Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Traumatic Stress Disorder w/o Post TSD...WHAT?

Rate this question


kdavis478

Question

I was rated at 50% service connected Traumatic Stress Disorder after a severe TBI injury in which I was assaulted with a blunt object knocking me unconscious for several minutes. It was really bad and my head had a severe contusing and I still have the scarring to this day. Since I have been having progressively diminution cognitive issues as well as migraines and more recently been diagnosed to be bipolar which I had no issues before the incident. However, my confusion comes at why I was rate as a Traumatic Stress Disorder and not Post Traumatic Stress Disorder? Like they essentially are the same thing and the symptoms did not occur until after the incident meaning that it is "Post." This is extremely confusing to me as I have no explanation as to why. I can't even find anything in the Schedule Rating documentation. I really would like read up on it but I cannot. Please shed some light if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If you claimed both the TBI residuals and the PTSD, then they should have rated both of these disabilities separately.

I not exactly  clear on the rating.

Is it 50% for PTSD ( TSD-,which as you said should be PTSD) or was that 50% solely  a TBI residual rating?

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This now seems to be my mistake as I claimed the TBI and the symptoms accompanying the TBI however I was rated as Traumatic Stress Disorder. It was not Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. TBI related ratings are at 40, 70, and a 100 as I recall from my research but I was rated only 50% for the TSD. I don't understand why it just wouldn't be Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or just rated at the TBI ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I know that what you said makes sense....

 A TBI incident is almost always a stressor event. How could it not be a stressor....

But the VA does not deal with common sense.

This recent BVA decision explains my post above:

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp16/Files1/1600730.txt

In part it states:

"Adjudicators are to rate emotional/behavioral dysfunction under 38 C.F.R.
§ 4.130 (Schedule of ratings-mental disorders) when there is a diagnosis of a mental disorder.  When there is no diagnosis of a mental disorder, they are to evaluate emotional/behavioral symptoms under the criteria in the table titled "Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment and Other Residuals of TBI Not Otherwise Classified."  Id.

To gain the PTSD diagnosis, you need to file for PTSD. They have already acknowledged the stressor.

The rating will be comparable to your medical evidence under diagnostic code 9411.

Can you scan and attach here their decision as to the Reason and Bases part or their rationale and Evidence they used?

Cover C file # prior to scanning.

There are many BVA cases at www.bva.gov available under their search feature.

 

If you search for TBI PTSD in the top browser area and then rating in the second part , many cases will pop up and reveal the logic of VA at a higher

legal level than the ROs have.

BTW all, BVA has posted the 2016 decisions there.

 


 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Excellent post Ms berta!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Herein lies a conundrum. PTSD is categorized as a mental/psychological  condition, and TBI is a physical condition resulting from an injury/event.

The VA basically considers mental and physical conditions differently, except when they can use a "pyramiding" excuse to avoid one or the other.

In general, it's better to have a rating for a physical condition than a mental one if one or the other is a choice.  The obvious exception would be a large difference in the rating percentage between the two. I'm sure that the newness of TBI as a recognized SC condition is causing a lot of inconsistency in the way the VA rates.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Chuck, you are so correct.

http://www.disabledveterans.org/2016/03/09/task-force-rebukes-va-tbi-examinations/  recent

 

http://www.disabledveterans.org/2014/05/16/va-screwing-tbi-vets-quick-facts-tbi-evaluation/        2014

Ben Krause has more articles at his site on the TBI conundrum.

I wonder if the C & P docs are actually using the new TBI rules.

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use