Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim Update - Increase Granted, IU Deferred (I think)

Rate this question


anxiousinMD

Question

My claim was in prep for decision to pending decision approval and back to pfd last Friday on ebenefits. Monday it moved back to gathering of evidence and completion date moved to next year. After a meltdown, I pretty much mentally let go and checked out of the process at that point. But yesterday I went back on because I needed to add my kids that just started college as dependents and noticed "decision notification sent" next to the "development letter sent" that's been there forever, even though my claim status still said gathering of evidence. Thanks to ya'll here about ways to check, I looked at my disabilities and my AB8 and my PTSD-MST was increased from 30% to 70% (total 50% to 80% combined rating). I'm guessing the TDIU is deferred and that's the status that's reflecting in ebenefits, but deferred is better than denied. I haven't gotten any retro or BBE or monthly pay change yet. I feel relieved that SOMETHING happened, and I no longer feel so angsty about the process. I was afraid of outright rejection and having to wait forever for a denial, and basically the VA not acknowledging these conditions that have been killing me slowly.

Anyway, I learned a few things in terms of the questions that I asked before (thank you all for your answers, advice, and support):

- Checking ebenefits all day, everyday is unhealthy (and usually meaningless)

- The "needed from you/others" section in my ebenefits has been particularly worthless except to cause additional anxiety (in my case) as things have randomly appeared and disappeared

- In my case, I was concerned about other diagnosed and treated mental conditions in my med records not being inferred as symptomatic or comorbid with existing SC PTSD, but looks like they accepted those treatment notes as evidence

- Since the status of my claim went back to GOE with completion date changing from 9/16 out to 2/17, I went ahead and submitted additional evidence, like Dr's notes to my employer and FMLA forms for medical leave to support IU. I know it's supposed to kick you out of FDC if you add additional evidence...mine moved my status back to Under Review but only pushed the estimated completion date out a month. I'd rather that month to weigh stronger evidence than spend extra months for DRO or years waiting for BVA. And my 70% increase didn't suddenly disappear. Even if it does, I can't imagine they downgrade it with the additional evidence.

- I plan to NOD the effective date for the increase (they used the day I was hospitalized which was after I was placed on medical leave with severe/chronic diagnosis, which is still within the year limit), and I do have those dated documents from both doc and employer.

In a nutshell, I learned to worry less about ebenefits and more about qualifying evidence, and thanks to this forum I learned about things like NODs, EEDs, and secondaries. It's not over, but just wanted to share in case it helps anyone. THANK YOU ALL for bearing with me and for your service to our country and fellow vets on this site.

 

Edited by anxiousinMD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Have you filed the actual IU claim Yet?

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@Gastone yes, I filed the increase and IU at the same time in May.

@john999 I won't know for sure until I get the decision notification, but there are requests for SSA noted. I have been on long term disability leave from my employer since July 2015, I was asked by employer due to excessive absences and my disabilities affecting work. So no I am not currently working and I do have doc statements stating that I am unable to perform my job functions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Does any of the IU Evidence verify that you are unable to do even "Sedentary Work," that could provide the VA SGI cutoff Earned Income amount of $12,400 per yr ($238 per week)?

Any chance you could post redacted copies of your IU Evidence? The "Sedentary Work" issue, may seem insignificant, however it  is, a very big deal. Many a Vet, has been denied IU, due solely to a failure to address their "Sedentary Work" capabilities or lack thereof.

Rater's actually seem to care more about your possible Sedentary work income potential, at or above the SGI, than the fact you can't return to your old job and it's income.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@Gastone I'm not sure how to post it but my VA PCP completed a Form WH-380-E, which is US Dept of Labor Wage and Hour Division Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition (Family and Medical Leave Act). She checked yes for the box that asks if the employee is unable to perform any of his/her job duties, and she wrote "the patient is unable to sit for extended periods of time". For periods of incapacitation she wrote 1 times per 2 weeks, 3 days per episode, and "patient is sometimes unable to get out of bed because of back pain." I have the same form for my mental issues completed by my VA mental health provider, also stating I can't perform my job functions because of memory, concentration, etc. and frequent and long recurrences. All my work before was sedentary and my providers completed these forms for past periods of medical leave from my job. After they became excessive, my job "asked" told me to apply for LTD after our client requested I be removed from the contract because of unreliability and disruption to workflow. I really loved my job and it paid very well. These checks are a fraction of what I made even with the disability leave. I don't know what I will do if TDIU is denied. I'm already in the process of losing everything, foreclosure, credit, etc.

Edited by anxiousinMD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The IU Claim is in, so the wait is on, Deferred or Inferred, don't sweat it. I know, that's very hard to do. What else can you really do at this point?

Keep in mind, any Retro over, I think $25K is the number, requires a signature from the Rating Dept MFIC. If that's the case, your Rater will want to be absolutely sure, all I & T's are dotted and crossed on your Award Letter.

Be sure your Direct Deposit account is squared away, get real time Txt & Email regarding all Transactions. You'll get the Retro Deposit, usually well in advance of the actual VA Award Letter.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use