence is not compatable with employment.  

I can not hardly beleive the VA is so cruel to deny this (if they know about it, and how could they not?)  

Post the reasons for denial, if you like.  

YOUR NOD should "refute" their reasons for denial with medical evidence.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Is your NOD a response to an "Inferred IU follow-up claim?" What did the Denial state as evidence considered and reason for the Denial?

Are you receiving SSDI or have a claim in for it?

The DM II and Tinnitus are the least of your medical problems. I can't believe your (2) main SC issues haven't caused you considerable mental anguish. Might be time to see a VA Mental Health Clinician. Any MH issue associated with your SC conditions would probably be eligible for a "Secondary SC" rating. File the claim, let the VA figure it out with a MH C & P.

As to you being currently unemployable, VA Raters like to use "Sedentary Employment" eligibility as a basis for denying IU. Just you saying you can't work at your old job isn't enough, if you could work at any type of employment (even Home based) earning in excess of $238.75 per week your screwed.

You just filed your NOD and your looking for New & Material Evidence, give consideration to meeting with a VA Vocational Rehabilitation Counceler. Apply on-line for VA Chapter 35 benefits, meet with a Councilor and if they agree your SC conditions preclude you from doing any type of work, including Sedentary, a Denial Letter will be the best evidence you could supply for IU. If you get the letter, send it to the VA right away, don't set on it. You may get your Denial Reversed by an Automatic Review of your claim triggered by the receipt of N & M Evidence.

You could also use the Voc Rehab Denial Letter to qualify for your States 100% SC or IU Vets property Tax Exemption, while your waiting on your appeal. That's worked for a couple of my Nam Buds, give it a try.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This was not a denial for TDIU. I have been rated at 100% for PC for the past 2 years and this is the re-evaluation. I am in the 60 day time frame after the notification of intent to reduce. I am trying to get TDIU for the loss of sphincter control and urinary issues. I am 71 years old so I am not working. I will check into the chapter 35 benefits.

Edited by boomer2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Have you asked for a hearing regarding the reduction?  You are 71 years old.   Do they expect you to go back to work to support yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Apparently there is no age when the VA quits screwing with the veteran. Just so you know this is the kind of thing that needs to be directed at robert.a.mcdonald@va.gov and he has given out his personal phone number which is (513) 509-8454 to the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use