Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Please Help With Appeal

Rate this question


OnRiver

Question

I have had diabetes since 1984 and am being awarded as such. I was termed down for peripherial neuropathy because the emg they did showed no damage to nerves. All my examenations through the VA have said I had numbness and pain in hands , feet and legs and that examintions showed that. VA Regional denied the claim because of the machine over the examinations....neurology, pediatry, etc. all said I had it but because I have focal neuorapthies I was suspect for stroke also.

I contacted neurology and they said the emg does not rule out perepherial nueropathies....this was put into the record....I then went to a neurologist in the VA and he says the following.

A/P Perephial neuropathy and history of cranial nueropathies(these are being compensated for and are listed as caused by diabetes).The periperhial neuropathies may be secondary to long-standing diabetes or small fiber painful type. I recommend that he continue neurotin as it is helping to relieve his painful symptoms. He should continue with physical activity and exercise as tolerated.

My question is will this be conclusive in my appeal....May be...sounds like a hedge anyone have any negative or positive experiences with this term.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Seems to me the BVA often remands VA statements like this because the VA doc at a C & P is supposed to use the as least as likely or more than likely etc- wording-

'May be'--- gives them a definite way out-

Focal neuropathies- do you mean the diabetes has caused visual problems?

what do they mean by this:

"A/P Perephial neuropathy and history of cranial nueropathies(these are being compensated for and are listed as caused by diabetes"

Is it that they SCed some of the neuropathy but not all?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't from a CP exam but is a follow up after they admitted that the EMG test that the CP examiner used did not rule out neuropathies. So they are saying the only 2 things that could cause it are those two mentioned. One of which is the secondary to diabetes. After 20 years they exspect diabetics to develope neuoropathies. I was diagnosed in 1984 with bells palsy etc. 4 other cases later they tell me it is a focal neuoropathy...

Yes visual problems as well as hearing problems can occur as a reult of focal nueropathies...7 and 8th cranial nerve...excessive tearing almost always causes probblems as does the resulting dry eye after the tearing stops. Pressur behind the eyes etc. Below are the listnigs used in CP exams but this is a Dr.s term I haven't been able to find used by any others. I feel it can be taklen either way...but because he lists 2 types it has to be 50/50 with the diabetes...longstanding diabetes...anyway thanks much for your comments and any other help will be appreciated. I am writting the appeal and might request a anothe C=P exam because the examiner used the emg to rule something out that he cshouldn't have. Any thoughts on that?

was due to: 100%

Most likely 75%

as least as likely as not 50 percent

less likely Less than 50 %

not due to: bohica

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

OnRiver,

My thought would be an IMO, but that depends on how long you want to fight the VA. Using the VA doctors to support your claim is not recomended.....It works for a small % of Vets, but for most you are wasting your time.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like a Job for Dr Craig Bash.

He can rip the VA diagnosis to shreds as long as he has the EMG and other Documents in his hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

onriver,

Do not rule out the possibility that the doctor who wrote the intrepretation of the emg is a liar. I would get all the reports and try to figure out what they mean. If you have any questions take them to another doctor. Consider having another emg by another doctor. There is more than one type of emg. Get the emg that is most accurate.

These emg results are required for disability and the doctors know it. They can be just as bad as renegade raters who think it is their duty to save the system money by writing reports that cannot be used for disability. I had a primary care doctor at the VA tell me it was not his job to assist his patients in getting Social Security disability. I went anf talked to an attorney who told me the guy was a liar. Doctors are required by law to make a diagnostic assessment when asked. The attorney provided me with some forms to take to the doctor that he was required to fill out. The attorney told me he would have the guy put in jail if he did not fill them out. The forms were filled out. I have had several other experiences that are even worse with idiot/lying doctors when I asked for reports for a disability assesment.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks

The emg was done to see if I had damage from a stroke as all the nueropathies of the face looked like it....they only did the emg on the left side so they weren't looking for perephial neuoropathies....you mentioned nexus? also WHEN A cp EXAMINER MAKES A mistake like saying the emg rules out perephial neuropathies which it doesn't and also states that>>>"Certainly examinations show perephial neuropathies but emg doesn't support the findings" then the certinly is considered certain....at least in examination....my sensory testing shows both loss of tempertaure and feeling...

Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use