Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

BVA denies EVERYTHING

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

I would have guessed this would never happen, but my recent decision was denied.:

1.  SC for sleep apnea was denied.  I had "challenged" the competency of the 2015 C and P exam, who had admitted to me she had no training or experience in sleep medicine. The 2007 Board certified doc had opinied that my sleep apnea was "the result of" SC depression.  No matter.  The board picked the incompetent, c and p doc over the Board certified sleep specialiast opinion and gave no reasons and bases why. 

2.  TDIU was denied. The Board substituted their own unsubstantiated opinion that I was not unemployable, and "discounted" ONE of 5 docs who had opined I was unemployable due to SC condtions.  The BOard did not discuss my 2005 decision where I was awarded NSC pension because I was unemployable (but did not meet the schedular requirements for IU).  In other words, in 2005, the RO admitted I was unemployable, but suggested it was Non Service reasons for sleep apnea.  Later the board decided I was not unemployable.

3.  Hearing loss increase was denied.  Again, they did not address my theory that VA misinterpreted 4.85b and put my numbers into the chart backwards.  

 

I was devastated, but am handling it better now.   If anyone has comments, I appreciate it. Thanks.  

If you are happy with your attorney, please send me their name/contact information.  Thanks.  

Congratulations to the Denver Broncos on their superbowl win.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

MacKlem: EAP Equals CUE

The decision in Leroy B. MacKlem v. Eric K. Shinkseki, Opinion Number 08-1409, decided August 10, 2010, involves a decision that was made through a now disallowed VA procedure, extraordinary award procedure (EAP). The Court initially denied the appeal by a single- judge memorandum decision but the decision was withdrawn and the Court found error in this panel decision.

The Veteran was a WWII veteran of the Occupation of Sicily. Prior to service he had been in a car wreck and injured his pelvis. He subsequently was discharged from the military with for a hip injury. He was initially granted a compensation rating but it was severed because the VA found the hip injury was a result of the car wreck and any aggravation was the natural progression of the injury.

The veteran claimed the VA had committed CUE in its decision. While the Court was downright antagonistic to the existence of actual CUE on the merits, the Court did find the VA erred in how it handled his case. After his allegations of CUE, the VA Regional Office proposed a decision that found CUE. However, this decision was changed through the extraordinary award procedure (EAP). EAP required certain awards by the Regional Office to be sent to the compensation and pension director for final determination. The directives creating EAP ordered the decisions granting extraordinary award shall not be disclosed to veterans or representatives and not that they were not to be told the original award had been reduced. EAP was invalidated by the Federal Circuit in Purple Heart v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs, 580 F.3d 1293 (1297 (Fed. Cir. 2009) in part because the procedure prevented a veteran from knowing what persuaded an unidentified decision-maker to reduce the award that was made by the persons before whom the hearing was held.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

broncovet

Check the dates and see what your time line is for appeal ASAP.

Apparently they don't want to look at older evidence, since they seem to ingnore your evidence (what it seems like to me) 

If you possible can?

I would go get a private specialist to do IME/IMO, Print out a good nexus letter, I call it a'' Physician Statement'' there getting wise to the nexus....and get with the Dr after and let him know what you need  a good Dr will help you , He needs to opine everything in your denial, & you basically need All this SC, if your getting SS Disability attach copy of your award letter & you write a good letter explaining why your entitled to these benefits and quote some of the CFR'S that pertain to your case, this will take some research but its well worth it.

if you need to which would probably be a good I deal go see this Dr a couple times, so he can state he is treating you under his care, 

Fight this buddy and fight this hard  with a one -two knock-out.

of course unless your just burned out and tired  then seek a good attorney and let him/her handle this.

I understand the stress this causes, do what you need to do to win.

I wish you the best

......................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Sorry to hear. I'm dealing with the BVA as well. 3/4 of my claim was remanded to RO and the other 1/4 was approved. Which was a no brainer. Nevertheless, keep after it, don't give up.

I'm a Patriots fan so I have really nothing nice to say about the Broncos. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

...Buck, it's an 'invalid URL,' so couldn't research it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

oh  okay  sorry I'll delete it.:sad:

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Broncovet, I am sorry for the denials from BVA. I am equally certain that you WILL prevail. It is sometimes possible to receive a six figure retro payment from BVA, as mine was after waiting for right about six years. As you said, I doubt that happens very often, and I was somewhat shocked as I had expected them to do staged ratings for the whole period. As Navy said earlier, you and the other elders have far more knowledge so I won't try to offer any advice, just support for whenever you need it!! Go Broncos!!(j/k Panthers fan, lol!) Go, Broncovet!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use